<p>
Science Feature Articles</p>

A Super Surprise

English
 

Prof. Dan Shahar and Maoz Ovadia. Superconductor's twin

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tension between opposites is one of the pillars of human culture – from the evil counterparts of the good and all-powerful God in Western religions to Through the Looking Glass, in which Alice enters a world that is the exact opposite of the one in which we live.

The natural world is filled with opposing pairs: molecular “twins” that are identical in composition but oriented in diametrically opposite directions, like left and right hands, or elementary anti-matter particles that equal their matter counterparts in everything except their opposite charge. Still, Prof. Dan Shahar of the Condensed Matter Physics Department was surprised to discover a duality phenomenon that no one had observed before.
 
Shahar studies superconductivity, which takes place when a conductor – a metal or a ceramic material – is cooled to an extremely low temperature, such that its resistance drops to zero. When a material loses all its resistance, it allows electrical current to flow forever without charging it any “commission.”
 
Superconductivity occurs only at certain temperatures and when the material is somewhat orderly. One intriguing phenomenon takes place when a conductor becomes a superconductor – a relatively more orderly state – and later loses its superconducting ability, for example, due to heating. In this case, the material doesn’t return to its conductor state; rather, it becomes an insulator! This phenomenon is observed only when the disorder in the original conductor exceeds a certain level.
 
Shahar and his team decided to deprive a material of its superconducting ability in a different way: by activating a strong magnetic field. They created a superconductor from a material that was relatively disordered – though not disordered enough to cause the superconductor to turn into an insulator by heating – and placed it into a strong magnetic field. Next, they tested the current flowing through the material while gradually altering the strength of the magnetic field and the temperature. Much to their surprise, they discovered that at the point the material ceased being a superconductor, it became neither a regular conductor nor a regular insulator. Instead, the material entirely lost its ability to conduct any electrical current whatsoever. Shahar’s team, for the first time ever, was observing a superinsulator – the exact opposite of a superconductor.
 
The scientists still don’t understand superinsulation, which in the meantime has been discovered in a number of materials and observed in research institutions in other countries. This phenomenon might be connected to the fact that strong magnetic fields create a sort of a “magnetic whirlpool.” Theoretical physicists have proposed treating these whirlpools as particles, which in certain conditions respond to the current by generating great tension that results in superinsulation.
 
Whatever the explanation, much remains to be discovered in this area of research. Superinsulation today takes place at temperatures of 40 thousandths of a degree above absolute zero. If scientists one day succeed in creating superinsulators at room temperature, such materials could solve the problem of overheating in electronic components, making it possible to build transistors that don’t lose current and vastly increasing the durability of batteries.
 
 
(l-r) Prof. Dan Shahar and Maoz Ovadia. An exact opposite
Space & Physics
English

The Other Half

English

Barkai, Shilo and Ben-Zvi. Regeneration in proportion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

More than 80 years ago, the German scientist Hans Spemann conducted a famous experiment that laid the foundations for the field of embryonic development – research that would later earn him a Nobel Prize. After dividing a salamander embryo in half, Spemann noticed that one half – the ventral half that gives rise to the salamander’s “belly” – starts to wither away. However, the “back” (dorsal) half, from which the head, brain and spinal cord arise, continues to grow, regenerating the missing belly and developing into a complete – though small – embryo. Spemann then conducted another experiment. This time, he removed a few cells from the back half of one embryo and transplanted them into the belly half of a different embryo. To his surprise, the result was a Siamese twin embryo with an extra head generated from the transplanted cells. Although the resulting embryo was smaller than normal, all its tissues and organs developed in the right proportions, and they functioned properly.

 
How does this happen? How exactly is half an embryo able to maintain its tissues and organs in the correct proportions even though it’s smaller than normal? Despite the attention this question has received in the ensuing years, it has remained unanswered – until now. Four scientists – Prof.  Naama Barkai and research student Danny Ben-Zvi of the Molecular Genetics Department, and Prof. Ben-Zion Shilo, Dean of the Faculty of Biochemistry, together with Prof. Abraham Fainsod of the Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Medicine, Jerusalem – have finally discovered the mechanisms involved.
 
The scientists knew that the growth and development of cells and organs within the embryo are linked to a unique group of substances called morphogens. Morphogens are produced in one particular area of the embryo, and from there they spread throughout the entire embryo in varying concentrations. Scientists have begun to realize that the different morphogen levels themselves contain information, and that the fate of embryo cells – the specific type of tissue and organ they are eventually going to develop into – is determined by the amount of the morphogen they come into contact with. But how those concentrations are determined in a way that maintains organ proportions is a question that remained unanswered.

 

 

 

Tadpole with two heads
 
The idea for the present research came about when Barkai and her colleagues developed a mathematical model to describe the interactions that occur within an embryo’s gene networks. In this model, the dorsal side contains all the morphogens needed for organ development, while the ventral side has none.
 
