The Time-Bomb Fungus

English
Stages in the invasion of the fungus Colletotrichum gloeosporioides: 1)germination
 
The frustration is familiar: You buy a perfect, slightly hard avocado, mango or tomato, but by the time it ripens sufficiently to be eaten, it has developed soft rotten spots that force you to discard at least part of the fruit and wonder if you need to change your greengrocer. A new study conducted by Weizmann Institute scientists, in collaboration with Israel’s Agricultural Research Organization at the Volcani Center, reveals in great detail the stages of a fierce, protracted battle waged by the fruit to try to prevent the delayed rotting. The findings point to future preventive treatments.
 
 
 
 
 
The story begins long before the fruit makes its way to your greengrocer. The new study, recently reported in the New Phytologist, has shown that a widespread fungus, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, which infects close to 500 common plants and crops, starts its insidious invasion while the unripe fruit is still hanging on the tree. Once the fungus’s spore-like particles land on the fruit’s surface, they germinate. Within hours, each fungal particle grows a structure called an appressorium. This, in turn, releases a spear-like extension that pierces the fruit’s waxy surface and penetrates an unsuspecting cell, turning it into a “zombie” – that is, causing this cell to suspend most of its vital processes and devote itself to supporting the parasitic fungus. At this stage, the fungus switches into a dormant state that can last for months. To achieve such dormancy, the fungus structurally rearranges its chromosomes, shutting down hundreds of genes to reduce its own metabolism to the minimum required for maintenance.
2) penetration
 
Despite the furtiveness of the fungal attack, already at the initial, appressorial stage the plant senses the invasion by means of special cellular receptors and mounts a massive counterattack, activating thousands of genes, some of them encoding for antifungal compounds. These compounds are aimed at damaging the fungus and slowing its growth without affecting the plant’s own cells.
 
A fungus that survives the counterattack bides its time, encased within the fruit, and waits for ripening, a point at which the fruit’s defensive chemicals disappear. That is precisely when the fungus goes off like a time bomb.  Emerging from the dormant state, it starts releasing an array of digestive enzymes that rapidly kill the surrounding plant cells. Using these dead cells as a new source of nutrients, it begins to multiply rapidly, causing the death of even more fruit tissue and creating spots of soft rot on what was the greengrocers' prized fruit.
(l-r) Drs. Dana Ment and Gilgi Friedlander, Prov. Dov Prusky, Dr. Noam Alkan and Prof. Robert Fluhr
 
 
 
The research was performed in tomatoes, a convenient plant because its genome is known and because its fruit is available year-round, but the findings are applicable to other plant species infected by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. After sequencing the entire genome of the fungus, the scientists performed in-depth analyses, determining which genes were activated or shut down at different points of the infection and thus which enzymes and other substances were released, in the fungus and in the plant simultaneously, at each stage of the fungal infection.
 
 
 
 
 
The study was performed in the laboratory of Prof. Robert Fluhr of the Weizmann Institute’s Plant Sciences Department; and by Dr. Noam Alkan of the Weizmann Institute and of the Agricultural Research Organization, with Prof. Dov Prusky and Dr. Dana Ment of the Agricultural Research Organization; and Dr. Gilgi Friedlander of the Weizmann Institute’s Nancy and Stephen Grand Israel National Center for Personalized Medicine.

On the basis of these findings, it should be possible to devise methods for fighting the time-bomb fungus: by developing tools to screen infected fruit, breeding plants with a heightened resistance to the infection or designing chemicals that affect the growth of the fungus but not plant growth or human health. Until then, as you cut out that rotten spot, you can at least marvel at this scene of a grand battle waged between the two kingdoms, fungal and fruit.
 

 

 3) dormancy and 4) explosive growth
  
 

Prof.  Robert Fluhr's research is supported by the Angel Faivovich Foundation for Ecological Research; Lord David Alliance, CBE; and the estate of David Levinson. Prof. Fluhr is the incumbent of the Sir Siegmund Warburg Professorial Chair of Agricultural Molecular Biology.

 

 
3) dormancy and 4) explosive growth
Environment
English

Tuning a Genetic Orchestra

English
 
 

 (l-r) Lior Zelcbuch, Dr. Ron Milo and Niv Antonovsky

    

 

 

Though the process is highly complex, research on metabolism carries rich rewards: The active molecules produced through plant metabolism, for example, often have considerable benefits when we consume them. Thus for instance, the metabolite lycopene, which gives tomatoes their red color, is thought to help prevent cancer. In certain algae, the metabolic pathway proceeds in succeeding steps from lycopene to beta carotene, the carrot-orange metabolite that is also thought to confer health benefits, and eventually leads to astaxanthin. Astaxanthin is an antioxidant that is today marketed as a health supplement, and it may have a number of potential uses in medicine.

