We plant forests today because they are “carbon sinks” − they can offset rising carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere. But not all forests are equal when it comes to cooling the planet, and it has not always been clear where new forests can do the most good in the shortest amount of time. The results of a new study in the group of Prof. Dan Yakir at the Weizmann Institute of Science, which were recently published in Scientific Reports, suggest that planting the right kinds of forests extensively over areas that have mostly been neglected in forestation efforts − semi-arid regions in Africa and Australia − could have a measurably positive influence on the climate as well as help offset a significant portion of human-induced global warming.
Yakir and his group in the Weizmann Institute’s Earth and Planetary Sciences Department had a unique trove of data on the complex relationship between a semi-arid forest, on the one hand, and the atmosphere and climate on the other: 16 years of recorded information from a station in the Yatir planted forest on the edge of the Negev desert. This station, managed by staff scientist Dr. Eyal Rotenberg and supported by the Jewish National Fund (JNF-KKL), tracks the flow of carbon, water, heat and other factors through the ecosystem and climate of a semi-arid forest site. Over the years, Yakir and his group have discovered how such forests maintain an “energy budget” that includes mechanisms for both heating and cooling. Forests, for example, can cool the ground beneath them, but the dark-colored leaves also trap the sun’s radiation and release it as heat. They require water, but they also evaporate cooling water into air. The studies in Yakir’s group have shown that a semi-arid forest like Yatir can absorb more carbon than had been previously thought, but it can also take a long time to pay back in cooling, in part because the dark canopy produces more heat than the reflective, light-colored, sandy soil.
Dr. Gil Yosef, then a research student in Yakir’s group, wondered if the different factors operating in a small semi-arid forest would play out in the same way on a larger scale. He took, as examples, two regions with similarly low rainfall: the Sahel, a large region bordering the Sahara, and a large semi-arid tract of Northern Australia. The question he asked was: “Would the climate be affected if ‘Yatir-like’ forests were planted extensively in these regions?” Yosef and Yakir turned to a group at the University of Miami, Florida, led by Prof. Roni Avissar and Dr. Robert Walko, who had devised a sophisticated climate model. This model enabled the group to run simulations and compare them with the real data for a 15-year period in the recent past. In their simulations, the group added to the model an imaginary forest of trees similar to the existing ones in Yatir: These were appropriate for the climate, with the right sort of leaves and root systems, the right full-grown height and density, and planted over most of these large regions.
Avissar and Walko's model, one of the latest generation of climate models, granted the scientists a sort of telescopic view that could investigate differences in geographic areas of a few kilometers, and then enabled them to zoom out to see the larger, continental-scale patterns − for example, of the types of atmospheric circulation that create clouds and drop rain in different areas. The 15-year span based on real weather added further nuances to the simulations − varying amounts of rainfall, for example.
A large-scale afforestation effort in these semi-arid regions could have a larger pay-off than planting trees in high-latitude regions like Scandinavia
Yosef's simulations showed that large-scale forest planting in the two regions would not just produce local cooling, its effects could even extend more broadly to the regional atmospheric circulation and would significantly increase rain over these areas. On the basis of the model, Yosef estimated that large-scale afforestation in these areas alone could create a carbon sink that would be equivalent to around 10% of the global biospheric carbon uptake, and help cool our overheated planet within around six years.
The main reason for this phenomenon, says Yakir, is that trees are excellent “water miners.” Trees that thrive in semi-arid regions tend to have deep roots. On a large scale, millions of trees reaching down into the Earth to pull up more water and evaporate it through their leaves should make the surface measurably cooler. Cooler surface temperatures trigger a chain of events that ultimately enhances both precipitation and carbon uptake − and this far outweighs any negative warming effect associated with the dark color of the leaves.
In addition, the researchers point out that properly managed forests could provide wood, food and a livelihood to the people living in these regions.
Forests are considered one of the best means we have today of offsetting global climate change because they tie up large amounts of carbon. In other words, they simply have a large biomass compared to other types of plant cover and, since they tend to be long-lived, they keep that carbon tied up for a long time. This is often referred to as carbon sequestration.
But forests interact with the climate in all sorts of ways – not just through their uptake of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Their color changes the amount of radiation absorbed by the Earth’s surface; and together with evapotranspiration – the movement of water up through the roots to the leaves and out through pores in the leaves – provides the trees with ways of adjusting their internal temperature. Yakir and his group found that some trees, if they act together on a sufficiently large scale, can also promote cloud formation. So trees not only adapt to a climate, they shape their climate – and ours – as well.
Prof. Dan Yakir's research is supported by the Sussman Family Center for the Study of Environmental Sciences; and the Cathy Wills and Robert Lewis Program in Environmental Science.
Please share if you found this interesting: