Meeting Places

English

 

 

 

 

Our behavior is a product not just of who we are, but of where we are and who we’re with. That goes also for a protein called BID that plays a central role in our cells’ life cycles. Institute scientists studying this protein are finding that it can split its activities between two different sites in the cell, and its different actions in each can literally be a matter of life or death. Their findings may be important for understanding a number of disorders, from a rare genetic disease to such metabolic syndromes as obesity and diabetes.
The two faces of BID. When duty calls, it leaves the cell nucleus to initiate cell suicide. Illustration: Elite Avni
 
When Prof. Atan Gross and his research team in the Biological Regulation Department began investigating BID in lab dishes, they discovered that BID steers a cell that is in trouble – from damaged DNA, for instance – toward either altruistic suicide or survival. The critical factor was the connection to a second protein called ATM – a sort of “boss” molecule that oversees the actions of BID and a number of other proteins. The team discovered that when ATM interacts with BID, the cell stays alive. When ATM refrains from this interaction, BID attaches to proteins on the surface of organelles called mitochondria – the cell’s power plants – to initiate the series of events leading to cell death.

In research that appeared recently in Nature Cell Biology, Gross and his team set out to get a better picture of BID activity. Together with research students Maria Maryanovich and Galia Oberkovitz, and postdoctoral fellow Dr. Hagit Niv, he created and characterized mice in which the BID protein was mutated: It was unable to accept orders from ATM. After damaging the mice’s DNA, the team watched to see what would happen.

In studies led by Maryanovich, they found that BID is a regular multi-tasker. On the one hand, it does, as they had seen in the lab dishes, administer the cell’s decision to either commit suicide or keep things on hold while repairs are carried out. Unsurprisingly, the team found that cells with the mutated BID had a high suicide rate, especially in the bone marrow, which is highly sensitive to DNA damage. On the other hand, in a seemingly unrelated act, BID also directs the conversion of stem cells that reside in the bone marrow into functional blood cells. These blood stem cells, a kind of adult stem cell, are used to replace all types of blood cells over an organism’s lifetime, and their differentiation is a tightly controlled process. But when BID couldn’t communicate with ATM, the mice’s blood stem cells differentiated without restraint, soon depleting the supply.
 
 
To understand how BID does two jobs at once – directing both suicide and stem cell differentiation – the scientists had to find out where it was going and which proteins it was hooking up with. The cell nucleus, for instance, was where they found the meetings with ATM taking place. The experiments suggested that ATM brings along a physical restraining order telling the BID protein to stay where it is. Without ATM's restraining stamp, BID is free to wander off to its alternate site – the mitochondria – where it meets its other contact on the mitochondria’s outer surface. This is where things start to happen: The interaction spurs the creation of reactive oxygen species – the cells’ all-purpose stress molecules. The reactive oxygen species are like buckshot, tearing holes in the mitochondrion wall to release cell-killing toxins. But these molecules also work as SOS signals to the stem cells, calling on them to differentiate in a hurry.
Prof. Atan Gross
 
The scientists think that the ATM-BID partnership is a sort of control mechanism that senses the amount of DNA damage in a cell and adjusts reactive oxygen species levels accordingly. The findings, says Gross, are surprising – not just for the new function they have revealed for BID. They have yielded interesting insights into previously unsuspected connections between the mitochondria and the cell nucleus, as well as revealing tight coordination between two parts of the cellular life cycle – cell suicide and adult cell replenishment.

Gross and his team believe that these findings and insights may, in the future, have biomedical relevance. ATM mutations in humans cause a rare but devastating degenerative disease that appears in childhood and affects all parts of the body. Many of the worst effects seem to be tied to excess reactive oxygen species, and Gross thinks that finding ways to block BID could relieve symptoms and extend life. But there may be much broader applications: Recent research hints that the behavior of BID and the other proteins it interacts with may be linked to such metabolic syndromes as obesity and diabetes, as well as autoimmune diseases and even cancer. So it might be helpful to find ways of directing BID proteins to the right place and the proper meetings, at the right time.

Also participating in this research were Dr. Yehudit Zaltsman and Lidiya Vorobiyov of the Biological Regulation Department, Profs. Steffen Jung and Tsvee Lapidot of the Immunology Department, and Drs. Rebecca Haffner and Ori Brenner of the Veterinary Resources Department.
 
Prof. Atan Gross’s research is supported by the Jeanne and Joseph Nissim Foundation for Life Sciences Research; the Pearl Welinsky Merlo Foundation; the Helen and Martin Kimmel Institute for Stem Cell Research; the Clore Center for Biological Physics; the Yeda-Sela Center for Basic Research; and the Dr. Josef Cohn Minerva Center for Biomembrane Research.
 
 
 
 

 
 
The two faces of BID. When duty calls, it leaves the cell nucleus to initiate cell suicide. Illustration: Elite Avni
Life Sciences
English

Doubly Prepared

English

 

Naama Barkai
Prof. Naama Barkai

Sugar, cholesterol, phosphates, zinc – a healthy body is amazingly good at keeping such vital nutrients at appropriate levels within its cells. From an engineering point of view, one all-purpose model of the pumps on the surface of a cell should suffice to keep these levels constant: When the concentration of a nutrient – say, sugar – drops inside the cell, the pump mechanism could simply go into higher gear until the sugar level was back to normal. Yet, strangely enough, many cells are known to use two types of pump: One is active in “good times,” when a particular nutrient is abundant in the cell’s environment; the other is a “bad-times” pump that springs into action only when the nutrient becomes scarce. Why does the cell need this dual mechanism?

A new Weizmann Institute study, reported in Science, might provide the answer. The research was conducted by Dr. Sagi Levy, Moshe Kafri and Miri Carmi in the lab of Prof. Naama Barkai of the Molecular Genetics Department.

In their new study, the scientists discovered that cells which repress their “bad-times” pumps when a nutrient is abundant were much more efficient at preparing for starvation and at recovering afterwards than the cells that had been genetically engineered to avoid this repression. Apparently, the “good-times” pumps serve as a signaling mechanism that warns the yeast cell of approaching starvation, giving the cell more time to stock up on the scarce nutrient and helping the cell to start growing faster once starvation is over.

Wild type yeast cells (l) exhibit changes in the membrane pump proteins under different nutrient conditions, while yeast engineered to avoid repressing one transporter type (r) show no change
 

Thus the dual-pump system appears to be part of a regulatory mechanism that enables the cell to deal effectively with fluctuations in nutrient supply. If these findings prove to be applicable to human cells, they could explain how our bodies maintain adequate levels of various nutrients in tissues and organs. Understanding dual-pump regulation could be crucial because mishaps in the process might contribute to various metabolic disorders.

Prof. Naama Barkai's research is supported by the Helen and Martin Kimmel Award for Innovative Investigation; the Jeanne and Joseph Nissim Foundation for Life Sciences Research; the Carolito Stiftung; Lorna Greenberg Scherzer, Canada; the estate of John Hunter; the Minna James Heineman Stiftung; the European Research Council; and the estate of Hilda Jacoby-Schaerf. Prof. Barkai is the incumbent of the Lorna Greenberg Scherzer Professorial Chair.

 

 
Wild type yeast cells (l) exhibit changes in the membrane pump proteins under different nutrient conditions, while yeast engineered to avoid repressing one transporter type (r) show no change
Life Sciences
English

Weizmann Institute Scientists Discover How Cells Brace for Starvation

English
Sugar, cholesterol, phosphates, zinc – a healthy body is amazingly good at keeping such vital nutrients at appropriate levels within its cells. From an engineering point of view, one all-purpose model of pump on the surface of a cell should suffice to keep these levels constant: When the concentration of a nutrient, say, sugar, drops inside the cell, the pump mechanism could simply go into higher gear until the sugar levels are back to normal. Yet strangely enough, such cells let in their nutrients using two types of pump: One is active in “good times,” when a particular nutrient is abundant the cell’s environment; the other is a “bad-times” pump that springs into action only when the nutrient becomes scarce. Why does the cell need this dual mechanism?

A new Weizmann Institute study, reported in Science, might provide the answer. The research was conducted in the lab of Prof. Naama Barkai of the Molecular Genetics Department by postdoctoral fellow Dr. Sagi Levy and graduate student Moshe Kafri with lab technician Miri Carmi.  

It had been known for a while that when the levels of phosphate or zinc drop in the surroundings of a yeast cell, the number of “bad-times” pumps on the cell surface soars up to a hundred-fold. When phosphate or zinc becomes abundant again, the “bad-times” pumps withdraw while the “good-times” pumps return to the cell surface in large numbers.
In their new study, the scientists discovered that cells which repress their “bad-time” pumps when a nutrient is abundant were much more efficient at preparing for starvation and at recovering afterwards than the cells that had been genetically engineered to avoid this repression. The conclusion: The “good-times” pumps apparently serve as a signaling mechanism that warns the yeast cell of approaching starvation. Such advance warning gives the cell more time to store up on the scarce nutrient; the thorough preparation also helps the cell to start growing faster once starvation is over.

Thus, the dual-pump system appears to be part of a regulatory mechanism that allows the cell to deal effectively with fluctuations in nutrient supply. This clever mechanism offers the cell survival advantages that could not be provided by just one type of pump.  

If these findings prove to be applicable to human cells, they could explain how our bodies maintain adequate levels of various nutrients in tissues and organs. Understanding the dual-pump regulation could be crucial because it might be defective in various metabolic disorders.
 

Prof. Naama Barkai’s research is supported by the Helen and Martin Kimmel Award for Innovative Investigation; the Jeanne and Joseph Nissim Foundation for Life Sciences Research; the Carolito Stiftung; Lorna Greenberg Scherzer, Canada; the estate of John Hunter; the Minna James Heineman Stiftung; the European Research Council; and the estate of Hilda Jacoby-Schaerf. Prof. Barkai is the incumbent of the Lorna Greenberg Scherzer Professorial Chair.

 


 
Life Sciences
English

Hidden Passage

English
Electron microscope image of an effector cell inserting several appendages through endothelial cell membranes
 
The white blood cells that fight disease and help the body heal are directed to sites of infection or injury by “exit signs” – chemical signals that tell them where to pass through the blood vessel walls and into the underlying tissue. Such signs consist of migration-promoting molecules called chemokines, which the cells lining the blood vessels display on their outer surfaces like flashing lights.
 
In previous research, Prof. Ronen Alon and his team in the Immunology Department had shown that white blood cells crawl on dozens of tiny legs along the endothelial cells on the inner surface of blood vessels, feeling their way to the chemokines. But in new research, which appeared in Nature Immunology, Alon, together with Drs. Ziv Shulman and Shmuel Cohen, found that sometimes those chemokines are stashed away in tiny containers – vesicles – just inside the inflamed endothelial cells.
 
 
In this case, only certain immune cells, called effector cells, are able to find the chemokines and thus exit the blood vessels. Effector cells are “educated”: They learn to identify particular pathogens in the lymph nodes before returning to the bloodstream to seek them out. Alon and his team observed that as effector cells sought out hidden chemokines near inflammation sites, they paused in the joins where several endothelial cells meet and extended their legs right through the endothelial cell membranes. Once they obtained the right chemokine directives, the effector cells were quickly ushered out through the blood vessel walls toward their final destination.
 
 

Effector cells, tagged green, seem to fade as they detect chemokines and move inward, past the surface of the blood vessel endothelium

 

 

 

Effector cells in an experimental control move on endothelium that does not produce internal chemokines

 

Prof. Ronen Alon
 
The researchers think that this game of “hide and seek” both preserves the chemokine signal and acts as a “selector” that permits only “trained” effector cells to exit the bloodstream. Alon: “We think that tumors near blood vessels might exploit these traffic rules by putting the endothelial cells in a quiescent state or making the endothelium produce the ‘wrong’ chemokines. Immune cells capable of destroying these tumors would then be unable to reach the tumor site, whereas those that aid in cancer growth will easily pass through to them.”
 
Prof. Ronen Alon’s research is supported by the Helen and Martin Kimmel Institute for Stem Cell Research; and the Kirk Center for Childhood Cancer and Immunological Disorders. Prof. Alon is the incumbent of the Linda Jacobs Professorial Chair in Immune and Stem Cell Research.
 
Electron microscope image of an effector cell inserting several appendages through endothelial cell membranes
Life Sciences
English

The X Factor of Ovulation

English
 
An essential prelude to the journey of life is the egg's ripening in the mother’s ovary, culminating with its release at ovulation. Understanding the details of this process is crucial both for developing future fertility treatments and for designing better contraceptives. A major molecular mystery concerning this early step – one that had baffled scientists for more than seven decades – has recently been conclusively solved.

It is now well known that a woman ovulates – that is, an egg matures and is released from its ovarian follicle – under the influence of a hormone called LH, which is secreted by the pituitary gland in the brain. But in 1935, the famous American biologist Prof. Gregory Pincus, later to become one of the fathers of the pill, working with Dr. E. V. Enzmann, discovered a remarkable paradox: Eggs removed from the follicle mature spontaneously in a test tube, without any need for hormonal stimulation. How is this possible?
 
Mature oocyte, ready for fertilization; surrounding the oocyte are follicle cells
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The series of studies that were ultimately to resolve this riddle began at the Weizmann Institute of Science in the early 1970s. Intrigued by the Pincus-Enzmann paradox, Prof. Alex Tsafriri of the Biological Regulation Department, then a doctoral student, created the first system for culturing the large ovarian follicles of rats in a laboratory dish. This model proved useful for future studies of egg maturation in all mammals, including humans. It was thus possible to reveal the exact role of the ovulation hormone, LH. This was the first indication that a crucial molecular messenger called cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) plays a role in egg maturation.

This role was elucidated through the studies of several groups over many years, with crucial contributions by Prof. Nava Dekel of the Weizmann Institute. In a nutshell, it turned out that LH triggers ovulation through a rise in follicle cAMP production. Yet in the egg, cAMP produces the opposite effect: A steady cAMP presence blocks egg maturation, which begins to proceed only when the level drops.