 

Bacterial colonies that express different metabolites

 

Dr. Ron Milo and research students Niv Antonovsky and Lior Zelcbuch of the Plant Sciences Department turned their sights on astaxanthin because the algae that produce it are hard to cultivate, and they require special conditions to make the metabolite. For Milo and his group, this was a side project. They are working with the bacterium E. coli to see if they can coax it to absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, as plants do. The scientists use E. coli – the workhorse of the genetic engineering field – because its genome is well known and easy to manipulate. Convincing the bacteria to produce astaxanthin would be a sort of test case for some cutting-edge methods of genetic engineering the scientists are using in experiments.


To get a bacterium to produce an algal metabolite requires more than inserting a gene or two into its genome. The entire network of genes that play in the metabolic “orchestra” must be reprogrammed. This process is referred to as “metabolic engineering.” It is something like planning an industrial process: A multi-stage work plan must be drawn up to encompass the entire assembly line as well as coordinating between the individual stations. Thus, for instance, if one station turns out an intermediate product in amounts that are too great for the next station on the line to handle, there will be a backup in the system. If, on the other hand, a station works too slowly, the rest of the plant will not be able to function at peak efficiency.
dunaliella
 
In other words, a good deal of fine-tuning is needed. To achieve the best levels of efficiency, the researchers applied genetic engineering techniques to a number of genes at once in the E. coli. From this they obtained thousands of different strains, from which they could select those with the desired properties. To adjust the output of the steps in the metabolic pathway they used a sort of “volume control button” on each gene. This is a segment at the beginning of the gene that gives instructions to the ribosome – the cellular factory that translates the genetic information to proteins. Small changes in the sequences of these segments can lead to significant differences in the intensity of gene expression.
 
To begin with, the research team generated random mutations in the “volume control buttons” of the genes involved in astaxanthin production and then inserted these genes into E. coli. The bacteria in their lab dishes began to produce engineered enzymes, and these, in turn, produced the different intermediate metabolites on the astaxanthin metabolic pathway.
pink
 
How did the team identify the strains that produced astaxanthin the most efficiently? Here nature came to the scientists’ aid: Astaxanthin is pink, and thus the bacterial colonies that were the loveliest pink color were those that had the most finely tuned metabolic pathways for its production. The most promising strains then underwent biochemical analysis to quantify astaxanthin levels. The best of these was found to yield over five times as much astaxanthin as other research groups around the world had managed to produce through metabolic engineering in bacteria. These results recently appeared in Nucleic Acids Research.

Milo and his group believe that this method could be used, in the future, in metabolic engineering to improve efficiency in the production of bioactive substances and drugs.
 
Dr. Ron Milo's research is supported by the Mary and Tom Beck-Canadian Center for Alternative Energy Research; the Lerner Family Plant Science Research Endowment Fund; the European Research Council; the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust; Dana and Yossie Hollander, Israel; the Jacob and Charlotte Lehrman Foundation; the Larson Charitable Foundation; the Wolfson Family Charitable Trust; Charles Rothschild, Brazil; Selmo Nissenbaum, Brazil; the Anthony Stalbow Charitable Trust; and the estate of David Arthur Barton.  Dr. Milo is the incumbent of the Anna and Maurice Boukstein Career Development Chair in Perpetuity.
 
 
Bacterial colonies that express different metabolites
Environment
English

Getting to the Root of the Problem

English
 
 
colorful roots
 
Common wisdom has it that carrots are rich in vitamin A and tomatoes contain large amounts of lycopene, but reality is much more complicated: Plants contain thousands of substances called secondary metabolites. Their name notwithstanding, these substances are not secondary at all; they are involved in a host of vital processes, including gene control and interaction with the environment. Their functions include attracting pollinating insects and defending the plant against pests or too much sunlight. Luckily for humans, many of these substances also contribute to our health.

In the past few years, much effort has gone into identifying, mapping and monitoring secondary plant metabolites. Scientists use an approach called metabolomics: obtaining a general profile of various metabolites in a biological sample. This approach might help develop plants with a high concentration of metabolites that are useful for humans, or plants that are capable of fighting off pests more efficiently. Metabolic profiles make it possible to identify the genes and biochemical pathways involved in the production of these metabolites, and to increase or decrease the activity of these genes on demand. But despite the rapid progress in metabolomics technologies, scientists have until now had to make do with metabolic profiles of plants at a low resolution: They could determine the total quantity of metabolites in a particular plant tissue or organ, but not exactly in which types of cell these metabolites were found.

Weizmann Institute scientists, using an advanced metabolomics system, have now managed to increase this resolution substantially, determining the metabolic profiles of various cell types in plant roots. The study, reported in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, was performed by Prof. Asaph Aharoni of the Institute’s Plant Sciences Department and his team: Drs. Arieh Moussaieff, Ilana Rogachev and Sergey Malitsky, and Merav Yativ, in collaboration with colleagues in Israel and abroad.

The scientists grew five types of plants, marking with a fluorescent dye particular cell types in their roots. They then sorted the root cells with the help of the fluorescent marker.

The study produced a comprehensive profile that revealed hundreds of substances, including those derived from three main chemical classes, distributed among different types of root cells. One of these groups, composed of a specific set of di-peptides, has been identified in roots for the first time. An analysis of the findings has also overturned an intuitive assumption: Metabolites were not necessarily found in the same cells that expressed the genes involved in their production. Apparently plants have a mechanism for moving substances to target areas.

Aharoni intends to increase the resolution of metabolic profiles even further, focusing on a particular group of root metabolites: plant hormones. A detailed mapping of materials in this group in root cells will make it possible, among other goals, to gain a better understanding of root development and growth, and to reveal how the root helps regulate the plant’s environment by releasing hormones into the surrounding soil.
 
Prof. Asaph Aharoni's research is supported by the Clore Center for Biological Physics; the Kahn Family Research Center for Systems Biology of the Human Cell; the Tom and Sondra Rykoff Family Foundation; Roberto and Renata Ruhman, Brazil; the Adelis Foundation; the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust; the Minna James Heineman Stiftun; and the Raymond Burton Plant Genome Research Fund. Prof. Aharoni is the incumbent of the Peter J. Cohn Professorial Chair.


 
 
colorful roots
Environment
English

The Pathway to Potato Poisons

English

 

potato sprout. Image: Thinkstock
 
 
In 1924, Science magazine reported on a fatal case of potato poisoning: James B. Matheney of Vandalia, Illinois, had gathered about one and a half bushels of tubers, which had turned green due to sunlight exposure. Two days after eating the potatoes, most of his family – wife, two daughters and four sons – showed symptoms of poisoning; the only exceptions were James himself, who didn’t eat the potatoes, and a breast-fed baby boy. His wife, aged 45, died a week later, followed by their 16-year-old daughter. The other five members of the family recovered.

Although such fatalities are rare among human beings, farm animals often get sick or die after eating green potatoes. Symptoms include damage to the digestive system as well as loss of sensation, hallucinations and other neurological disturbances. Death can be caused by a disruption of the heart beat. The culprits are the toxic substances solanine and chaconine; their concentration rises sharply with exposure to light or during sprouting, and they protect the tubers from insects and disease.

Solanine and chaconine belong to the large family of glycoalkaloids, which includes thousands of toxins found in small amounts in other edible plants, including tomatoes and eggplant. These substances have been known for over 200 years, but only recently has Prof. Asaph Aharoni of the Plant Sciences Department begun to unravel how they are produced in plants. He and his team have mapped out the biochemical pathway responsible for manufacturing glycoalkaloids from cholesterol. Their findings will facilitate the breeding of toxin-free crops and the development of new crop varieties from wild strains that contain such large amounts of glycoalkaloids, they are currently considered inedible. On the other hand, causing plants to produce glycoalkaloids if they don’t do so naturally or increasing their glycoalkaloid content can help protect them against disease.

Two years ago, in research reported in The Plant Cell, the scientists identified the first gene in the chain of reactions that leads to the production of glycoalkaloids. In a new study published recently in Science, they have now managed to identify nine other genes in the chain by using the original gene as a marker and comparing gene expression patterns in different parts of tomatoes and potatoes. Disrupting the activity of one of these genes, they found, prevented the accumulation of glycoalkaloids in potato tubers and tomatoes. The team then revealed the function of each of the genes and outlined the entire pathway, consisting of ten stages, in which cholesterol molecules turn into glycoalkaloids.

An analysis of the findings produced an intriguing insight: Most of the genes involved are grouped on chromosome 7 of the potato and tomato genome. Such grouping apparently prevents the plants from passing on to their offspring an incomplete glycoalkaloid pathway, which can result in the manufacture of chemicals harmful to the plants.

