Second Generation

English

 

(l-r) Drs. Harry and BenjaminTowbin and Nora

“I just want to make it clear that I had nothing to do with my son’s decision to come here; that was completely his own choice,” says Dr. Harry Towbin. Towbin, recently retired from the Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich, completed his PhD at the Weizmann Institute close to 40 years ago. He and his wife, Marion, were recently at the Institute visiting their son, Dr. Benjamin Towbin, who is currently a postdoctoral fellow in the Institute’s Molecular Cell Biology Department.

After completing his MSc at ETH, Harry had decided to continue his studies in Israel – he felt the need for a “change of atmosphere.” He had previously been to the country as a tourist and to visit family in Tel Aviv. “This was in the days before Internet,” he says. “So I got on a plane and spent a few days staying with my relatives and looking around.”

In 1973, Harry ended up in the lab of Prof. David Elson in Weizmann’s Biological Chemistry Department, where he worked on the structure of the ribosome. A short time after he arrived, the Yom Kippur War broke out. Research in the lab ground to a halt as its members were called up, so Towbin and a friend went to volunteer on a kibbutz in the south of the country, helping out in the chicken coops. Soon enough, however, the lab work started up again.

Towbin found the relatively small, intimate size of the Institute and its research groups to his liking. When Marion, whom he had met in Switzerland, finished her studies in pharmacology, the two married and she joined him in Israel. Harry continued his research, and Marion found a position as a lab technician in the neurobiology lab of Prof. Zvi Vogel.

“We got to know the country quite well,” says Towbin, “especially the desert. We both like to hike, and we miss the desert when we are in Switzerland.”

When the Towbins returned to Switzerland, Harry took up a position at the Friedrich Miescher Institute (FMI) for Biomedical Research in Basel. There, he and his colleagues developed the technique for the Western blot tests used today in almost every biology lab in the world. “Some elements of the technique were inspired by the work done in David Elson’s lab,” he says. Harry then moved to the pharmaceutical company, Ciba-Geigy, which would later become Novartis. In his lab there, he continued conducting basic research in immunological chemistry. When the company downsized, just as he was turning 60, Towbin retired and accepted an invitation from ETH to join its faculty. Now he is there part time, mainly consulting and working with students, which he greatly enjoys. “As a scientist, you never completely break with your work,” he says.

Benjamin, the younger of Towbin’s sons, was also drawn to scientific research. (His older brother is an economist.) He completed his PhD in Basel, at FMI, but he already knew he wanted to conduct postdoctoral work outside the country. Both he and his wife, Christine, were familiar with Israel, making it a comfortable choice. But what truly attracted Benjamin was the research of Prof. Uri Alon of the Weizmann Institute’s Molecular Cell Biology Department. Benjamin had been following Alon’s work in the field of systems biology for a number of years. “I found it exciting,” he says. So when Alon spoke at a conference in Basel, Benjamin approached him and Alon ended up inviting him to the Weizmann Institute.

At the Institute, Alon arranged for Benjamin to meet with a number of research groups. “All of them were fascinating,” he says, “but I ended up in Uri’s group, as had been my initial plan.” Benjamin is an experimental “wet-lab” biologist; his PhD research in molecular biology focused on the spatial organization of the DNA in the nematode C. elegans. Now he is investigating regulatory gene networks in the bacterium E. coli. “This is my chance to learn something new,” he says. “The group is made up of experimentalists and theorists, and what I am learning from the theorists is helping me rethink my experiments.”

Benjamin, Christine and their 1 1/2-year-old daughter live in Rehovot, near the Institute. Christine is starting a postdoc in environmental sciences: She transferred from her research group in Switzerland to that of Dr. Itay Halevy in the Institute’s Earth and Planetary Sciences Department. After being here for six months they are happy with their choice, says Benjamin, not least because they have found Israel to be a very child-friendly place. They have been made to feel very welcome, he adds, having received valuable help both from members of the lab and from the Institute’s Visiting Scientists Department.

For Harry and Marion Towbin, having a child and grandchild in Israel gives them an excuse to visit more often. Such visits include meetings with Institute researchers who have been his colleagues for some 40 years, among them Profs. Moshe Oren and Zvi Vogel. And they still take the opportunity to hike in the desert – the day after being interviewed, the family was on their way south from Rehovot on a hiking trip through the Ramon craters.
 