As a postdoctoral fellow in the United States, Tsafriri, together with Prof. Cornelia Channing of the University of Maryland in Baltimore, showed that not only the follicle cells but even the fluid filling the follicles prevented the spontaneous maturation of mammalian eggs in the test tube. The scientists postulated that a mysterious “X factor” blocked egg maturation in the follicle. Tsafriri and his colleagues purified it partially and stipulated that it was a small peptide, giving it the general name OMI, for “oocyte maturation inhibitor.”
 
 
Prof. Alex Tsafriri
 
Tsafriri continued to study egg maturation upon returning to Israel and joining the Weizmann Institute faculty. In research spanning a decade, roughly between 1975 and 1985, Tsafriri and his colleagues from Baltimore, Profs. Channing and Seymour Pomerantz, came close to solving the Pincus-Enzmann paradox. As predicted earlier, OMI turned out to be a small peptide produced by follicle cells. Most importantly, by growing rat eggs and follicle cells together in test tubes, the scientists clarified how egg maturation is controlled: They suggested that follicle cells continually release OMI, blocking egg maturation, while LH overcomes this blockage. This explanation resolved the paradox in general terms: When the egg is placed in a laboratory dish, it matures without the hormone simply because OMI is no longer there to prevent it from doing so.

During a sabbatical at Stanford University, in collaboration with Prof. Marco Conti, Tsafriri identified the final link in this chain of events, the ultimate molecular switch that keeps egg maturation in check. This switch, an enzyme called PDE3A that degrades cAMP, is present in the egg itself.  The scientists showed that as long as PDE3A remains in the OFF position, the egg does not mature, although other ovulation-related changes in the ovary can proceed undisturbed. These findings suggest that it might be possible to develop a method for blocking PDE3A as an optimal approach to contraception.

With time, it became clear that blocking egg maturation is a multi-step process. Why is such a complex molecular sequence needed to regulate egg maturation?  “The sequence ensures that this process is carefully controlled, so that eggs don’t start maturing spontaneously by mistake,” says Tsafriri. “Egg maturation is so critical to life, it needs to be regulated with utmost precision, in concert with the changes that prepare the womb to be receptive to the embryo at the proper time.”


X-factor identified


As for OMI, the molecular “X factor,” it was finally identified recently by Prof. John Eppig and his group at the Jackson Laboratory in Bar Harbor, Maine, as reported in Science. Indeed, it’s a peptide, of the same size that Tsafriri and colleagues had predicted, called natriuretic peptide C (NPC); and indeed, it is continuously released by the follicle cells. A shutdown in NPC production unleashes the complex cascade of molecular events in the follicle cells that results in the activation of PDE3A (the ON position) in the egg, degradation of cAMP there, and eventually, egg maturation. “The discovery of this molecule and its action in the follicle has provided the ultimate proof for the OMI concept we formulated more than thirty years ago,” says Tsafriri.

 

The Bahat Prize


Prof. Alex Tsafriri was awarded the Bahat Prize given annually by the University of Haifa Press “for quality, original, non-fiction manuscripts in Hebrew that have not been published previously and which have a potentially large popular audience.” Tsafriri was awarded the prize for his work “Man as Animal?” (Ha-Adam K-Haya?), which provides a scientist’s perspective on the debates held in Israel and abroad over animal experimentation in biomedical research. Tsafriri discusses the moral and philosophical aspects of such experimentation, outlining how people-animal relations are treated by the different monotheistic religions, with an emphasis on Jewish theology. The manuscript will be co-published by the University of Haifa Press and Yedioth Books.
 
 
Mature oocyte, ready for fertilization; surrounding the oocyte are follicle cells
Life Sciences
English

Touching Ground

English

 

Non-polarized cell six hours after seeding onto a compliant fibronectin-coated substrate. Yellow shows paxillin, a protein associated with focal adhesions
 
 
 
Adhesion, as they say, is a sticky business, especially for a cell. The adhesion complexes linking a cell’s outer surface to neighboring cells and connective tissues consist of hundreds of different proteins. These not only hold the cell in place but also sense the properties of the cell’s surroundings and relay that information to the inside of the cell. So crucial is the adhesion-mediated process, according to new Institute research, that even cells that actively migrate must first “stick around” in order to get into traveling shape.
 
Profs. Benjamin Geiger and Alexander Bershadsky of the Molecular Cell Biology Department are interested in the ways that cells sense and respond to the physical properties of their environment. Blood pressure, muscle tension, and tissue stiffness and tension are all features and forces that act on cells, affecting their behavior and fate. Included in these is the capacity of cells to generate contractile forces of their own. When a cell contacts a surface, for example, it first attaches weakly and then contracts so as to probe the surface with the force of its pull. If this test indicates that the surface is adhesive and displays the proper mechanical properties (i.e., rigidity), it adheres, extending its adhesion complexes into so-called focal adhesions and spreading itself out. To begin revealing the intricate relationship between an adhering cell and its substrate, Geiger and Bershadsky, together with postdoctoral fellows Drs. Masha Prager-Khoutorsky and Alexandra Lichtenstein, designed and constructed an experimental system in which cells were placed on adhesive polymer surfaces that had similar chemical properties and differed only in their stiffness. Their findings were published in Nature Cell Biology.
Prof. Alexander Bershadsky
 
