Opening the Window

English
Prof. Yari Reiser and his team. Transplant cells

 

 
Diabetics, particularly those afflicted with Type 1 (juvenile) diabetes, face a lifetime of daily injections to replace the insulin their bodies fail to produce, as well as a host of risks, including blindness, amputation, kidney failure and heart disease. New treatments for diabetes in recent years include the transplantation of human pancreatic tissue in which insulin is produced. Unfortunately, this sort of transplant remains an option for only a few, as there are not nearly enough donor organs available. 
 
Many animals produce insulin, and the insulin-producing cells of pigs, in particular, are very similar to those of humans. If this tissue could be transplanted into humans, millions of diabetics might benefit. The only catch is that our immune systems are quite vigilant in rejecting any foreign tissue, no matter how similar. Pancreatic tissue from animals that has been experimentally transplanted into non-human primates has, until now, evoked a fierce immune response. 
 
Embryonic tissue, however, might be more easily adapted to the human body. New research by Prof. Yair Reisner of the Weizmann Institute's Immunology Department has brought the possibility of transplants from pig embryos one step closer. In an article that appeared in PLoS Medicine, Reisner and his team demonstrated how proper timing may be the key.  
 
In previous work, Reisner and his team had shown that each embryonic organ has its own "time window" during which the chances for successful transplantation are optimal. Prior to this window, the early tissue's cells, which are still largely undifferentiated, can give rise to tumors. Past the window, however, they may be too well developed: They already carry too many markers that identify them as foreign, causing the body to reject them. By transplanting tissue from pig embryos into mice lacking proper immune systems, the researchers determined that the best time frame for pancreatic tissue was about a third of the way through gestation (from 42 to 56 days).
 
In the new study, Reisner's team wanted to see how such transplanted tissue might function in the body. They first implanted embryonic tissue from pig pancreases into special mice that had human immune cells circulating in their systems - creating a sort of surrogate human immune system. From this experiment they learned that when tissue taken at 42 days (within the time frame they had previously determined) was used, the immune response was markedly reduced.  
 
Next, the team tried the experiment on mice with fully functioning mouse immune systems, but they destroyed the insulin-producing cells in the mice's pancreases before proceeding with the transplant. With the aid of relatively mild immune suppression protocols, the implanted tissue was fully functional over time, producing insulin and maintaining the mice's blood sugar at normal levels.
 
According to Reisner, the next logical step would be preclinical trials on non-human primate models. Although the road to pig embryo-human transplants is still a long and uncertain one, if further studies bear out the team's findings, regular insulin injections could one day become a thing of the past for many diabetics.    

Prof. Yair Reisner's research is supported by the J & R Center for Scientific Research; the Belle S. and Irving E. Meller Center for the Biology of Aging; the Gabrielle Rich Center for Transplantation Biology Research; the Abisch Frenkel Foundation for the Promotion of Life Sciences; the Loreen Arbus Foundation; the Crown Endowment Fund for Immunological Research; the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research - Weizmann Institute of Science Exchange Program; the Charles and David Wolfson Charitable Trust; Renee Companez, Australia; Mr. and Mrs. Irwin Goldberg, Las Vegas, NV; and Mr. and Mrs. Barry Reznik, Brooklyn, NY. Prof. Reisner is the incumbent of the Henry H. Drake Professorial Chair in Immunology.
(l-r) Dr. Smadar Even Tov Friedman, Prof. Yair Reisner and Dalit Tchorsh. Timing
Life Sciences
English

Precise Pattern

English
 
A team of researchers led by Prof. Irun Cohen of the Immunology Department has revealed the molecular mechanism of a vaccine for Type 1 diabetes, an autoimmune disorder in which the immune system mistakenly attacks the body's own insulin-producing cells.

The vaccine, which arrests the progression of Type 1 diabetes in laboratory animals, was developed by Cohen and his colleagues several years ago. The scientists had discovered that a particular protein called HSP60, or even only a particular small fragment of it – the peptide p277 – is able to shut down the autommune response causing Type 1 diabetes. Yet although the vaccine is currently being tested in clinical trials in Europe and the United States, its precise mechanism had until recently remained unknown.

As described in a paper published in the Journal of Clinical Investigation, the scientists have now managed to identify the exact immune cells upon which p277 acts, as well as its mechanism of action. They have also shown that to activate this mechanism, p277 must be bound to the receptor TLR-2, which is found on the walls of regulatory immune cells.