The research was conducted by postdoctoral fellow Dr. Maxim Itkin, who worked with Dr. Uwe Heinig, Dr. Oren Tzfadia, Pablo D. Cardenas, Dr. Samuel Bocobza, Dr. Sergey Malitsky and Dr. Ilana Rogachev of Prof. Aharoni’s lab; as well as Dr. Tamar Unger of the Israel Structural Proteomics Center at the Weizmann Institute, and scientists from the National Chemical Laboratory in Pune, India, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the Wageningen University, the Netherlands.
 
Prof. Asaph Aharoni's research is supported by the Clore Center for Biological Physics; the Kahn Family Research Center for Systems Biology of the Human Cell; the Tom and Sondra Rykoff Family Foundation; Roberto and Renata Ruhman, Brazil; the Adelis Foundation; the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust; the Minna James Heineman Stiftung; and the Raymond Burton Plant Genome Research Fund. Prof. Aharoni is the incumbent of the Peter J. Cohn Professorial Chair.


 
 
potato sprout. Image: Thinkstock
Environment
English

Limits to Growth

English
 
 

Prof. Yuval Eshed

Elephants’ ears and those of humans may differ wildly in size, but nature provides each with a more-or-less fixed range and upper limit. Such evolutionary extremes are seen in the plant kingdom as well: Cabbage leaves, for instance, are ten times the size of those of a close relative, the inconspicuous mustard cress (Arabidopsis thaliana). What sets the ultimate size of an organ such as a leaf? Research in the lab of Prof. Yuval Eshed of the Plant Sciences Department has revealed a part of the answer, and the findings are something of a surprise: Most of the mechanisms involved in fixing leaf size are ones that put the brakes on growth, rather than ones for promoting growth.

These findings originated in previous research in Eshed’s lab. In the earlier study, the team was investigating a different question: What causes a leaf to begin growing? The onset of growth is not a preordained, automatic event. First the plant produces a leaf primordium, which, in order to grow, must undergo division into top and bottom sides. It is the interactions between the two sides of the primordium that initiate leaf growth. This type of interaction, interestingly enough, is also found in an unrelated two-dimensional organ – a developing fly wing. In the research, which was conducted by then research students Drs. Idan Efroni and Eyal Blum, and which appeared in The Plant Cell, the researchers wanted to understand the exact nature of this interaction. They used genetic engineering to create plants with leaves made up of a single cell type – either top or bottom – and compared them with normal plants.
 
The genetically engineered leaves did not grow; but the comparison enabled the scientists to discover dozens of proteins that were expressed in the normal plants but not in those with one-sided leaves. In further experiments, they looked for the functions of these proteins by creating a new series of genetically engineered plants, each producing a large quantity of one of the proteins. To their surprise, none of these proteins spurred leaf growth: Around half had no effect on leaf size, while the other half decreased it.
 
leaf size
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
This finding seemed to throw a large bucket of cold water on their basic assumption that the majority of factors in a developing leaf would be pro-growth. To understand where they had gone wrong, the team focused on a group of proteins that were implicated in reducing leaf size, a family called TCP that regulates gene expression. Using a combination of genetic methods, the researchers created plants that did not produce any of the eight members of the TCP family. The result: a major improvement in leaf growth.
 
This finding led the scientists to the conclusion that the logic behind leaf growth is quite different from what they had originally thought. Growing appears to be the “default” setting for the leaf, so it does not require much prompting or regulation for it to happen; putting the brakes on growth, on the other hand, entails a number of different factors. This is necessary, in part, because it can take weeks or months for a leaf to grow and, during that time, any number of environmental factors can change. Lack of water or a rise in temperature, for example, can activate the brakes on growth. (That is why, in arid, subtropical regions like those of Israel, many wild plants sprout big leaves in the winter and small leaves in the summer.)
 
Leaf from a genetically engineered plant that does not produce five members of the TCP family and another four similar factors. These leaves grow without stopping
 
In a follow-up study that appeared in Developmental Cell, Efroni and Eshed discovered how the orders to halt leaf growth are carried out. The scientists suspected that a plant hormone called cytokinin was involved. Cytokinin had previously been known to encourage cell division but hinder differentiation. The researchers sprayed the hormone on the leaves of plants that had been genetically engineered to produce a larger-than-normal amount of TCPs, and found that these leaves did not respond to the hormone and thus did not grow larger.