 

 

(l-r) Drs. Harry and BenjaminTowbin and Nora
Life Sciences
English

Young Inside

English
 
 
Dr. Valery Krizhanovsky

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We can see the external signs of aging – wrinkles and gray hair – but its central processes are hidden from sight within tissues and organs. One of these processes, called cellular senescence, occurs when cells keep functioning but stop reproducing. A better understanding of this senescence may in the future help keep the body's tissues “forever young,” so as to prevent cancer or degeneration of organs or treat aging-related diseases.


What is the natural purpose of senescence in the body? What causes senescent cells to accumulate with age? Is it possible to prevent aging or at least remove senescent cells from the tissues? These are some of the questions investigated in the laboratory of Dr. Valery Krizhanovsky of the Molecular Cell Biology Department at the Weizmann Institute of Science.

 
 
 
During the postdoctoral studies he conducted at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in New York before coming to Weizmann, Krizhanovsky and his colleagues revealed that cellular senescence plays a much more active role in fighting and preventing various diseases than previously thought. For example, tumors shrink during chemotherapy not only because cancer cells self-destruct, but also because a rising number of these cells becomes senescent.

Moreover, Krizhanovsky discovered that in the liver, cellular senescence is necessary to prevent disease. When liver cells are damaged by the hepatitis virus, fatty liver disease or alcohol abuse, cells called fibroblasts start dividing to repair the damaged tissue. Krizhanovsky found that when the fibroblasts undergo senescence and stop reproducing, the repair process stops and the tissue can return to the normal, pre-damage state. This senescence is needed to prevent a different kind of damage: It averts fibrosis, the overproduction of scar tissue by the fibroblasts, which in turn can lead to cirrhosis of the liver, a common cause of death in developed countries.  

Krizhanovsky then showed that yet another important phase in the healthy maintenance of tissues is the clearance of such senescent cells from the body. In the liver, the immune system’s “natural killers,” the NK cells, enter the picture, removing the senescent fibroblasts. If the removal is impaired or if the fibroblasts don’t become senescent, the result is continuous liver damage. “Cellular senescence provides first aid, like a clamp fastened on a torn artery to stop bleeding,” Krizhanovsky says. “But just as the clamp will cause harm if it’s not removed in time, so senescent cells that are not cleared properly from the body start releasing inflammatory substances, which in the long run cause damage to surrounding tissues.”
 
Senescent liver cells in culture
 
In more recent research conducted at the Weizmann Institute, Krizhanovsky uncovered the molecular mechanisms that underlie the clearance of senescent cells. He identified the receptors on their surface that help their identification by the NK cells; in addition, he found that the NKs kill the senescent cells by releasing a protein that perforates cellular membranes and lets a killer protein get into the cell.

With the help of drugs based on these mechanisms, it may be possible in the future to prevent fibrosis of the liver or other organs, or to treat aging-related diseases, such as certain forms of arthritis or atherosclerosis, in which senescent cells are involved. The drugs will help remove senescent cells that the body is not clearing properly.

Such drugs may also help prevent cancer. In the past few years, scientists have shown that cellular senescence is one of the body’s natural mechanisms for blocking cancer in its early stages. That is probably the reason many precancerous growths, such as moles that with time might turn into melanoma, contain a large proportion of senescent cells. An efficient removal of these cells from the body may help avert the transformation of precancerous lesions into full-blown cancer.

And in a more distant future, it may even be possible to remove senescent cells from tissues to delay aging and promote health over the years.


From Embryos to Aging Cells


During his doctoral research at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Dr. Valery Krizhanovsky studied the fate of cells in embryonic development. But his interest in cellular fate in more general terms ultimately led him to the other extreme of the cellular lifespan: senescence.

Krizhanovsky, born in Ukraine, had begun his studies at the University of Kursk in Russia, in the faculty of pharmacology. When he immigrated to Israel with his parents in 1991, he continued his studies at the Hebrew University. Starting in 2005, he went on to conduct postdoctoral research at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in New York, before joining the faculty of the Weizmann Institute in 2010.

Krizhanovsky lives in Rehovot with his wife Regina and their two daughters, Maya and Mika. In his spare time, he enjoys reading, particularly on theories and the psychology of economics.
 
 

Dr. Valery Krizhanovsky’s research is supported by the Simms / Mann Family Foundation; the Victor Pastor Fund for Cellular Disease Research; and Lord David Alliance, CBE. Dr. Krizhanovsky is the incumbent of the Carl and Frances Korn Career Development Chair in the Life Sciences.