The data suggest that morphogens become unevenly distributed in the embryo in a different way than previously thought. The team predicted that an inhibitor molecule secreted from a localized source on one side of the embryo binds the morphogen and acts as a type of ferry for “shuttling” it over to the other side. According to the model, the interactions between the two substances determine the morphogen concentration in any location, enabling the embryo to preserve the relative proportion of its organs. Barkai and her team then tested and validated their predictions in experiments conducted on frog embryos.
 
The importance of the role of these morphogenic substances, as well as their mechanism of action, is evidenced by the fact that they have been conserved throughout evolution: Variants can be found in species ranging from worms to fruit flies to higher species, including humans. Understanding the processes that govern embryonic cell development, therefore, could have many implications. For example, it could lead, in the future, to the development of new ways to repair injured tissue.
 

A Piece of Work

 

When Hamlet said “What a piece of work is man,” he had no idea how right he was: The human body has trillions of living cells that make up several hundred tissues and organs. Each one of these cells is more sophisticated than the most powerful computer; the transportation and communications systems in a single cell are more complex than those of a mid-sized city. And all of this is run by 30,000 genes that manage everything from embryonic development to aging and death.
 
How is this colossal undertaking coordinated? What are the basic rules governing life? Life scientists have struggled with these questions for decades, but they have recently been joined by physicists who, until a few years ago, were mainly investigating phenomena in non-living materials. Physicists such as Prof. Naama Barkai bring to this effort a new set of research tools and new approaches, many of them particularly well adapted to sorting out complex systems. No less importantly, they come with new ways of thinking that lead them to ask novel questions and follow fresh paths of inquiry.
 
Much of this work involves mapping such large, tangled, multi-scale gene networks as those that manage embryonic development, intercellular communication or the processes within cells that are involved in diseases such as cancer. As the models of these networks become ever more precise, they provide scientists with ever better methods for approaching those basic questions about the nature of life, as well as practical tools for biomedical applications.
 
 Prof. Naama Barkai’s research is supported by the Kahn Family Foundation for Humanitarian Support; the Helen and Martin Kimmel Award for Innovative Investigation; the Carolito Stiftung; the Minna James Heineman Stiftung; the PW-Iris Foundation; and the PW-Jani. M Research Fund.
 
Prof. Ben-Zion Shilo’s research is supported by the Y. Leon Benoziyo Institute for Molecular Medicine; the J&R Center for Scientific Research; the Jeanne and Joseph Nissim Foundation for Life Sciences Research; and the Mary Ralph Designated Philanthropic Fund. Prof. Shilo is the incumbent of the Hilda and Cecil Lewis Professorial Chair of Molecular Genetics.

 

(l-r) Prof. Naama Barkai, Prof. Ben-Zion Shilo and Danny Ben-Zvi. All in proportion
Life Sciences
English

Learning the Language

English

Dr. Nir Friedman. Eavesdropping on the immune system

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

When learning a new language, it’s hard enough trying to follow a conversation between two native speakers, but when one is in a room full of natives all speaking at once, it can be nearly impossible. Dr. Nir Friedman of the Weizmann Institute of Science’s Immunology Department knows only too well how difficult this can be: The molecular “language” of the immune cells he studies is “spoken” only in extremely noisy crowds.

When faced with a challenge such as an infection or cancer, the body’s corps of immune cells cooperate with one another in launching a coordinated counterattack. “Instructions” are passed down from one immune cell “rank” to another, and each type of immune cell carries out its specific “orders.” These instructions, however, are passed through molecules like cytokines – small proteins that carry information. But there is so much background “chatter,” it is difficult for scientists to understand exactly what is going on – which cell is “talking” to which, and how the molecular instructions they exchange get translated into cellular responses. To grasp the process, scientists just learning the language would prefer to narrow their observations down to single cells – in essence, to “listen” to just one cell at a time.

Although he is a physicist by training, Friedman was attracted to the life sciences; he wanted to apply experimental and theoretical tools from physics to the study of biological systems. During his postdoctoral studies at Harvard University, he and his colleagues developed a new method for detecting protein production that is so sensitive it can pick out single molecules in the single cells of the bacterium Escherichia coli. While many of today’s researchers work with green fluorescent reporter genes that, when inserted into DNA, glow brightly upon activation, Friedman and his colleagues employed an enzyme called beta-galactosidase as a reporter. The fluorescence does not come from the reporter molecule itself; it is produced when the enzyme cleaves a second substrate. The enzyme can cleave many substrate molecules per second, thus amplifying weak signals from even tiny amounts of protein. Unfortunately, in the first trials, as soon as the fluorescent signals were produced, they were pumped out of the cell – too quickly to be detected. To circumvent the problem, the scientists employed sophisticated miniature devices etched with closed chambers to trap individual cells, thus keeping the signals in one place long enough to be detected.  

Now, at the Weizmann Institute, Friedman and his team intend to elaborate on the design of these artificial microenvironments so that they will finally be able to “listen in”  on individual cytokine “conversations.” His initial research will concentrate on T helper cells – a type of white blood cell that secretes the instruction-bearing cytokines. The questions he is asking: Why do some of these T cells possess receptors for their own cytokines, giving them the ability to respond to their own signals? What benefit does this provide to the system, and how does it influence the response? Could this mean the response is all-or-nothing?

Combining these newly developed techniques with mathematical modeling and quantitative analyses may allow the scientists to predict how the cells will respond under varying conditions. These mathematical generalizations could then help shed light on processes concerning cell types other than T cells. Once the scientists are able to grasp basic “words” of the cytokine “language” from listening to individual cells, they hope to be more adventurous and open some of the chambers in the miniature devices, allowing more cells to “talk” to each other, even eavesdropping on the “chatter” of the crowd to hear what it can tell them.
 

Crossroads

Born in Tel Aviv, Dr. Nir Friedman received a B.Sc. in physics and mathematics from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in 1989, via the prestigious “Talpiot” army study program. During his IDF service, he conducted M.Sc. studies in physics at Tel Aviv University, earning his degree in 1996. Friedman completed his Ph.D. studies under the guidance of Prof. Nir Davidson of the Weizmann Institute’s Physics of Complex Systems Department in 2001; he then stayed on as a postdoctoral fellow for two years in the lab of Prof. Joel Stavans of the same Department. He went on to spend four years as a postdoctoral fellow at Harvard University with Prof. Sunney Xie. In September 2007, Friedman joined the Weizmann Institute’s Immunology Department as a senior scientist. He is the recipient of a number of prestigious fellowships and awards, including the 2007 Career Development Award from the Human Frontier Science Program and the Weizmann Institute’s 2007 Sir Charles Clore Prize.

Friedman is married and is the father of three children. His hobbies include photography, listening to jazz and playing the drums in a jazz band.

Dr. Nir Friedman’s research is supported by the Sir Charles Clore Research Prize; the Crown Endowment Fund for Immunological Research; and the Abisch-Frenkel Foundation for the Promotion of Life Sciences.

 
 
 
Dr. Nir Friedman.
Life Sciences
English

Right On Target

English
 

Dr. Avraham Yaron. biological GPS for growing axons

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

It’s an electrical engineer’s nightmare: a complex “wiring system” of nerve fibers that connects more than 100 billion nerve cells in the brain to one another and to the rest of the nervous system. These nerve fibers, called axons, are often up to several feet in length, and they must grow out to their targets bit by bit, making their way through surrounding tissues and around a myriad of obstacles. How do the growing axons find their intended connection without getting lost along the way?

Dr. Avraham Yaron of the Biological Chemistry Department is trying to elucidate the mechanisms that guarantee the proper wiring of these billions of nerve cells during the development of the fetal nervous system. Such discoveries could one day lead to ways of alleviating or curing ailments tied to nerve fiber injury or wiring defects.

Over the past decade, it’s become clear that growing axons are guided by a sort of biological “GPS system.” It’s not satellite signals that help the axons navigate their way around the nervous system, however, but chemical guidance cues. These cues can work in two ways to ensure that the axons “take the right road”: Their signals can be attractive – like neon lights luring the axons toward the right target; or they can be repellent – acting as “roadblocks” to prevent axons from making a wrong turn. Scientists have already described several major families of guidance molecules, each of which seems to work in a different way. But little is known about the way this elaborate chemical guidance system actually operates.

Yaron mainly researches the guidance of sensory axons – those nerve extensions that transmit sensations of pain, heat and touch from the skin to the brain. These axons are guided in their development by an important family of guidance cues, the semaphorins. However, just as in GPS systems, it appears that axons need a “receiver” to detect the guidance signals. The axons’ receivers are protein receptors located on their outer surface.



During his postdoctoral studies, Yaron had identified two members of the family of sensory axon receptors – the plexin family – which are essential for receiving the signals from the semaphorins. Now, in his lab in the Weizmann Institute, he seeks to further clarify how signals are transmitted through these receptors. He also aims to identify new guidance cues and investigate how all the different cues are integrated.



To do this, Yaron and his team employ two complementary approaches. In the first, conducted in lab cultures, they can manipulate and expose the axons to different guidance cues, observing their effects at a basic level. They also use mouse models, in which they try to validate their in vitro results, as well as controlling various additional factors to analyze the behavior of axons in a more complex, real-life setting. So far, preliminary results suggest that the semaphorin guidance cues and plexin receptors work together to transmit repelling signals. This is evident from the scientists’ observations that in the presence of the receptor, the axons grow in stereotypical fashion toward their correct targets, but when the scientists knock out the receptor genes, effectively removing the roadblock, the axons lose their way and grow in all different directions.



One particular project in Yaron’s lab has clinical relevance: It focuses on diabetes neuropathy. In people with diabetes, as well as some cancer patients treated with chemotherapy, sensing axons may become disconnected from their targets, leading to severe pain in the extremities. Yaron is trying to discover whether the developmental guidance molecules might play a role in these pathological conditions. If this is indeed the case, understanding how they work could provide a novel solution to these conditions, for which there is currently no effective treatment.