They found that the differences in the cells’ behavior were immediately apparent: The cells on the softer surfaces spread out equally in all directions, forming tiny, circular “fried egg” configurations, whereas those on the stiffer surface became elongated. Elongation gives cells polarity – a “head” and “tail.”  This pear shape enables the cells to take off and migrate, an essential property for embryonic development, wound healing, and tissue growth and repair. A closer look revealed differences in the focal adhesions. The round cells on the softer surface had adhesions that were small and evenly distributed all around or throughout.  By contrast, on the rigid surfaces, the focal adhesions were large, and these tended to align with the future head and tail regions of the cell even before elongation was observed. In other words, whether a cell is sleek and travel-worthy or comfortably round is directly connected to the rigidity of the substrate it adheres to. Focal adhesions, among other things, function as the rigidity sensors. 
 
 
To understand the focal adhesion process on the molecular level, the researchers, using gene silencing technology, systematically depleted various genes that encode specific signaling cellular proteins – some 80 different genes in all – and they tested how each modified cell responded to its surface. The Institute’s Prof. Zvi Kam provided essential help with microscopy, automatic image analysis and quantification, and Dr. Ramaswamy Krishnan of Harvard University assisted with a method for measuring the forces applied by the cells to the underlying substrate.
Prof. Benjamin Geiger
 
Some of the cells with silenced genes lost their ability to polarize or to form different sizes of focal adhesions in response to the substrate rigidity; in others, the cells’ grip on the surface or the detection of force was affected. The researchers concluded that cell polarization is a highly complex process – one that is driven by mechanical force and mediated by focal adhesions. Regulation of this process occurs in multiple stages, affecting the generation of cellular forces as well as directing the response to force. “We were surprised at how many regulatory factors are involved,” says Bershadsky. Geiger: “We have revealed a strong tie between the development of focal adhesions, the generation of force and cell migration, and have identified some of the critical regulators of this process.”

Their findings may have relevance for many areas of biology and basic biomedical research. For instance, the scientists believe the insights they have gained may be relevant to processes affecting the cells lining the blood vessels. These cells are often exposed to turbulent blood flow or regular pressure changes, which can contribute to arterial plaque formation and aberrant collateral blood vessel development. Understanding the process may help to identify potential therapeutic targets for such disorders.
 
Prof. Alexander Bershadsky's research is supported by the Kahn Family Research Center for Systems Biology of the Human Cell. Prof. Bershadsky is the incumbent of the Joseph Moss Professorial Chair of Biomedical Research.

Prof. Benjamin Geiger's research is supported by the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust; and IIMI, Inc. Prof Geiger is the incumbent of the Professor Erwin Neter Professorial Chair of Cell and Tumor Biology.


 
 


 

 
 
 
 
Non-polarized cell six hours after seeding onto a compliant fibronectin-coated substrate. Yellow shows paxillin, a protein associated with focal adhesions
Life Sciences
English

One Protein, Two Programs

English

 

Cells growing under normal (l) and starvation (c and r) conditions. The green spots indicate an autophagy protein that is normally diffused in the cytoplasm, but is recruited to form autophagosomes in response to stress

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
One of the most important decisions a cell has to make is whether to live or die. Every single cell in our bodies is armed with genetic “programs” that instruct it to commit suicide when necessary. Cell suicide, however, is not as dire as it sounds: It actually helps prevent cancerous or infected cells from spreading. The self-destruct program also plays an important role in embryonic development: The formation of separate fingers and toes in a developing embryo, for example, relies on the death of cells between the nascent digits.

The main program for cell suicide is apoptosis – a process in which cells shrink in size and break into smaller pieces that then get consumed by neighboring cells. Alternately, a cell can undergo autophagy – a “self-eating” process in which the cell engulfs and degrades its own proteins and organelles. Autophagy, however, is a somewhat double-edged sword: It enables cells to survive stress by breaking down unnecessary or harmful components; but if the self-eating becomes excessive, autophagy can lead to cell death.
 
For quite some time it has been known that the mechanisms of apoptosis and autophagy engage in a complex exchange of information, but scientists have been struggling to identify the proteins that link the two. Prof. Adi Kimchi and Ph.D. student Assaf Rubinstein of the Weizmann Institute's Molecular Genetics Department reckoned that there might be special “dual-action” proteins that are able to control both processes, thus allowing for direct, efficient communication between the two cell death programs.
 
Assaf Rubinstein and Prof. Adi Kimchi. Dual action
 

 

What they didn’t expect to discover, however, was that one of these “crosstalk” proteins is actually an essential autophagy protein, called Atg12. In addition to its previously known function in autophagy, the scientists found – through various screening and gene knockdown procedures – that Atg12 also has a drastic effect on the activation of apoptosis. Without Atg12, the apoptotic responses of cells were significantly attenuated. "This was quite surprising as, until now, this protein has only been known to function in autophagy," says Rubinstein. But finding the influential protein was the relatively easy part; the harder task was to understand how Atg12 is able to control apoptosis.

With the help of Miriam Eisenstein of the Chemical Research Support Department, Kimchi and Rubinstein identified a region in the Atg12 protein that is similar to one seen in apoptotic proteins. This region promotes apoptosis by binding to and inhibiting a family of anti-apoptotic proteins called Bcl-2. Could the region on the autophagy protein function in the same way? By employing a special technique to identify protein binding partners, the scientists discovered, as they reported in Molecular Cell, that Atg12 is, indeed, able to partner with Bcl-2 and its extended family members, and the end result is apoptosis. They also found that the role Atg12 plays in apoptosis is independent of its role in autophagy: Disrupting its apoptotic function did not impair autophagy and, conversely, disrupting the autophagic pathway did not impair its apoptotic function.

This research may, among other things, have implications for cancer treatment. In many cases, cancer cells shut down the apoptotic process by elevating levels of Bcl-2, in effect enabling the cancer to grow unhindered. Because initial results of the study suggest that Atg12 binds Bcl-2 using a unique mechanism – different from that of other apoptotic proteins – Atg12 might be considered as a possible basis for anti-cancer drugs that target Bcl-2.

The next question the scientists will endeavor to answer is: Why does the cell use the same protein to carry out two different tasks? "We speculate that in certain situations in which a cell is under stress, it first induces autophagy to try and save itself. If this fails, however, it switches to apoptosis to sacrifice itself for the sake of the organism. By employing the same protein, there would be a direct connection between autophagy and apoptosis, making the process much quicker and more efficient," says Rubinstein.
 
Prof. Adi Kimchi’s research is supported by the Helen and Martin Kimmel Institute for Stem Cell Research. Prof. Kimchi is the incumbent of the Helena Rubinstein Professorial Chair in Cancer Research.
 
 
Cells growing under normal (l) and starvation (c and r) conditions. The green spots indicate an autophagy protein that is normally diffused in the cytoplasm, but is recruited to form autophagosomes in response to stress
Life Sciences
English

Unraveling Batten Disease

English
 
 
Normal (l) and Batten disease (r) model cells. Red and green fluorescent protein markers that do not co-localize in normal cells overlap in the disease cell images, indicating mis-trafficking of the green organelle marker
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Waste management is a big issue anywhere, but at the cellular level it can be a matter of life and death. A Weizmann Institute study, published in the Journal of Cell Biology, has revealed what causes a molecular waste container in the cell to overflow in Batten disease, a rare but fatal neurodegenerative disorder that begins in childhood. The findings may form the basis for a therapy for this disorder.

In Batten disease, an insoluble yellow pigment accumulates in the brain’s neurons, causing these cells to degenerate and ultimately die. Patients gradually become disabled, losing their vision and motor skills and suffering mental impairment; they rarely survive beyond their early twenties. It’s been known for a while that the disorder is caused by a mutation in the gene referred to as CLN3, but the role of this gene in the cell was unknown. This role has now been discovered in the Weizmann Institute study, explaining the molecular dysfunction in Batten disease.
 
 
Prof. Jeffrey Gerst and Rachel Kama
 
The research was conducted in the laboratory of Prof. Jeffrey Gerst of the Molecular Genetics Department by Rachel Kama and postdoctoral fellow Dr. Vydehi Kanneganti, in collaboration with Prof. Christian Ungermann of the University of Osnabrueck in Germany. All the studies were performed in yeast: The yeast equivalent of the mammalian CLN3 gene has been conserved almost intact in the course of evolution, making them an ideal model for study. In fact, so similar are the yeast and the mammalian genes that when the researchers replaced a missing copy of the yeast gene with a working copy of mammalian CLN3, normal functioning of the yeast cell was restored.

The experiments showed that the yeast equivalent of CLN3 is involved in moving proteins around in the cell – the scientific term is “protein trafficking.” The gene activates an enzyme of the kinase family, which, in turn, launches a series of molecular events regulating the trafficking. When the yeast CLN3 is mutated, this trafficking is disrupted. As a result, certain proteins accumulate abnormally in the lysosome, the cell’s waste-recycling machine, instead of being transported to another destination. At some point the lysosome is filled beyond capacity; it then interferes with molecular signaling and other vital processes in the neuron, eventually killing the cell.

A great deal of research must still be performed before this finding can benefit humans, but the clarification of the CLN3 function is precisely what might help develop a new therapy. Replacing the defective CLN3 in all the brain’s neurons would be a daunting challenge; but replacing its function – for example, by activating the relevant kinase by means of a drug – should be much more feasible.  
 