 
 

 

 

 

 
Senescent liver cells in culture
Life Sciences
English

A Viral “Crook” Cracks Many Locks

English
In short
    VSV is a useful virus – one that is used to insert therapeutic genes into cells, and that can selectively kill cancer cells.
    Scientists had assumed that VSV uses the LDL (“bad” cholesterol) receptor to break into cells, but it manages to get into cells without the receptor, as well.
    Experiments show that this virus can enter though a number of related receptors in the LDL family.
 
A master trickster virus called VSV has baffled scientists for quite some time. Because VSV is a true expert at sneaking into cells, it is widely used in gene therapy and might, in the future, help to treat cancer. Yet even though it’s been employed in research and in pre-clinical studies for over 30 years, how it gets into cells has remained a mystery. Weizmann Institute scientists have now solved this riddle, as reported in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).
 
VSV is particularly suitable for research and therapeutic use because, although it causes disease in farm animals, it rarely does so in humans. Yet the virus is so good at penetrating human cells that scientists commonly use it in experimental gene therapy as a vehicle to deliver desired genes to cells. In addition, VSV holds promise for use in cancer therapy because it selectively kills cancer cells.
(l-r) Dr. Daniela Novick, Prof. Menachem Rubinstein, Dr. Danit Finkelshtein and Sara Barak
 
Some 20 years ago, Prof. Menachem Rubinstein and his colleagues in the Weizmann Institute’s Molecular Genetics Department discovered that virus-infected cells secrete a soluble protein that prevents further VSV infection. They then found that this soluble protein is identical to the extra-cellular portion of the receptor for LDL, the “bad” cholesterol. This observation led them to assume that VSV penetrates cells by binding to the cells’ surface receptor of LDL. But when they conducted experiments with cells that lacked LDL receptors, VSV was still able to get in.

In the new study, Rubinstein’s team – research student Danit Finkelshtein, working together with Dr. Ariel Werman, Dr. Daniela Novick and Sara Barak – revealed that VSV can indeed cheat its way into cells through the LDL receptor. The virus can do that because it is coated with a decoy molecule mimicking LDL: This decoy acts as a key that opens the LDL receptor “lock” on the cell’s surface.

 
But how does the virus infect cells lacking the LDL receptor? The researchers explored the hypothesis that VSV lets itself in through more than one receptor – that is, not only through LDL but also through alternative, structurally similar receptors that must all be members of what is known as the LDL receptor family. To test this hypothesis, they conducted experiments with a versatile protein called RAP, which blocks all family members of the LDL receptor (but, oddly, not the LDL receptor itself).
Top: Human cells light up with green fluorescenTop: Human cells light up with green fluorescent markers after being penetrated by a genetically engineered virus coated with the VSV envelope protein; Bottom: The decoy LDL-like structures on the surface of the virus have been blocked by the soluble fragment of the LDL receptor; as a result, the virus fails to infect the cells, hence the absence of the green markers. Cell nuclei are stained bluet markers after being penetrated by a genetically engineered virus coated with the VSV envelope protein; Bottom: The decoy LDL-like structures on the surface of the virus have been blocked by the soluble fragment of the LDL receptor; as a result, the virus fails to infect the cells, hence the absence of the green markers. Cell nuclei are stained blue
 
 
Indeed, when they pretreated cells lacking LDL receptors with the RAP protein, VSV was no longer able to penetrate these cells. In other words, the experiments bore out the hypothesis: VSV gets into cells mainly through the LDL receptor but also through other members of the LDL receptor family.
 
This new understanding may be of potential importance for the development of VSV-based cancer therapies. In particular, colon cancer cells have high levels of the LDL receptor on their surface, which suggests they could be selectively killed by VSV.
 
The new findings might also help improve gene therapy, by increasing the number of LDL receptors on the outer membranes of targeted cells – to facilitate the entry of viruses that carry a desired gene. This goal could, for example, be achieved by the anti-cholesterol drugs statins, which cause cells to display more LDL receptors on their surfaces.
 
Prof. Menachem Rubinstein’s research is supported by the Bernard and Audrey Jaffe Foundation; the Adelis Foundation; and the Florence Blau Charitable Trust. Prof. Rubinstein is the incumbent of the Maurice and Edna Weiss Professorial Chair of Cytokines Research.
 
Top: Live cells lacking LDL receptors. Middle: These cells are killed by a VSV infection. Bottom: Protected by the RAP protein, these cells survive a VSV infection
 
 
 
 
 
 
Human cells light up with green fluorescent markers after being penetrated by a genetically engineered virus coated with the VSV envelope protein
Life Sciences
English

Alternate Endings

English
 
Drs. Keren Yacobi-Sharon and Eli Arama
          

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

To save lives, it is sometimes vital to know as much as possible about death, in particular, the death of cells. For example, cancer chemotherapy works by activating a cellular death program called apoptosis. But if the molecular machinery of apoptosis is defective, or if the cancer cells learn to avoid apoptosis, which indeed they often do, chemotherapy becomes ineffective. Therefore, the recent discovery at the Weizmann Institute of so-called germ cell death – an alternative cell death pathway – can be of great value for the development of future life-saving therapies.

 

In short

    Some germ cells – sperm precursors – undergo a special form of cell death that ensures quality control.
    Germ cell death differs from the main type – apoptosis – in a number of crucial ways.
•    These may point to new mechanisms for anti-cancer therapies.

In the study, which was reported in Developmental Cell, Dr. Eli Arama, senior intern Dr. Keren Yacobi-Sharon and graduate student Yuval Namdar, all of the Molecular Genetics Department, revealed a new mechanism that is responsible for the death of some male germ cells, the precursor cells that give rise to sperm, in the testis of the adult fruit fly.

Sperm cells are formed in a seemingly wasteful manner, which probably serves to ensure quality control: Germ cells are constantly created in large numbers, after which many of them die. By tracking the death of those cells in a living organism, the researchers were able to reveal its mechanics in great detail.
 
 
In an adult fruit fly testis, viewed under a confocal microscope, maturing germ cells (a nonapoptotic process) use active caspases (green); in contrast, dying germ cells (red) do not express activated caspases
 
First of all, the scientists confirmed that these germ cells do not die by apoptosis, the most common type of cell death. In particular, they showed that effector caspases, the destructive enzymes that execute apoptotic death, are not involved in germ cell death. Next, they defined the structural hallmarks of germ cell death. Like in apoptosis, the entire cell and its nucleus shrink, and the DNA becomes fragmented. However, many typical apoptotic features are missing in dying germ cells; moreover, unlike in apoptosis, these cells contain large degrading regions and their mitochondria, the energy-producing organelles, become distorted.  

The researchers discovered that a central role in germ cell death is played by the mitochondria: These organelles activate a particular gene, htrA2, which makes a destructive protease enzyme. HtrA2 has an equivalent in organisms ranging from bacteria to mammals, which suggests that the findings of the Weizmann fruit fly study are applicable to humans. Yet another major component of the germ cell death mechanism is the lysosome, the cell’s stomach-like organelle that is filled with enzymes for breaking down cellular waste and debris. Lysosomes contribute to cellular destruction by spilling out their contents.
 
Why do the cells need an alternative death pathway? One possible explanation is that germ cell death is the more ancient in evolutionary terms, while apoptosis, as well as the involvement of caspases in apoptotic death, may have evolved more recently. That could be why flowers and yeast lack conventional caspases and make use of a cell death pathway that is similar to germ cell death, whereas cell death is not the only function of the caspases in multicellular animals.
The tips of two adult fruit fly testes, viewed under a confocal microscope, are filled with dividing germ cells (green). About one quarter of these germ cells die by an alternative death pathway called germ cell death (pink and red)
 
Knowing the mechanism of germ cell death might have important implications for cancer research, among other things. It may, for instance, help explain the origins of testicular cancer, in which germ cells in the testes multiply uncontrollably. On a more general level, it may help in the development of anti-cancer drugs that could kill cells by an entirely new mechanism, helping to overcome the drug resistance that often emerges in response to more conventional chemotherapy.
 
Dr. Eli Arama’s research is supported by the Yeda-Sela Center for Basic Research; the Fritz Thyssen Stiftung; and the late Rudolfine Steindling. Dr. Arama is the incumbent of the Corinne S. Koshland Career Development Chair in Perpetuity.
 
The tips of two adult fruit fly testes, viewed under a confocal microscope, are filled with dividing germ cells (green). About one quarter of these germ cells die by an alternative death pathway called germ cell death (pink and red)
Life Sciences
English

The Path Taken

English

 Tslil Ast and Dr. Maya Schuldiner

                

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
“Biologists live in hope of discovering 'textbook examples’,” says Dr. Maya Schuldiner of the Molecular Genetics Department. To demonstrate, she opens a biology textbook and points to a diagram of a molecular pathway – a series of molecular interactions for getting a cellular protein or process from point A to point B. Since many proteins tend to use the same general molecular pathways, a textbook example should ideally reveal important insights into the working of a cell, and it may often generate reams of further study and discovery.