In other words, the TCPs reduced the sensitivity of the leaves to the growth-promoting hormone. How do they do this? In an experiment conducted together with a research group from Pennsylvania, Eshed and his team revealed the active mechanisms in detail. To carry out their duties, TCPs recruit the help of another protein – one that exposes certain areas of the genetic sequence so that the process of gene expression can begin. One gene that gets exposed in this way reduces the sensitivity of the plant to cytokinin; the TCP-protein partnership increases the expression of the gene. This system turns out to be quite flexible, enabling a range of leaf sizes within the proscribed limits. It can be activated at various stages in leaf development, so that the later the braking mechanism is deployed, the larger the leaf.

More than revealing a mechanism for regulating plant size, says Eshed, these studies have granted researchers a peek into the basic principles that guide development. They have shown that those principles can sometimes go against the instincts of even the most experienced scientific researchers.
 
Prof. Yuval Eshed is the incumbent of the Jacques Mimran Professorial Chair.
 
 
 
what determines how big a plant will grow
Environment
English

How to Start a Revolution

English

 

We all know how hard it is to shift an economy from stagnation to growth, but in nature, a transition of this kind occurs on a routine basis – whenever plant seeds shift from a dormant state to that of germination.

Prof. Gad Galili
 
This transition calls for sudden, far-ranging changes in all the plant’s systems: The plant’s entire genome undergoes reprogramming that affects the expression of genes and the manufacture of proteins. Hundreds of proteins – those that help the seed develop and block premature germination – stop being produced, whereas the production of hundreds of other proteins – those needed for germination – is set in motion.

“The germination revolution” plays a crucial role both in nature and in agriculture because it has an enormous impact on the harvest. Generally, the greater the proportion of germinating seeds and the faster their germination, the bigger the harvest. In fact, farmers use various methods to stimulate germination artificially – for example, by soaking dry seeds for a short while in a germination-promoting solution. Understanding germination on the molecular and metabolic levels is, therefore, vitally important: It can lead to sophisticated ways of improving the rate and speed of germination, thereby increasing crop harvest. Moreover, it can help control the precise timing: When the seeds germinate too early, while still attached to the parent plant and before they reach the soil, they are unlikely to develop into new plants.
 
 
Prof. Gad Galili of the Weizmann Institute’s Plant Sciences Department has conducted pioneering studies on the “germination revolution.” He has recently discovered that a molecular process called selective autophagy, which is central to the plant’s life, also takes part in controlling the germination.
germination
In general, autophagy, which means “self-eating,” involves the dismantling of proteins, and it occurs in numerous organisms; originally discovered in yeast, it exists also in animals, including human beings. Autophagy has been the subject of extensive studies – among other reasons because in humans, defects in selective autophagy are implicated in Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and other common diseases. In the plant world, the main function of autophagy is to save the plant in times of trouble. Since plants, unlike animals, cannot run away from danger, their survival depends on flexible mechanisms that help them cope with mortal threats by other means. Large-scale autophagy, for instance, can prevent plant death when nutrients are in short supply.

Lately, however, it has become clear that selective autophagy, in which individual proteins or other cellular components are dismantled without connection to distress or danger, takes place in plants at certain times, including the preparation for germination. Galili has discovered about ten genes that might be involved in selective autophagy in plants. In studies published this year in The Plant Cell and other journals, he has focused on two of these genes, ATI1 and ATI2, which are unique to plants – that is, they do not exist in animals.
 
When the scientists suppressed the production of the ATI1 protein, which is involved in selective autophagy, and placed the seeds under conditions that reduce germination efficiency, the genetically engineered seeds (right panel) germinated much slower than the control seeds (left panel)
 

 

 
In experiments with the model plant Arabidopsis, Galili and his team have shown that enhancing the expression of ATI1 stimulates germination. When this gene’s activity increased, so did the proportion of germinating seeds; moreover, these seeds germinated faster. The scientists hypothesize that ATI1 and ATI2 promote germination by dismantling proteins that block this process. When the scientists blocked the activity of the two genes, ATI1 and ATI2, germination was reduced. In addition to clarifying the roles of these genes, the scientists also obtained further details about their functioning – for example, where exactly in the plant cell their activity takes place. Prof. Galili’s team included postdoctoral fellow Dr. Arik Honig and graduate student Tamar Avin-Wittenberg.

The study of selective autophagy in plants is still in its infancy, but unraveling it in greater detail should enable plant researchers to improve plant growth and crop yields by enhancing seed germination on demand.
 