Prof. Jeffrey Gerst’s research is supported by the Miles and Kelly Nadal and Family Laboratory for Research in Molecular Genetics; the Hugo and Valerie Ramniceanu Foundation; the Y. Leon Benoziyo Institute for Molecular Medicine; the Yeda-Sela Center for Basic Research; the estate of Raymond Lapon; the National Contest for Life (NCL) Stiftung, Germany; and the Israel Science Foundation, Israel. Prof. Gerst is the incumbent of the Besen-Brender Professorial Chair of Microbiology and Parasitology.
 
 
Prof. Jeffrey Gerst and Rachel Kama
Life Sciences
English

Stem Cell Phone Home

English
 
 
In the medicine of the future, stem cells promise to regenerate organs in the diseased body. They might, for example, help repair a malfunctioning heart muscle or replace the brain cells lost to stroke or Parkinson’s disease. But to turn this vision into reality, simply injecting stem cells into the damaged body organ is not enough. The cells must be introduced in a manner that allows them to survive and to function properly, so that they can lead to a cure.
Dr. Lilach Gilboa. Precise coordination
 

 

 
Crucial for stem cell function is a supporting environment called “the niche,” which is attached to the stem cell and serves as its home base. The niche protects the stem cell and controls its development, ensuring that it differentiates into a specialized cell type only when the time is right. In fact, the stem cell and its niche function together, as a single unit. In a new study published in the journal PLoS Biology, Weizmann Institute scientists have shown how such units are formed in larvae of fruit flies. The research was performed in the laboratory of Dr. Lilach Gilboa of the  Biological Regulation Department by postdoctoral fellow Dr. Dana Gancz and graduate student Tamar Lengil.
 
 
In the developing embryo, the establishment of germ-line stem cells – which will continually give rise to eggs in the adult female – must be coordinated with the production of the niches, so that each stem cell has a niche. But how and when does such coordination occur?
 
Working with the ovaries of fruit fly larvae, the Weizmann scientists have discovered an ingenious method nature uses to produce well-balanced stem cell units: The formation of both the stem cells and the niches is controlled by the same biochemical signal. The scientists have also shown that the signal travels along a similar route to the one that controls ovulation in humans: from the brain to a hormone-secreting gland to the ovaries.
 
The development of the ovary in a fruit fly larva: the niches (blue) are in contact with germ-line stem cells (green); further away from the niches, germ-line stem cells begin their differentiation into eggs (purple)
 
The use of the same hormonal signal helps ensure that the entire process is perfectly orchestrated and timed. The ovary of the fruit fly larva starts out with precursor cells for both niches and germ-line stem cells.
 
The two populations of precursor cells multiply until the larval gland issues the hormonal signal that stimulates the formation of the niches in the ovaries. Next, when a second wave of the hormone is dispatched to the ovary, germ-line stem cells form from their precursors. In other words, the same signal first creates a “home” for the germ-line stem cell, then the “tenant” cell itself.
 

 

 
In fact, it is crucial that the niches be formed before the stem cells. The niches make sure these cells are properly maintained, so that the fruit fly – which has close to 20 niche-stem cell units in its ovary – can daily produce dozens of eggs for over a month.

These findings provide important new insights into the relations between stem cells and their niches. Further understanding of the molecular signals that govern the formation of stem cell units and of body organs may in the future facilitate the use of stem cells in organ regeneration.
 
The adult stem cell unit: Niches are in red. Cap cells (barbed arrowhead) are tightly associated with germ-line stem cells (outlined). Germ-line stem cells carry a spherical organelle - a fusome - which is asymmetrically localized to the side of the cap cells (arrow). Once the stem cell divides, one daughter cell loses contact with the niche and differentiates (green). The fusome in a differentiating germ cell becomes branched (arrowhead)
 
 
 
Dr. Lilach Gilboa’s research is supported by the Leir Charitable Foundations; the Karen Siem Fellowship for Women in Science; the Helen and Martin Kimmel Institute for Stem Cell Research; and the Willner Family Center for Vascular Biology. Dr. Gilboa is the incumbent of the Skirball Chair in New Scientists.
 
 
 
The adult stem cell unit: Niches are in red. Cap cells (barbed arrowhead) are tightly associated with germ-line stem cells (outlined). Germ-line stem cells carry a spherical organelle - a fusome - which is asymmetrically localized to the side of the cap cells (arrow). Once the stem cell divides, one daughter cell loses contact with the niche and differentiates (green). The fusome in a differentiating germ cell becomes branched (arrowhead)
Life Sciences
English

Built to Scale

English

 

The patterns on these butterfly wings are perfectly scaled, even though they are different sizes

 
 
The wing of a fly is a marvelous piece of work; its unique properties rely, in part, on an intricate network of structural veins. If we compare a small fly wing to a large one, exactly the same pattern of veins – scaled to fit – appears. How does this happen? For that matter, how do humans and animals grow limbs just the right size for their bodies? How do developing embryos keep everything in proportion as they grow?
 