“These findings are important: By identifying the molecular activity of p277 with such precision, we can copy nature's own system in regulating the immune response,” says Cohen.

Postdoctoral fellow Dr. Alexandra Zanin-Zhorov spearheaded the project; the other scientists participating in this study were the late Prof. Ofer Lider, Dr. Liora Cahalon, postdoctoral fellow Dr. Guy Tal and Raanan Margalit.  

Prof. Irun Cohen’s research is supported by the Minna James Heineman Stiftung; and the Robert Koch Minerva Center for Research in Autoimmune Disease.
Life Sciences
English

A Touch of Luck

English
Prof. Nava Dekel. Fortuitous accident
 
 

 

In the fields of observation, chance favors only the prepared mind.

- Louis Pasteur, 1854


Serendipity - making fortunate discoveries by accident - has played a role in some of the most influential scientific achievements. This is more or less what happened to Prof. Nava Dekel of the Weizmann Institute's Biological Regulation Department. "It all began with a straightforward study," says Dekel, "but it has turned into something completely unexpected, opening up new research directions that might give hope to women with fertility problems."
 
Dekel was originally interested in discovering whether a specific protein, known to form channels for communication between neighboring cells, plays a role in the implantation of the fertilized egg into a woman's uterus. This stage is a critical one - IVF treatments most often fail at or soon after implantation. In an ongoing collaboration with Kaplan Hospital, Dekel and her research team recruited 12 women, all of whom suffered from fertility problems and had failed to conceive after numerous IVF treatments, and took a series of uterine biopsies at different stages in the menstrual cycle. After analyzing the results, the team found, as they had predicted, that levels of the protein under study undergo changes during the menstrual cycle, and the production patterns did, indeed, point to a role for this protein in the successful implantation of the fertilized egg in the uterus.

So far, they'd found what they were looking for and everything was going according to plan. The surprise was just around the corner: Of the 12 women who participated in the study, 11 became pregnant during the next round of IVF. Was this merely a coincidence, or did the biopsies somehow effect a "magic touch"? Dekel set up another experiment, again involving women who had problems conceiving. This time, however, they divided the patients into a group of 45 volunteers who had biopsies taken and a control group of 89 women who did not undergo biopsy. There was no doubt about it: The biopsy procedure had somehow managed to double the pregnancy success rate.

How does a simple biopsy create such a dramatic increase in pregnancies? "It seems counter-intuitive. How can injury lead to a positive outcome?" Dekel wondered. She suggests, on the basis of this and other evidence obtained from previous studies, that some form of distress, in this case a biopsy procedure, provokes a response that renders the uterus more receptive to implantation. Dekel and her team are continuing to investigate, looking for the exact mechanisms involved when an unreceptive uterus turns into a receptive one as a result of local injury. Both animal studies and human clinical trials are now being conducted to identify genes that may play a role in this process.

From an accidental finding, these scientists have started down a new path of inquiry that may, in the future, give birth to new treatment procedures to improve the success rate of IVF or even tackle some types of fertility problems directly.

This study is conducted by Dekel and Drs. Yael Kalma and Yulia Gnainsky (former and present post-doctoral fellows, respectively), in collaboration with Drs. Amichai Barash and Irit Granot of the In Vitro Fertilization Unit of the Kaplan Medical Center Obstetrics and Gynecology Department.

Prof. Nava Dekel's research is supported by the Y. Leon Benoziyo Institute for Molecular Medicine; the Willner Family Center for Vascular Biology; the Dwek Family Biomedical Research Fund; the Paul Godfrey Research Foundation in Children's Diseases; the Rachel and Shaul Peles Fund for Hormone Research; Mr. Max Candiotty, Los Angeles, CA; and Shimon Shestovich Ltd. Prof. Dekel is the incumbent of the Philip M. Klutznick Professorial Chair of Developmental Biology.
 
Prof. Nava Dekel.
Life Sciences
English

Time Frames

English

Prof. Yair Reisner. Windows of opportunity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Right timing is in all things
the most important factor.

---Hesiod (about 800 BC)


Everyone, from professional athletes to stock market investors to politicians, can tell you that timing is crucial. A path to the goal clears for a split second, a window of opportunity opens for buying or selling, the time is ripe to pass a law or sign a treaty. In the medicine of the future, when tissues and organs are grown specifically for transplants, doctors may also need to pay careful attention to timing. Prof. Yair Reisner of the Institute’s Immunology Department has found that the successful transplantation of tissues from developing organs may depend on zeroing in on a window of opportunity.