Prof. Gad Galili’s research is supported by the Lerner Family Plant Science Research Endowment Fund; and the Adelis Foundation. Prof. Galili is the incumbent of the Bronfman Professorial Chair of Plant Science.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 
germination
Environment
English

Darkness at Noon

English

Work of art: A portion of a plant cell

 
The woman in the image has a gorgeous mane of hair that partly wraps her naked torso. This is not a newly discovered Modigliani. The “woman” is in fact a portion of a plant cell magnified more than twenty thousand times. (Above, top) In a project that won first prize in the Beauty of Science competition held recently in the Weizmann Institute’s Feinberg Graduate School, Onie Tsabari, a student in the lab of Prof. Ziv Reich of the Biological Chemistry Department, turned this image into a work of art. (Above, bottom)

Now in a new study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, Reich and his colleagues from Washington State University have revealed why the “hair” in that image is so lush. It is in fact a network of tiny flattened vesicles called thylakoids which reside in the plant’s chloroplast and contain the machinery that carries out the primary steps of photosynthesis – the process by which plants, algae and certain bacteria use sunlight to produce chemical energy and, along the way, almost all of Earth’s oxygen. The new study – selected for the “Faculty of 1000” website of important articles on biology and medicine – has shown that the water-filled space within the thylakoids, called the lumen, nearly doubles in width when the leaves are exposed to light.

The expansion of the lumen facilitates photosynthesis by increasing the space available for the diffusion of a protein that transports electrons. These electrons are eventually used to convert carbon dioxide into sugars, and their flow is essential for the formation of ATP – the major energy molecule of living cells. The enlarging of the lumen also promotes the repair of damaged components of the photosynthetic apparatus – by facilitating their dismantling and shuttling of the components.

When light is replaced by darkness, the lumen shrinks, thus restricting the movement of proteins. This shrinkage is probably intended to prevent damage to the photosynthetic machinery at dawn or during rapid increases in light intensity (due to sudden changes in cloud cover, for instance). The gradually expanding lumen ensures that the rate of electron transport doesn’t rise too suddenly – such a rise could damage a key protein in the electron transport chain.
 
 
Prof. Ziv Reich
 
These findings overturn a long-standing belief that the thylakoid lumen contracts under light, which stemmed from the limitations of the research methods available in the early 1970s. The new study was performed with advanced techniques: A plant leaf was examined by cryo-electron microscopy after being rapidly vitrified at very high pressure in liquid nitrogen and cut up into ultra-thin slices, each only a few tens of nanometers (billionths of a meter) thick. The team, headed by the Institute’s Prof. Reich and Washington State University’s Prof. Helmut Kirchnoff included Washington State’s Chris Hall, Magnus Wood and Dr. Miroslava Hirbstova, and Weizmann’s Onie Tsabari, Dr. Reinat Nevo and Dr. Dana Charuvi of the Biological Chemistry Department, as well as Dr. Eyal Shimoni of the Electron Microscopy Unit.

In addition to revealing the beauty inside a common plant cell, the new findings provide crucial insights into the regulation of photosynthesis and into the ways by which plants adapt to changes in light conditions that occur throughout the day.
 
Prof. Ziv Reich’s research is supported by the Carolito Stiftung.
 
 
Work of art: A portion of a plant cell
Environment
English

The Vitamin Map

English

Improve speed on the Piccadilly Line, create delays on the track to Hyde Park Corner, route more trains through Kings Cross. These are not suggestions for baffling passengers of the London Underground. Rather, it’s a metaphor describing how plant scientists may one day breed new varieties: To enhance the breeding process, they may consult plant metabolism models that resemble the familiar map of the London Tube.
 

Tube map for plants
 
Creating such metabolic models, which simulate the network of biochemical reactions in the plant, is extremely challenging because plant metabolism involves thousands of enzymes and is extremely complex. A new plant metabolic model, the most complete to date, has recently been created by a team headed by scientists from the Weizmann Institute, the Technion – Israel Institute of Technology and Tel Aviv University. This computerized model, described in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, focuses on Arabidopsis, a plant in the mustard family that is commonly used in research. The network of this plant’s metabolic reactions is so wide and branched that it indeed evokes the layout of an extensive underground system, in which the lines represent the pathways of metabolic reactions, the trains symbolize individual enzymes and the ends of the lines – the reactions’ end products.
 
 
Applied to the breeding of plants, the model might predict, for example, that the best way to increase the production of a desired nutrient, say vitamin E, is to close a particular “train line” – that is, block a certain biochemical reaction in the plant, or to increase “traffic” on another line – that is, speed up another reaction. Armed with such predictions – the technical term is “predictive metabolic engineering” – plant breeders should be able to produce desired new varieties more quickly and efficiently than by trial and error, as has been done in the past.
 