Prof. Naama Barkai
 
These questions are ones of scaling – how patterns stay in sync with size as an embryo or organism grows and develops. Institute scientists Profs. Naama Barkai and Ben-Zion Shilo and research student Danny Ben-Zvi of the Molecular Genetics Department have now shown how scaling works in fruit fly wings, and their findings should be applicable to many different examples of development.

These researchers drew their inspiration from a famous experiment performed in the 1920s by German scientist Hans Spemann, in which he grafted cells from the future head of one frog embryo onto the flank of a second embryo. The resulting tadpole was a “Siamese twin” with two perfectly formed – but half-sized – heads. This finding implied that, rather than proceeding according to a pre-set “plan,” development takes place through cells sending messages to one another, directing them down certain developmental paths. In the intervening years, it has been found that the control mechanism for patterning relies on one such message – a substance called a morphogen. Morphogens are secreted by a small number of cells in the center of the developing embryo, and from there, they diffuse outward. As this substance disperses, its levels drop off in the cells farther from the center, and thus the morphogen concentration relays a signal to the developing cell about its place and function in the growing organism.
 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

Prof. Ben-Zion Shilo. Above: Prof. Naama Barkai
 
But the Institute researchers knew this was not the whole story: A morphogen diffuses from the center at the same rate in a small organism as in a larger one and thus would not effect scaling on its own. Several years ago, they recreated Spemann’s frog embryo experiment, but they looked for a second signal – one that could bring size into the picture. Indeed, they found a molecule that is synthesized at the edges – one that also diffuses away from its site of origin. The second molecule functions as a morphogen, and it is the redistribution of this molecule that finally determines the morphogen signal each developing cell receives, in a way that also takes embryo size into consideration.

Next, they asked: Do all complex organisms use a similar scaling method? To explore this question, Barkai and Ben-Zvi first created a theoretical model in which a molecule on the growing edge – called an expander molecule – aids in the distribution of the morphogen. The morphogen is referred to in the model as a repression molecule because it also shuts down the synthesis of the expander molecule at the edge. The model suggests just how this interplay between expansion created at the edge and repression moving from the center results in a pattern built to scale.
 
In the new study, which appeared in Current Biology, Ben-Zvi, Barkai and Shilo have brought the theoretical model back into the lab, carrying out experiments on the development of wings in fruit fly larvae. These larvae don’t actually have wings; nevertheless, wing patterning is already taking place in small structures called wing discs, and their development can easily be traced. The researchers knew that a morphogen called Dpp was active in the wing disks, and they suspected that a protein called “Pentagone,” acted as an expander molecule, as it had recently been shown to play a role in the development of wing vein networks.

The scientists collected fruit fly larvae of varying size and, using a quantitative method they developed, checked the distribution of morphogen concentrations. They then eliminated Pentagone from the developing wing and checked again. Their findings showed that the wings in the unaltered fruit flies revealed the morphogen scaling activity predicted in the model, its signals being proportionate to wing size. In contrast, in the flies without Pentagone the morphogen was distributed in the same way in all the wings, regardless of their relative sizes. They were thus able to show that Pentagone is, indeed, an expansion molecule and that the expansion-repression paradigm they had formulated can be applied to such differing organisms as frogs and fruit flies.

Shilo: “Frog embryos and fly wings in larvae develop through completely different molecular mechanisms, yet they apparently follow the same general scaling model. The beauty of this research lies in the way it seamlessly weaves a theoretical model into experimental biology. This gives us a fresh approach to investigating scaling, an approach in which, rather than getting bogged down in a search for complex molecular mechanisms, we can begin by looking for this relatively simple and universal paradigm.”
 
Prof. Naama Barkai’s research is supported by the Helen and Martin Kimmel Award for Innovative Investigation; the Jeanne and Joseph Nissim Foundation for Life Sciences Research; the Carolito Stiftung; Lorna Greenberg Scherzer, Canada; the Minna James Heineman Stiftung; and the European Research Council. Prof. Barkai is the incumbent of the Lorna Greenberg Scherzer Professorial Chair.

Prof. Ben-Zion Shilo’s research is supported by the Jeanne and Joseph Nissim Foundation for Life Sciences Research; the Dr. Josef Cohn Minerva Center for Biomembrane Research; the Carolito Stiftung; la Fondation Raphael et Regina Levy; the estate of Georg Galai; and the Mary Ralph Designated Philanthropic Fund. Prof. Shilo is the incumbent of the Hilda and Cecil Lewis Professorial Chair of Molecular Genetics.


 
 
The patterns on these butterfly wings are perfectly scaled, even though they are different sizes
Life Sciences
English

Pages