 

For over two decades scientists, Reisner among them, have been investigating the possibility of transplanting tissues from embryonic pigs into humans. Such “grown-to-order” organs might have the potential to resolve the pressing shortage of available transplant organs and could conceivably bypass problems associated with rejection. New tissues might be used to treat a host of diseases, as well. Experiments have been performed, for instance, on transplanting pancreatic tissue from embryonic pigs to treat type 1 diabetes. Yet the results of experimental attempts at such implantation have been unsatisfactory.

 

In the developing embryo, tissues become increasingly differentiated as the various organs form. Starting with the earliest embryonic stem cells, which literally have the potential to form any kind of tissue, each generation of cells gradually becomes more and more “locked” into becoming one kind of tissue, to the exclusion of other kinds. If tissues are transplanted at too early a stage, when they are still relatively undifferentiated, there is a risk that they will develop into teratomas – potentially malignant tumors. However, wait too long to transfer organs from one animal to another, and the tissues will already have developed identifiers that are likely to trigger rejection in the new host.

 

 

Pancreatic tissue after transplant

 

“Basically, there is a complex interplay between three parameters,” says Reisner. “There is the risk of teratoma, the risk of graft rejection and the stage at which the transplant organs will grow best.” Generally, tissues harvested earlier are less likely to be rejected. In previous research, Reisner and his team had demonstrated that miniature, fully functioning pig and human kidneys could be grown in mice from transplanted embryonic tissue. By using mice that were bred to have inactive immune systems, thereby preventing rejection, the team discovered the earliest point in time that affords perfect growth without the risk of teratomas forming. They determined that the ideal time slots to harvest pig and human embryonic kidneys were at four and seven weeks of gestation, respectively. 

 

In recent experiments, Reisner and his research team transplanted tissues from pig embryos, again into immunodeficient mice, and waited to see how they developed. They found that each type of organ has its own window of opportunity during which transplantation is more likely to succeed. Reisner’s findings appeared in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA.

 

The liver, for instance, was the earliest to reach its optimal stage of growth and function – combined with a lowered risk of teratoma formation – at four weeks. The window of opportunity for transplanting the pancreas opened two weeks later, at six weeks, and closed around week ten. After this date, the insulin-secreting capacity of transplanted pancreatic tissues began to decline. The development of mature lung tissue, with all the necessary elements for a fully functioning respiratory system, occurred relatively late in gestation. This sequence of the opening and closing of time windows seems to follow the normal order of embryonic development, in which the liver and pancreas are the first to develop, and the lungs last.

 

“Disappointing results in past transplantation trials may be explained, at least in part, by these findings,” says Reisner. “The attempts to cure diabetes, for instance, made use of late gestational organs but, according to the results of this study, they may have had a much higher success rate if tissues had been taken from younger embryos.” With this study, the idea of growing tissues and organs for transplantation may have come one step closer to becoming reality.   

 

Prof. Yair Reisner’s research is supported by the M.D. Moross Institute for Cancer Research; the Abisch Frenkel Foundation for the Promotion of Life Sciences; Richard M. Beleson; Renee Companez; the Crown Endowment Fund for Immunological Research; Erica A. Drake; Ligue Nationale Francaise Contre le Cancer; Mr. and Mrs. Barry Reznik; the Gabrielle Rich Center for Transplantation Biology Research; the Union Bank of Switzerland Optimus Foundation; the Belle S. and Irving E. Meller Center for the Biology of Aging; the J & R Center for Scientific Research; the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research-Weizmann Institute of Science Exchange Program; and the Loreen Arbus Foundation. Prof. Reisner is the incumbent of the Henry H. Drake Professorial Chair in Immunology.

 
Prof. Yair Reisner. Perfect timing
Life Sciences
English

Disarming the Alarm

English
 
Cohen and Shai. Evading immune response
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
One of the mysteries surrounding HIV infection is how the virus manages to hide out in the very immune system cells that are meant to protect the body from harmful invaders. How does the virus prevent these cells from mounting a full-scale attack? In the 22 years since the virus that causes AIDS was identified, much progress has been made in documenting how it breaks into the host cell and reproduces once inside the cell; but many questions remain to be answered. A team of Weizmann Institute scientists has added another piece to the puzzle by showing how a part of a protein on the virus’ outer surface interferes with the cells’ normal immune response. But their work may have wider implications: This molecular fragment, which has such a devastating effect in the case of AIDS, might turn out to be an effective treatment for some chronic disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis. The results of this study were recently published in the Journal of Clinical Investigation.
 