Prof. Asaph Aharoni
The new model has been created by Prof. Asaph Aharoni and Ph.D. student Shira Mintz-Oron of the Weizmann Institute’s Plant Sciences Department, Dr. Tomer Shlomi of the Technion and Prof. Eytan Ruppin of Tel Aviv University. The team also included the Institute’s Ph.D. student Sergey Malitsky and Aharoni’s lab assistant Dr. Sagit Meir.

Though the model was developed for Arabidopsis, it is applicable to many other plants as well. Among the projects to which Aharoni and his colleagues now intend to apply it is the breeding of new crops, such as rice that is rich in vitamin B1. Crops fortified in this way might in the future help prevent serious vitamin deficiencies that affect people in developing countries.

Prof. Asaph Aharoni’s research is supported by the Tom and Sondra Rykoff Family Foundation; Roberto and Renata Ruhman, Brazil; the Clore Center for Biological Physics; the Minna James Heineman Stiftung; and the Kahn Family Research Center for Systems Biology of the Human Cell. Prof. Aharoni is the incumbent of the Peter J. Cohn Professorial Chair.
 
Tube map for plants
Environment
English

Keeping Pace with the World’s Food Demand

English
 
 
(l-r) Drs. Olga Davydov and Nardy Lampl, Prof. Robert Fluhr, Drs. Ofra Budai-Hadrian and Thomas Roberts. Secrets to growth

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
When a heat wave sent tomato prices soaring this past summer, before the High Holidays, Israelis got a taste of the precarious nature of our food supply: Any climate upheaval can instantly create dire shortages of food staples. Even in the absence of natural disasters, securing the world’s food supply in the 21st century promises to be a tall order: Global population continues to grow while the areas of cultivated land tend to remain stable – a situation that is bound to lead to food shortages, and will be further aggravated by global warming.
 
“It’s vitally important to keep up the green revolution,” says Prof. Robert Fluhr, referring to the increases in yields that in the second half of the 20th century saved much of the world from starvation. “Adapting agriculture to meeting the world’s needs is a continuous battle. We must stay on our toes in order to win.”
 
Feeding the world is all the more challenging because a staggering proportion of crop yields worldwide – above 30 percent – is regularly lost to pests, disease and weather. Prof. Fluhr’s laboratory in the Weizmann Institute’s Plant Sciences Department focuses on research that can help increase yields by reducing these losses. In particular, the lab’s research is aimed at understanding – and ultimately enhancing – the plant’s natural defenses against a variety of ills.
 
In a recent collaborative study with researchers from Australia, Fluhr’s team has taken an important step in this direction. The scientists have unraveled the control switch for a crucial plant growth- and survival- mechanism: the killing of individual plant cells by activating enzymes called proteases that chop up essential proteins. These enzymes come into play when the plant is trying to control the spread of a disease or needs to recover nutrients from old unused leaves. It’s crucially important, however, that the proteases work at precisely the pace needed to ensure the plant’s survival: fast enough to contain a disease, for example, but not so fast as to cause this rescue operation to kill the entire plant.
 
 
Precarious supply? Photo: Böhringer Friedrich, Wikimedia Commons

 

The new study led by Prof. Fluhr has defined a potential “pace-setter” that can determine the rate at which proteases perform their “constructive destruction”: a molecule belonging to the family of proteins called serpins. The molecule, referred to as AtSerpin1, functions like a molecular mousetrap, latching onto a specific protease and inactivating it when the destruction must be slowed down. In this manner, AtSerpin1 determines the pace at which cell death will occur in the plant. The study, published in the Journal of Biological Chemistry, was performed by former graduate student Dr. Nardy Lampl, and Drs. Ofra Budai-Hadrian and Olga Davydov of the Weizmann Institute’s Plant Sciences Department, in collaboration with Australian researchers: Tom V. Joss and Dr. Thomas H. Roberts of Macquarie University and Dr. Stephen J. Harrop and Prof. Paul M. G. Curmi of the University of New South Wales, in Sydney.

The serpin “pace-setter” must be an unusually effective mechanism, for it has been in use for at least a billion years – a sure sign of evolutionary success. In fact, it exists both in plants and in animals and can be traced back to their common ancestors, single-celled eukaryotes (that is, cells possessing a nucleus) that in Earth’s distant past gave rise to plant and animal kingdoms alike. In mammals, including humans, serpin-controlled proteases perform a variety of functions in immunity, blood clotting and development.

The fact that in animals many protease activities are regulated by serpins has been known for a number of years, but the Weizmann Institute-led study represents the first time the serpin “pace-setter” and the specific protease with which it interacts have been identified in plants. The study was performed on Arabidopsis, a convenient model plant related to mustard; but genome analysis suggests that the findings are applicable to the entire plant kingdom. These findings open up a new avenue of research that can identify additional “pace-setters,” that is, other serpin molecules regulating the activity of different proteases. The ultimate goal: an in-depth understanding of plant defenses that can help create hardier plants, minimizing loss in the face of adversity.

Fluhr says that achieving this goal has a special urgency: “As a country where overcrowding, water shortage and the scarcity of arable land make agriculture particularly vulnerable to environmental impact, Israel can set an example for increasing crop productivity worldwide.”
 
Prof. Robert Fluhr's research is supported by Joel Jacob, Bloomfield, MI. Prof. Fluhr is the incumbent of the Sir Siegmund Warburg Professorial Chair of Agricultural Molecular Biology.

 
 

 

 
(l-r) Drs. Olga Davydov and Nardy Lampl, Prof. Robert Fluhr, Drs. Ofra Budai-Hadrian and Thomas Roberts. Secrets to growth
Environment
English

Weizmann Institute researchers, together with an international team: Sequence the Full Woodland Strawberry Genome

English
In a collaborative effort involving 74 researchers from 38 research institutes, scientists have produced the full genome of a wild strawberry plant. The research appeared today in Nature Genetics. Drs. Asaph Aharoni and Avital Adato of the Weizmann Institute’s Plant Sciences Department were the sole Israeli scientists participating in the project, but they made a major contribution in mapping the genes and gene families responsible for the strawberry’s flavor and aroma.
 
The woodland strawberry (Fragaria vesca) is closely related to garden-variety cultivated strawberry. The fruit of this berry contains large amounts of anti-oxidants (mainly tannins, the substances that give wine their astringency), as well as vitamins A, C and B12 and minerals – potassium, calcium and magnesium. In addition, the strawberry fruit is uniquely rich in substances for flavor and aroma.
 
Participation in this project is something of a circle closer for Aharoni: For a number of years he has been investigating the metabolic pathways of ripening, in which the substance that give the fruit its flavor and aroma are produced. Aharoni was one of the first to use biological chips to analyze the genetic networks involved in creating these substances. He has also conducted a comparative analysis of these genes in wild and cultivated plants, looking for the differences. Now that the full genome of the wild strawberry plant is available for research, he is able not only to conduct deeper and broader investigations, but to shed new light on some of his past findings. Thus, for instance, in carrying out a computerized analysis of the woodland strawberry genome, Adato was able to place an enzyme that Aharoni had previously characterized in a relatively small enzyme family. This small family is responsible for the production of a large number of aromatic substances, and the finding helped clarify their means of production.
 
Aharoni hopes that, among other things, the newly sequenced genome will help scientists understand how to return the flavors and aromas that have been lost over years of breeding in the cultivated cousin of the wild strawberry. The intense, concentrated aroma and flavor of the woodland strawberry are, he says, something to aspire to.
 
The woodland strawberry has now joined the elite list of plants, including rice, grapes and soya, which have had their genomes sequenced. The length of the genome is about 240 million bases and contains around 35,000 genes. (In comparison, the human genome has three billion bases, but only 23,000 genes.) The woodland strawberry genome is relatively short, simple and easy to manipulate, and the plant grows quickly and easily. These qualities make it an ideal model plant that might provide insight into other related agricultural crops (the rose family) including cultivated strawberries, and such fruit trees as apples peaches, cherries and almonds.

 
Dr. Asaph Aharoni’s research is supported by the De Benedetti Foundation-Cherasco 1547; the Minna James Heineman Stiftung; the Willner Family Foundation; and Roberto and Renata Ruhman, Brazil. Dr. Aharoni is the incumbent of the Adolpho and Evelyn Blum Career Development Chair of Cancer Research.

 
The Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot, Israel, is one of the world's top-ranking multidisciplinary research institutions. Noted for its wide-ranging exploration of the natural and exact sciences, the Institute is home to 2,600 scientists, students, technicians and supporting staff. Institute research efforts include the search for new ways of fighting disease and hunger, examining leading questions in mathematics and computer science, probing the physics of matter and the universe, creating novel materials and developing new strategies for protecting the environment.
 
Weizmann Institute news releases are posted on the World Wide Web at http://wis-wander.weizmann.ac.il/, and are also available at http://www.eurekalert.org/
Environment
English

Pages