Recent evidence suggests that chemical guidance cues play a role in many additional processes – for example, in the growth of new blood vessels, cell migration in the immune system and cancer. Thus, in addition to addressing significant basic research questions on axon guidance, Yaron’s discoveries could also yield insights in many other fields of biology.   

 
Sensory axons in a transgeneic mouse
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On Track

 

 

Born in Jerusalem, Dr. Avraham Yaron earned a B.Sc. in biology from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in 1993. He then went on directly to a Ph.D. program in the Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Medicine Department of Immunology and received his degree in 1999. “Ever since childhood, I have always been interested in science, yet it was only during my Ph.D. that it became absolutely clear to me that I wanted to pursue science as a career and have my own lab,” says Yaron. His Ph.D. thesis earned him the 2000 Amersham/Pharmacia Biotech prize for young scientists awarded by Science magazine. Yaron then conducted postdoctoral studies in the laboratory of Prof. Marc Tessier-Lavigne at the University of California, San Francisco, where he was first introduced to research on the mechanisms of axon guidance and made his discovery of the plexin receptors. Yaron joined the Weizmann Institute as a senior scientist in 2006.

 

Dr. Avraham Yaron’s research is supported by the Nella and Leon Benoziyo Center for Neurosciences; the Estelle Funk Foundation President’s Fund for Biomedical Research; the Dr. Ernst Nathan Fund for Biomedical Research; the Robert Rees Applied Research Fund; and the Henry S. and Anne S. Reich Research Fund for Mental Health.

 
Dr. Avraham Yaron. sensory neuron guidance system
Life Sciences
English

Safety Catch

English
 

Gradus, Fainzilber and Yudin. Nerve signals by rail

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

Sensations like pain or heat travel in a fraction of a second along the extensions – the axons – of nerve cells, an impressive feat considering that axons such as those that run from the base of the spine all the way down the leg can reach over a meter in length – 40,000 times longer than their width. But when a nerve cell is injured somewhere along its length, a different kind of signal must be sent – one that more closely resembles a mechanical railway car than an electrical impulse. Thus getting the call for help back to the remote cell nucleus is something like sending a message by boxcar to headquarters halfway across the state.



Prof. Michael Fainzilber of the Weizmann Institute’s Biological Chemistry Department has been investigating emergency transportation systems in nerve cells. His previous research had shown that this information is packaged in a molecular “railcar” complex: A motor protein called dynein works together with importins to move the complex along microtubule “tracks.” The importins are nuclear import proteins that ferry various molecules in and out of the nucleus, thus delivering the message straight to the command center of the cell.



Fainzilber and research students Dmitry Yudin and Shlomit Hanz, working in collaboration with the group of Dr. Jeffrey Twiss (Nemours Institute, Wilmington, DE) wanted to know what controls the triggering of this system right after injury, as it gears up for the long journey. Using rat sciatic nerves as their model, the scientists looked for changes in the molecular makeup up of the nerve cell material around the injury site. Their findings recently appeared in Neuron.



To their surprise, they found molecules that until now were believed to exist only around the cell nucleus. These molecules, known collectively as the Ran system, are found in two main configurations, one inside the nucleus and one outside, and they help to control the importins’ molecule-ferrying activities through gates in the walls surrounding the nucleus. The research team found that the nuclear form of Ran sits on the axonal complex, preventing importins from coupling with the rest of the transport machinery. When damage occurs, Ran is switched to the second configuration, which causes it to disengage. The waiting importin can then plug into the machinery, and the expedition gets under way.



The researchers believe the Ran system works like a safety catch – preventing unwanted activation of the alarm machinery until an actual emergency occurs, and then switching quickly to allow efficient triggering of the system. Understanding this mechanism may help devise ways by which nerve cells can be induced to repair damage and may aid in developing treatments for nerve injury in the future.




Prof. Michael Fainzilber’s research is supported by the M.D. Moross Institute for Cancer Research; the Nella and Leon Benoziyo Center for Neurological Diseases; the Dr. Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Medical Research Foundation; the PW-Bes Foundation; the European Union FP6 NEST Axon Support project; the J&R Center for Scientific Research; the Minerva Foundation; and the USA-Israel Binational Science Foundation. Prof. Fainzilber is the incumbent of the Chaya Professorial Chair for Molecular Neuroscience.

 

 

 

(l-r) Tal Gradus, Prof. Michael Fainzilber and Dmitry Yudin. Gearing up
Life Sciences
English

Good Migrations

English
 

Prof. Orly Reiner. Nerve Cells on the Move

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

One of the most fascinating aspects of embryonic development is the formation of the brain: Billions of newborn brain cells migrate to precise locations, where they begin sending out extensions and establishing connections – eventually creating the command and control apparatus that allows us to move, think and feel. Disruptions in these formative processes can lead to such disorders as schizophrenia, degenerative brain diseases and lissencephaly, or “smooth brain,” which causes severe mental retardation and premature death.