HIV infection begins when the protein coatings of viruses fuse with the outer membranes of T cells - members of the primary response team of the immune system. T cells recognize the presence of foreign invaders and alert other types of immune cells to come to the rescue. The genetic material of the virus, which is basically a strand of RNA, forces the cell’s DNA to make copies of it, and the newly minted viruses created by the host DNA later break out of the cell membrane and infect other cells. Many scientists believed that the very act of breaking into T cells and hijacking their DNA was enough to destroy the ability of these cells to call up immune system reinforcements. But Institute scientists Prof. Yechiel Shai of the Biological Chemistry Department, Prof. Irun Cohen of the Immunology Department and graduate students Francisco Quintana and Doron Gerber thought there must be more to the story. T cells identify invaders using receptors, like security antennae, on their outer walls. Viruses, as well, have their own surface equipment for seeking out specific T cells. To the scientists it seemed unlikely that such a virus would be invisible to the T cell - able to slip past its ever-watchful receptors without raising the alarm. They surmised that the virus must actively disable some part of the immune cell’s system.
 
They investigated a protein fragment called FP (fusion peptide), which is an active segment of an HIV protein called gp41 found on the outer envelope of the virus. FP was known to play a role in the complex process by which the viral envelope fuses with the cell membrane in the initial stage of cell infection. The researchers suspected that FP, though it is exposed for only a short period during this process, might have enough time, as well as the capability, to deactivate some of the cell’s intruderalert apparatus on its way in. Indeed, they found that FP locks on to several proteins on the cell walls that are involved in invoking a large-scale immune response, effectively shutting them down.
 
Armed with their new understanding of how a tiny virus can gain control of the body’s immune response, the scientists made an intuitive leap. Could FP, on its own, be an effective tool for controlling harmful immune system activity?
 
Receptor and protein
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
In autoimmune diseases, the same T cells that play host to HIV are overactive, mistakenly attacking the body’s cells instead of foreign invaders. The researchers theorized that, since FP selectively blocks one type of immune response, maybe it could be used in a beneficial manner to override the cells’ misguided call for help in cases of autoimmune disease. To check this theory, the research team tested FP on rats suffering from an autoimmune syndrome similar to human rheumatoid arthritis. As they predicted, the rats treated with FP showed a significant reduction in joint swelling and other symptoms of arthritis.
 
Shai points out that using FP, a tiny piece of HIV, would pose no danger to patients as it lacks the ability to either infect cells or reproduce. Indeed, as the scientists note in their paper, the study of a destructive virus may contain important lessons for medical science on how to regulate the immune system. “Perhaps,” says Cohen, “we can adopt the virus peptide to help control overactive autoimmunity.”
 
Prof. Yechiel Shai’s research is supported by the Robert Koch Minerva Center for Research in Autoimmune Disease and the Estate of Julius and Hanna Rosen. Prof. Shai is the incumbent of the Harold S. and Harriet B. Brady Professorial Chair in Cancer Research.
 
Prof. Irun Cohen’s research is supported by Minna James Heineman Stiftung; the Robert Koch Minerva Center for Research in Autoimmune Disease; and Mr. and Mrs. Samuel Theodore Cohen. Prof. Cohen is the incumbent of the Helen and Morris Mauerberger Professorial Chair in Immunology.
 
Illusteration: HIV at the cell membrane
Life Sciences
English

The Fat Factor

English

Prof. Michael Walker. Blood sugar and fat

 

Diabetes has become epidemic in the Western world: One out of 12 suffers from type 2 (adult onset) diabetes, and the number of diabetics (presently 150 million worldwide) is expected to double in the next 20 years. Though studies have laid the blame on the growing obesity scourge, the reasons for the strong correlation between excess body fat and diabetes have been puzzling scientists. New research at the Weizmann Institute and in Sweden has revealed exactly how one protein’s response to fat in the bloodstream contributes to the disease.
 
Type 2 diabetes is a complex disorder characterized by the body’s inability to utilize sugar efficiently. Two stages of the disease have been identified: In the first, “silent” stage, the body’s cells lose their ability to respond properly to the crucial hormone, insulin, responsible for moving sugar from the blood into cells. If sugar remains in the bloodstream, the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas compensate by stepping up production. Eventually this leads to beta cell exhaustion, reduced insulin output and the appearance of full-blown diabetes.
 
Elevated fat in the bloodstream appears to accelerate both stages of the disease. Exactly how does this happen? Beta cells are attuned to changes in blood sugar levels, responding to after-meal surges with a sharp increase in insulin production. But a recently discovered protein, a receptor on the surface of the beta cell called GPR40, responds not to sugar, but to fatty acids. When fat is present in addition to sugar, the GPR40 receptor causes an even higher spike in insulin output. If beta cells are frequently overstimulated and overworked, persistently elevated insulin levels may hasten the onset of the disease.
 
To investigate GPR40’s role, Prof. Michael Walker and students Nir Rubins and Reut Bartoov-Shifman of the Weizmann Institute’s Biological Chemistry Department teamed up with Prof. Helena Edlund and postdoctoral fellow Dr. Per Steneberg of the University of Umea in Sweden. Together, they developed two types of lab mice with modified GPR40 activity. In the first, the scientists used a technique known as gene knockout to prevent production of the GPR40 receptor. In the second type, overactive GPR40 genes created a surfeit of fat-signaling receptors that tricked the beta cells into sensing high fatty acid levels, even on a normal diet.
 
Throughout the trial, the GPR40 knockout mice remained healthy, apparently suffering no adverse effects from the deletion of the receptor, even when the fat content of their diet was raised substantially. In contrast, normal mice on a high-fat diet displayed typical symptoms of the first stage of diabetes. But strikingly, in the animals with extra GPR40 receptors, the disease progression was swift: They soon began to exhibit the classic symptoms of full-blown diabetes, including failure of the beta cells to produce adequate amounts of insulin.
 
Walker: “Our results establish GPR40 as an important link between obesity and diabetes. This gives us a new tool to combat the diabetes epidemic: It might be possible in the future to treat the condition using drugs that block the action of this receptor.”
 
Prof. Michael Walker’s research is supported by the Laufer Charitable Trust; Ellen Rosenthal; and Mitchell and Cynthia Caplan. Prof. Walker is the incumbent of the Marvin Myer and Jenny Cyker Professorial Chair for Diabetes Research.
Prof. Michael Walker. Linking fat to disease
Life Sciences
English

Slow Release

English

Hundreds of potential drugs never make it to the clinic because they don’t stay in the body long enough to do their job. Small proteins shown to be effective against disease are often cleared by the kidneys within minutes and therefore cannot serve as drugs. Now Weizmann Institute scientists have developed a new strategy that could turn numerous small proteins and protein fragments into potent drugs.

 

 Shechter, Tsubery and Fridkin. PEGs keep drugs in the body

The plan consists of dramatically increasing the protein’s mass. Like a sprinter weighed down by a heavy load, the modified protein finds its movement restricted; it is not whisked away by the kidneys and can stay in the bloodstream for hours. This approach is based on a method known as PEGylation: several chains of polyethylene glycol, or PEGs, are attached to the protein. PEGylation has been around for nearly two decades, but it hasn’t been widely used to turn small proteins into drugs because it comes with a catch: the same chains that make the protein heavy may also render it nearly useless; they take up its active sites, hindering its healing action in the body.

 

The new Weizmann Institute strategy, which can be described as “reversible PEGylation,” overcomes this problem. The protein is PEGylated with chainlike structures held in place by reversible chemical bonds that dissolve in the bloodstream. Once the chains fall off, the protein’s medicinal action is restored. Moreover, the chains do not all dissolve at once, so the active protein is released in a slow, continuous and predictable manner – an ideal way to provide a steady supply of the drug for optimal effect. The approach was developed by Prof. Yoram Shechter of the Biological Chemistry Department, Prof. Mati Fridkin of the Organic Chemistry Department and Dr. Haim Tsubery of both departments.
 

Potential protein drugs treated with the new approach have already been shown to be effective in laboratory animals. A single injection of a protein fragment drug that reduces blood glucose levels in rodents with Type 2 diabetes was effective for three days. A single injection of a reversibly PEGylated growth hormone, a small protein, corrected the effects of growth-hormone deficiency in rats over a period of four days. And the activity span of a short-lived protein fragment that may be extremely useful in the treatment of obesity and related disorders was extended dramatically following PEGylation by the new method.
 