Prof. Orly Reiner of the Weizmann Institute’s Molecular Genetics Department searches for the genes responsible for brain development. She has recently focused on a gene called Par1, which makes an enzyme that regulates the shape and hardiness of nerve cell structures. In research reported in the Journal of Neuroscience, Reiner showed that the Par1 enzyme actively controls the migration of nerve cells in the course of embryonic development, and that its presence in the right amount is critical to the formation of normal brain structure.



In the first stage of the research, Dr. Tamar Sapir and students Sivan Sapoznik, Danit Finkelshtein and Anat Shmueli, and lab technician Talia Levy, working in Reiner’s lab, sought to check what happens when Par1 activity in the brain of the developing embryo is blocked. They injected short RNA molecules into the brains of embryonic mice that were designed to attach themselves to the Par1 gene and prevent it from making an active enzyme. In addition, the scientists equipped the cells with a gene manufacturing a fluorescent material that acts as a beacon, enabling them to track the cells’ migration.



The researchers discovered that blocking the Par1 gene delayed the migration of nerve cells. Whereas in the control mice these cells reached the outer layer of the cortex, in the mice that had their Par1 gene silenced, the nerve cells got “stuck” partway through their journey. The cells stopped short at a well-defined location – precisely the juncture at which they normally undergo structural changes.



Next, the scientists rescued the stuck nerve cells by introducing new copies of the Par1 gene using genetic engineering methods. The “rescue” worked only when the dose was precise: Excessive gene concentrations led to the creation of malformed, rounded cells that lacked the normal nerve cell extensions.



In an additional series of experiments, the researchers checked how exactly Par1 affects cell migration. Apparently, the gene regulates the stability of the cell’s supportive framework, the cytoskeleton. When Par1 is blocked, the cytoskeleton stiffens, making it difficult for the cell to move. In particular, the centrosome, the cytoskeleton’s central structure, which normally drives the cell forward, slows down and loses its precise sense of direction.



“Cell migration and structural changes are interconnected processes,” says Reiner. “Our findings indicate that Par1 links them together by exerting dual control – over the direction of the cell movement and the dynamics of the cell skeleton.” Reiner hopes that a deeper understanding of nerve cell migration will, in the future, help advance the treatment of diseases caused by faulty neurons. Such understanding, for example, could be crucial for developing therapies based on injecting healthy nerve cells into the sick brain and directing the cells precisely to the damaged area.   




Prof. Orly Reiner’s research is supported by the Nella and Leon Benoziyo Center for Neurological Diseases; the Kekst Family Center for Medical Genetics; the David and Fela Shapell Family Center for Genetic Disorders Research; and the PW-Iris Foundation. Prof. Reiner is the incumbent of the Bernstein-Mason Chair of Neurochemistry.

 
 
 
Prof. Orly Reiner. In the right measure
Life Sciences
English

Paint Power

English

Dr. Boris Rybtchinski. borrowing from biology

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

Alternative energy promises a bright future thanks, in part, to dark paint. Our buildings, cars, ships and airplanes could one day be powered by a thin coat of special paint that will convert solar energy to electricity or fuel. Preference will be given to dark hues, which are better at absorbing sunlight. Thus a new Ferrari might, alas, come in black instead of red.

Making such futuristic energy concepts a reality will take radically new scientific approaches. “We haven’t made much progress in our use of energy,” says Dr. Boris Rybtchinski of the Weizmann Institute’s Organic Chemistry Department. “Our resources of oil and coal are limited, yet we continue to burn these fossil fuels and pollute the environment. In the meantime, the world’s demand for energy is soaring and the threat of global warming looms. There’s a huge gap between the enormity of the problem and the progress in finding alternative energy sources. We badly need fresh, creative ideas.”

Rybtchinski’s team is working on one such idea. He draws his inspiration from photosynthesis, the process by which plants and certain bacteria convert sunlight into chemical energy by employing an organic “paint” – chlorophyll. Certain artificial pigments are already more effective than chlorophyll, but combining them into functional systems is no simple matter. Rybtchinski seeks to create “well-connected” molecular systems that will harvest sunlight in clever ways intended to generate solar electricity and fuels.

Solar cells, which convert sunlight into electricity, are already available commercially; but their use is limited, in part, by their high cost and the difficulty of storing the energy, as these cells work only when the sun shines. The storage problem could be overcome by converting sunlight into chemical energy. In other words, fuels might be created using sunlight – just what photosynthesis achieves in nature.

Rybtchinski seeks to build artificial photosynthetic systems from cheap and readily available organic materials. Such systems might be able to produce various fuels from freely available ingredients – for example, hydrogen from water, or methanol from water and carbon dioxide. Solar paint would be a type of artificial photosynthetic system.

Rybtchinski believes that a better understanding of natural photosynthesis, combined with advances in organic chemistry and nanotechnology, can lead to innovative solutions in this field of research. In his lab, one doesn’t see the familiar panels or mirrors of solar installations. In fact, without an electron microscope one doesn’t see much of anything at all, as his solar energy nano-systems measure only several millionths of a millimeter.