Several companies with protein drugs in the pipeline have already expressed interest in the new strategy. Yeda Research and Development Co. Ltd., the Institute’s technology transfer arm, has filed a patent application for the approach.   

 

Prof. Mati Fridkin’s research is supported by the Helen and Martin Kimmel Center for Molecular Design; the Paul Godfrey Foundation; the Philip M. Klutznick Fund for Research; the Levine Institute of Applied Science; the Dr. Ernst Nathan Fund for Biomedical Research; and Mr. and Mrs. Luis Stillmann, Mexico. Prof. Fridkin is the incumbent of the Lester B. Pearson Professorial Chair of Protein Research.

 

Prof. Yoram Shechter’s research is supported by the Levine Institute of Applied Science and the Howard M. Siegler Foundation. Prof. Shechter is the incumbent of the Charles H. Hollenberg Professorial Chair of Diabetes and Metabolic Research.

 
Chemistry
English

Cancer Therapy Penetrates Bone

English
 
When prostate cancer, one of the most lethal cancers, spreads in the body, it most often targets bone. Difficult to treat, such metastasis is implicated in over 70% of prostate cancer deaths. A new therapy crosses bone barriers.
 
Prof. Zelig Eshhar, Head of the Immunology Department at the Weizmann Institute of Science, previously developed prostate-cancer-fighting cells, dubbed T bodies, which are modified immune system cells customized to be highly effective in identifying and destroying cancer cells. However, T bodies were unable to effectively penetrate bone. The Weizmann team, which included Dr. Jehonathan Pinthus of Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, implemented a pre-treatment consisting of either low doses of radiation or a specific chemotherapy drug, followed by T body injections. The pre-treatments caused some disruption in the bone marrow, the intended target of the T bodies, which responded with a chemical distress signal that alerted the immune cells, aided them in locating the problem area and enabled them to pass through barriers into the bone marrow tissue.
 
Mice treated with either therapy showed a significant drop in the tumor marker PSA (an indicator of cancer levels), a reduction in the tumor load and prolonged survival. This method holds promise for treating disseminated cancers that are resistant to other forms of therapy. 
 
Prof. Zelig Eshhar’s research is supported by the M.D. Moross Institute for Cancer Research; the Crown Endowment Fund for Immunological Research; the Estate of Irene Kuhn and Lotte Stern, UK; and the Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Fund for the Molecular Genetics of Cancer. Prof. Eshhar is the incumbent of the Marshall and Renette Ezralow Professorial Chair of Chemical and Cellular Immunology.
Life Sciences
English

Fighting the Flu

English

Prof. Ruth Arnon and Dr. Tamar Ben-Yedidia. multi-year vaccine

Viruses are exceptionally efficient creatures. They’re not even really “alive” in one sense, lacking a reproductive mechanism of their own. And yet they multiply so effectively - at the expense of their host cells - that they often kill in the process.


It’s a sneaky business, based on a key-fits-locks mechanism. The virus first anchors onto its host, whereupon a protein in its envelope attaches to a fitting receptor on the cell membrane. Having gained access to the cell’s headquarters - its nucleus - the virus incorporates its genetic material into the host’s DNA machinery, causing it to produce hordes of the invading viral particles.


Scientists working to block viral diseases are developing vaccines aimed at preventing this initial anchoring. The accepted approach involves introducing a weakened or killed virus, which the immune system learns to recognize, generating defensive antibodies. Future encounters with a live virus will trigger a swift immune response.


But viruses don’t just sit back and take it. In a rapid evolutionary process, they frequently change their surface protein “keys,” thus evading discovery - it’s similar to an ongoing struggle between code makers and code breakers.


The flu virus, for example, changes the shape of its envelope proteins almost annually - making effective vaccines nearly useless the following year. But Prof. Ruth Arnon and Dr. Tamar Ben-Yedidia of the Institute’s Immunology Department might now change this.


The scientists focused on one of the surface proteins of the flu virus, called hemagglutinin, which consists of three molecular chains wrapped around one another like rose petals. When the virus anchors itself on a living cell, these “petals” open to reveal a previously hidden peptide, which - the scientists found to their surprise - is unvaried across a range of viral strains. In other words, while hemagglutinin frequently changes its external petal-structured envelope to avoid detection, the hidden peptide has remained conserved throughout evolution. BINGO! - a potential Achilles’ heel has been uncovered. By targeting this fixed “weak link” of the virus, the scientists reasoned, it might be possible to develop a vaccine that would deliver a long-lasting - rather than merely annual - blow.