To manufacture these systems, he takes a cue from yet another natural process – self-assembly – which governs the emergence of biological systems, from proteins to living organisms. Water plays a key structural role in self-assembly: Various biological molecules are either repelled or attracted to water molecules, and this property determines their position in living cells and tissues. With the help of an array of advanced technologies, Rybtchinski uses sophisticated molecular methods to exploit the hydrophobic – that is, “water-hating” – properties of certain organic molecules, manipulating them to self-assemble into efficient solar-energy-converting units.

In one of their projects, Rybtchinski’s group builds molecular “wires” that must perform three types of function, in rising order of complexity: moving photons while absorbing the energy of sunlight (a step occurring at the beginning of photosynthesis); moving electrons to convey an electric current in solar cells; and, finally, moving both electrons and protons to generate solar fuels.

In parallel, Rybtchinski collaborates with a number of other Institute scientists on creating hybrid solar conversion systems composed of organic molecules, catalysts and nano-particles. “In this work, we are solving basic science questions that are key to finding practical alternative energy solutions,” he says. “The need to find such solutions is what ultimately motivates us all.”

The long-term goal is not just to achieve plants’ efficiency at using sunlight – already a formidable challenge – but to overtake them. “Plants don’t run around the way we do, so our energy needs are vastly higher,” Rybtchinski explains. “Therefore, we need to generate much more energy and with greater efficiency.”   

 On a Personal Note

Born in Kiev, Ukraine, Dr. Boris Rybtchinski received a B.Sc. in chemistry from Kiev State University in 1992. He then immigrated to Israel and, in 1993, embarked on graduate studies at the Weizmann Institute under the guidance of Prof. David Milstein. After serving in the medical corps of the Israel Defense Forces, he earned his Ph.D. with distinction in 2002. He conducted postgraduate research at Northwestern University for three years and joined the Weizmann faculty in the fall of 2005. He has received a number of prestigious awards, including the Sir Charles Clore Prize. He lives in Tel Aviv with his wife, Revital, whom he met when both were students at Weizmann, and their son, Gal, several months old. He enjoys sports and reading history books.
 

Dr. Boris Rybtchinski’s research is supported by the Helen and Martin Kimmel Center for Molecular Design; the Alternative Energy Research Initiative; Mr. and Mrs. Yossie Hollander, Israel; the Robert Rees Applied Research Fund; Sir Harry Djanogly, CBE, UK; and Mr. and Mrs. Larry Taylor, Los Angeles, CA. Dr. Rybtchinski is the incumbent of the Abraham and Jennie Fialkow Career Development Chair.

 
 
 
Dr. Boris Rybtchinski.
Environment
English

The Math of Survival

English

Dr. Eran Segal. fingering a cancer culprit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cancer can disappear, only to return at a later date – often in a more aggressive form. Scientists now believe this is due to the survival of small numbers of cancer stem cells – self-renewing cells that can jumpstart new cancer growth. A Weizmann Institute scientist, working with researchers at Stanford University, recently revealed a genetic program that cancer stem cells share with embryonic stem cells, endowing them with cancer-instigating properties.

Stem cells come in different versions, including the embryonic stems cells that give rise to all of the tissues in a developing embryo and the various kinds of adult stem cells that replenish the blood, skin or muscles. But what gives stem cells their “stemness”? Researchers looking at the activities of specific genes had come up with conflicting evidence: Many genes seem to act differently in different studies. Dr. Eran Segal of the Institute’s Computer Science and Applied Mathematics Department, Dr. Howard Chang of Stanford University and their colleagues realized that a method was needed to investigate whole groups of genes – which rarely act alone in nature – at once.

To explore these gene sets, or “modules,” the scientists used software called “Genomica,” developed by Segal and his team at the Institute, to map out patterns of gene activity in embryonic stem cells and adult stem cells, looking for common themes. They then compared their results to data sets on cancer stem cells to see if these cells used a similar program for activating sets of genes. The researchers also examined data on metastasis and survival rates in cancer patients, to check for correlations between the presence of cancer stem cells and prognosis.



Their computations showed that the patterns of gene activity in cancer stem cells closely resemble those of embryonic stem cells, and the results confirmed that their presence can spell bad news for cancer patients. The scientists then asked whether their findings might also reveal the workings of a “master gene” – one that sets the whole stem cell program in motion. Of a number of candidates for this position, one stood out: a gene called c-Myc that is known to be involved in the growth of cancer.



Is c-Myc a main culprit? To find out, the team injected human skin cells with elevated c-Myc activity into healthy mice. They found that this gene, alone, was able to turn the cells into embryonic stem-cell-like cancer cells. As few as 500 cells were enough to initiate cancer growth. “C-Myc may have a positive role to play in embryonic development,” says Segal, “but in cancer, it can be lethal.”

The findings may have a number of biomedical applications. They may enable cancer researchers, for instance, to create lines of genetically engineered cancer stem cells for research, as well as aid in the design of better diagnostic tools and, in the future, treatments that might keep cancer from recurring or spreading. 

 Dr. Eran Segal’s research is supported by the Willner Family Leadership Institute; the Abisch-Frenkel Foundation for the Promotion of Life Sciences; the Chais Family Fellows Program for New Scientists; the Hana and Julius Rosen Fund; the Arie and Ida Crown Memorial Charitable Fund; the Estelle Funk Foundation; and the Cecil and Hilda Lewis Charitable Trust. Dr. Segal is the incumbent of the Soretta and Henry Shapiro Career Development Chair.

 
 
 
Dr. Eran Segal. Finding a common theme
Math & Computer Science
English

Down the Line

English

Por. Ehud Shapiro. tracing cell lineage

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
A cell containing a certain mutation divides, and its daughter cells divide again. At some point down the line, one of the cell’s progeny acquires further mutations and begins to divide more rapidly. Later on, a mass of cells, descendants of the original cell, begins to threaten the life of the organism. When, during this progression, did the cancer begin? When did the tumor cells cross over from a premalignant state to malignancy? In which generation were the seeds of metastasis planted?
 
Through decades of cancer research, these questions have remained controversial, but a new technique developed at the Weizmann Institute may help scientists to sort out the progression of cancer from individual abnormal cells to full-blown cancer. Prof. Ehud Shapiro of the Biological Chemistry Department, and Computer Science and Applied Mathematics Department, together with doctoral students Dan Frumkin and Adam Wasserstrom and their colleagues, produced two complementary studies; the first describing a method of reconstructing a “family tree” for a cell in a larger organism such as a human, and the second reporting their findings when they applied this method to a cancer cell.
Dan Frumkin
 
Like people, the more closely related cells are to each other, the more alike they are. As the branches of the lineage tree spread out over hundreds and even thousands of generations, the cells’ genetic make-up drifts when they acquire mutations (usually harmless) and pass them on to their offspring. In previous research, Shapiro and his team had realized that certain repeating sequences of DNA called microsatellites tended to accumulate mutations at a more or less steady rate, and these could be used to accurately determine how closely cells were related – that is, how many generations back they had a common ancestor.
 
In the first study, which appeared in PLoS Computational Biology, Shapiro and his team investigated several different cell lineages in mice. By feeding the DNA sequences of these microsatellites into computer analysis algorithms they had developed, they were able to compare the average depth of the various cell lineages. They found, for instance, that B cells – a type of immune cell – undergo cell division about once a day. Adult stem cells, by contrast, divide less frequently. Studies such as these may eventually help to answer such questions as: “Do neurons in the brain regenerate?” or “Are new eggs created in adult female ovaries?”
 
 
Shapiro and his team, in collaboration with Prof. Gideon Rechavi from the Sheba Medical Center and others, then decided to apply this method to reconstruct, for the first time, the lineage of a cancer cell.  “Cancer is primarily a disturbance of cell growth and survival, and an aberrant growth pattern is perhaps the only property that is shared by all cancers. But because the initiation and much of the subsequent development of tumors occurs prior to diagnosis, studying the growth and spread of tumors seems to call for retrospective techniques, and these have been lacking until now,” says Shapiro.
 
Adam Wasserstrom
 

 

Their research, which was featured on the cover of Cancer Research, was based on tumor cells extracted from a mouse lymphoma. The team’s findings showed that the cancer lineage had nearly twice as many branched generations as neighboring lung cells – that is, the rate of cancer cell division was almost double. They were also able to calculate the age of the tumor and characterize its growth pattern. More importantly, their analysis lent strong support to the hypothesis that cancer starts with mutations in a single cell of a mature organism.
 
Shapiro and his team intend to apply the method to answering some key questions in human cancers. They suspect, for instance, that the depth of the cancer cell lineage and other characteristics of the family tree may serve as prognostic markers, indicating the severity of the disease. They also plan to investigate whether chemotherapy targets cells with a specific lineage profile. Creating detailed family trees for different cancers may enable researchers to refine diagnostic tools and therapies and, eventually, to get right back to the roots of cancer.   
 
                                                                                             
 
 
Prof. Ehud Shapiro’s research is supported by the Clore Center for Biological Physics; the Arie and Ida Crown Memorial Charitable Fund; the Cymerman – Jakubskind Prize; the Phyllis and Joseph Gurwin Fund for Scientific Advancement; the Henry Gutwirth Fund for Research; Sally Leafman Appelbaum, Scottsdale, AZ; the Carolito Stiftung, Switzerland; the Louis Chor Memorial Trust Fund; and the estate of Fannie Sherr, New York, NY. Prof. Shapiro is the incumbent of the Harry Weinrebe Chair of Computer Science and Biology.
 
 
 

Lineage on Display


This research was the subject of an exhibit and interactive video presentation at the American Museum of Natural History in New York over the summer. Three other museums associated with the Museum of Natural History also mounted the exhibit: the McClung Museum in Knoxville, the Great Lakes Science Center in Cleveland and Science World in Vancouver. Lineage on Display

More information on the Weizmann Cell Lineage Project can be found at: www.weizmann.ac.il/lineage

The interactive feature can be found on the AMNH Science Bulletins website: http://www.amnh.org/sciencebulletins/?sid=h.s.evolutionary_tree.20080728&src=b
 
Prof. Ehud Shapiro.
Math & Computer Science
English

Running Interference

English

Dr. Eran Hornstein. RNA revolution

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Tiny RNA molecules have a big impact

RNA – regarded as a humble carrier of messages and fetcher of protein building information – has been living in DNA’s shadow for ages. The twinned spiral strands of DNA, which contain all the genetic information for making an organism, have come to represent the molecule of life, and the central dogma of biology has been that this genetic information is passed by rote transcription through DNA’s single-stranded cousin, RNA, to make proteins. Fifty years on, RNA has finally stepped into the limelight – revolutionizing ideas about how genes are regulated.
 
This so-called “RNA revolution” in molecular biology follows a series of recent discoveries of new types of RNA. These RNA molecules are not produced to be mere messengers; rather, the RNA molecules themselves are the end product, and they play a key role in the development of the organism. One such family of RNA molecules is the microRNAs (miRNA). Smaller than the well-known messenger RNA, these molecules help regulate the process by which genetic information is turned into proteins – gene expression. They do this by binding to messenger RNA molecules, preventing them from carrying out protein synthesis. RNA interference, as this process is called, provides the cell with a way of controlling the levels of hundreds of different proteins by turning genes off at the appropriate times.
 
Dr. Eran Hornstein of the Weizmann Institute’s Molecular Genetics Department and his team investigate how miRNAs help to regulate the various kinds of gene expression that lead to normal development as well as to disease. “We know that when some protein-coding genes acquire mutations, the result is disease. What we don’t know is what happens when miRNAs acquire mutations. Could faulty miRNAs also result in disease? Would their different mechanism of action imply a different set of diseases? If miRNAs are indeed involved in the emergence of genetic diseases, then new cures could be developed that target these miRNA genes,” says Hornstein.
 
Hornstein’s research specifically focuses on the role of miRNAs in the development of the pancreas, bone and cartilage, and how malfunctions in their genetic programs may contribute to such common diseases in these organs as diabetes mellitus, cleft palate and osteoporosis. “Cancer, too, begins when genetic programs go awry, so studies of the faulty regulation of miRNAs might provide new insights into the role of small RNAs in this devastating disease,” he says.
 
The team employs various types of research tools to identify the different miRNAs as well as their effects. The lab mainly uses  mouse models in which they are able to “knock out” a whole miRNA pathway or specific miRNA genes. These perturbations in a live context enable the scientists to deduce the miRNAs’ role in normal development.
 
So far, the group has discovered that if miRNAs are inactivated in pancreatic beta cells – the cells that secrete the hormone insulin, which regulates blood glucose levels – the mice exhibit hallmarks of diabetes mellitus. Hornstein’s team is now characterizing the molecular mechanisms by which miRNAs regulate the balance of glucose and insulin in the body.
 
Another avenue of research undertaken by the lab is uncovering the contribution of miRNAs to the development of skeletal tissues. Genetically removing miRNAs from skeletal tissues, for example, results in such striking deformities as complete loss of the skull, dwarfism and cleft palate. The team is now deciphering which genetic pathways go wrong in each instance and the specific miRNAs involved.
 
Hornstein: “Scientists are only now beginning to understand the true impact of miRNAs, both in the normal development of an organism and in disease. This newfound knowledge may one day lead to the development of new therapeutics that could target previously unknown mechanisms.” Indeed, scientists have already created synthetic versions of miRNAs that are both important research tools for biologists and possible new therapies for a number of diseases. Further research will no doubt revolutionize the way doctors treat certain diseases in the future.  
 

A Focus on Research

 
Dr. Eran Hornstein was born in Jerusalem in 1971. After a five-year army service, Hornstein attended the Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Medicine in Jerusalem. “I initially went to med school with the aim of becoming a physician. But I was also interested in science, so I decided to conduct basic research in parallel, in the lab of Prof. Oded Meyuhas of the Hebrew University’s Biochemistry Department.” Although medical training was exciting, Hornstein felt more attracted to basic research and thus, after completing his internship, he went on to postdoctoral studies with Prof. Cliff Tabin at Harvard Medical School, focusing on developmental biology.
 
“I feel that my medical training influences my world of associations and my inclination to study the basic molecular genetic mechanisms underlying disease states – especially as it ultimately has a significant impact on humans.”
 
Hornstein joined the Weizmann Institute as a senior scientist in 2006 and works with a team of seven students and three postdocs.
 

chicken embryo expressing microRNA on one side

Blue reporter gene in embryonic neural crest

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dr. Eran Hornstein’s research is supported by the Nella and Leon Benoziyo Center for Neurological Diseases; the Kekst Family Center for Medical Genetics; and the Kirk Center for Childhood Cancer and Immunological Disorders. Dr. Hornstein is the incumbent of the Helen and Milton A. Kimmelman Career Development Chair.

 

 

 
 
Blue reporter gene in embryonic neural crest
Life Sciences
English

Pages