And lab results suggest that they are right on the mark. Working with (then graduate student) Dr. Rafi Levy, Arnon introduced a molecule containing one of the hidden peptides into mice. The result: 50 percent of the vaccinated mice showed resistance to infection by a range of flu viral strains. The results were even more telling when the mice were treated with vaccines containing three different “hidden” peptides: 90 percent of them demonstrated immunity. Moreover, even seven months later, 50 percent remained protected.


Encouraged by these findings, Arnon and Ben-Yedidia started examining the immune response of mice implanted with a human immune system. They used a new vaccine consisting of four different “hidden” peptides intended to provoke an immune response in humans. Though subsequently infected with a very large, usually fatal, dose of the virus, all of the mice survived.


Following these successful studies in mice, BiondVax, a recently established start-up, now plans to continue the development of this approach and perform clinical trials in humans. The goal is to design a five-year nose-drop vaccine that would be effective for people of all ages. “It’s an entirely different concept from existing vaccines,” Arnon says. “The nose-drop vaccine - of which only a single drop will be needed - should effectively target a range of flu virus strains.”

Flu virus and hemagglutinin protein. Viral weak link

 

Not the common cold


The flu (or influenza) virus is different from the common cold. It attacks the respiratory tract (nose, throat and lungs) and usually comes on suddenly. Resulting symptoms include a fever, headache, congestion and muscle aches.


Most flu strains are mild, meaning that they have at least a few familiar features that our immune system recognizes and is able to fight - generally involving a recovery period of one to two weeks. Yet even with these mild flu strains, some people develop life-threatening complications, such as pneumonia - indeed, influenza annually claims the lives of roughly 36,000 people in the United States alone. Those at higher risk include toddlers, the elderly and people with chronic medical conditions, such as diabetes, asthma and heart disease.


Rarely, extremely virulent flu strains crop up that are so different in their genetic make-up our immune system is completely helpless - as in the pandemic of 1918, which killed between 20 and 40 million people around the world. One story tells of four ladies who were healthy enough to play bridge together into the night. Three of them were dead by the morning.


Prof. Arnon’s research is supported by the Y. Leon Benoziyo Institute for Molecular Medicine; the Milton A. and Charlotte R. Kramer Foundation; Mr. and Mrs. Eugene Applebaum, Bloomfield Hills, MI; Lester and Evelyn Burton, Bingham Farms, MI; Dr. and Mrs. Claude Oster, Bloomfield Hills, MI and Dr. and Mrs. Irving Slott, Chicago, IL. She is the incumbent of the Paul Ehrlich Professorial Chair of Immunology.

 

 
Prof. Ruth Arnon and Dr. Tamar Ben-Yedidia. Supervaccine
Life Sciences
English

Stem Cells On Call

English
 
They still don't have a personality and they're waiting for the maturity call. Stem cells in our bone marrow usually develop into blood cells, replenishing our blood system. However, in an emergency, the destiny of some of these stem cells may change: They can become virtually any type of cell – liver cells, muscle cells, nerve cells – in response to the body's needs.
 
Prof. Tsvee Lapidot and Dr. Orit Kollet of the Weizmann Institute's Immunology Department have found how the liver, when damaged, sends a cry for help to these stem cells. They discovered that certain molecules governing normal development of the liver become overproduced when it is damaged, signaling to the stem cells in the bone marrow to come to the site. The scientists were able to pinpoint the signaling molecules and describe the homing process.
 
The findings could lead to new insights into organ repair and transplants, especially liver-related ones. They may also point to a whole new stock of stem cells that can, under certain conditions, become liver cells. Until a few years ago, only embryonic stem cells were thought to possess such capabilities. Understanding how stem cells in the bone marrow turn into liver cells could one day be a great boon to liver repair as well as to stem cell research and therapy.
 
Prof. Lapidot's research was supported by the M.D. Moross Institute for Cancer Research; the Concern Foundation, Beverly Hills, CA; Ms. Rhoda Goldstein, Nanuet, NY; the Levine Institute of Applied Science; Ms. Nora Peisner, Hungtington, MI; and the Gabrielle Rich Center for Transplantation Biology Research.
Life Sciences
English

Pages