But textbook examples, says Schuldiner, are hiding a much more complex reality: “Generally, the pathways that are discovered first are assumed to be the most important. When we start finding proteins using other pathways, we call these ‘exceptions to the rule.’ Often, no one stops to ask how many proteins actually use one pathway or another.”

Schuldiner and research student Tslil Ast decided the time had come to ask that question. It was time, in part, because new technology would enable them to check many proteins at once: The high-throughput microscopy equipment and computational techniques used in Schuldiner’s lab are able to reveal the pathways of hundreds of cellular proteins in a fraction of the time formerly required to study just one or two.  
 
 
Endoplasmic reticulum. Image: Nicolle Rager, National Science Foundation
 
Schuldiner and Ast investigated the pathways taken by proteins to get into an organelle called the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), a maze-like series of folded membranes where the proteins undergo folding, quality control and routing to their next destination. The many and varied proteins passing through the ER are those that will eventually make their way out of the cell – hormones and external signaling molecules, as well as proteins that only make it as far as the outer face of the cell membrane. The well-studied pathway by which proteins enter the ER, discovered in the 1970s, is known as the SRP (signal recognition particle) pathway. The other pathways identified since are considered to be so insignificant that they are simply known as SRP-independent.

Is SRP truly the main pathway into the ER? The researchers surveyed all the ER-bound proteins in a baker’s yeast cell – some 1300 proteins. The answer was clear: Only about half of them strictly require the SRP pathway to get there. The rest can use other pathways; some of these pathways were partly known, but the findings hinted at undiscovered others, as well. The scientists found that, at least in yeast, there is a fairly clear-cut division: Proteins using the SRP pathway are those bound for the cell membrane. Because these pathways have been preserved throughout evolution, Schuldiner expects that a similar division exists in human cells. This means that the group of proteins using alternate pathways is likely to include many important hormones and signaling molecules.

The team is now working on developing a fuller picture of the parallel pathways. The ultimate goal is to identify all the molecular pathways for all of the cell’s exportable proteins. Rather than an ideal model, they expect to produce a complex picture that will better reflect actual protein behavior.

That may be bad news for the publishers of biology textbooks, but it’s good news for our understanding of living cells. “In the end,” says Schuldiner, “what we want to accomplish is a completely new image of how the cell works. We want researchers to stop looking ‘under the lamppost’ of the accepted models and broaden their scope to include all the possibilities.”
 
 
Dr. Maya Schuldiner's research is supported by the European Research Council; the Berlin Family Foundation; James and Ilene Nathan, Beverly Hills, CA; the Minna James Heineman Stiftung; the Enoch Foundation; Roberto and Renata Ruhman, Brazil; Karen Siem, UK; and the Kahn Family Research Center for Systems Biology of the Human Cell.
 
Endoplasmic reticulum. Image: Nicolle Rager, National Science Foundation
Life Sciences
English

Safer Stem Cell Scenario

English
 
 
Chromosomal analysis of a polyploid stem cell: This cell does not turn malignant despite having three or four copies of most chromosomes
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Any virtue taken to an extreme can become a flaw. Take, for instance, stem cells. They hold tremendous promise for repairing or even replacing diseased tissues, by virtue of being flexible and ready to grow. But left unchecked, this same growth can become a hazard: It can lead to cancer.

A new Weizmann Institute study might help avoid this danger. As reported recently in Cancer Research, the scientists, in collaboration with researchers from the Chaim Sheba Medical Center, have identified genetic markers that, for a certain type of stem cell, make it possible to predict the risk of any particular cell turning cancerous.
 
 
(l-r) Dr. Ofer Shoshani and Prof. Dov Zipori
 
These cells, called mesenchymal stromal stem cells, or MSCs, are particularly attractive for use in therapy. They are almost as versatile as embryonic cells but much more readily available: Found in adults in the bone marrow, skin, fat, muscle and other tissues, they can be removed in large numbers with relative ease. Precisely for these reasons, MSCs are already widely used in clinical trials; for example, they have been transplanted into fetuses to correct a congenital bone disorder. Results have been mixed, partly because the cells fail to survive for a long time after the transplant. But in the future, when scientists learn to improve their survival, a major concern will be to prevent MSCs from causing cancer.

When examining the cancer-causing potential of MSCs in the new study, the scientists were in for a surprise. Overall, cancer-causing MSCs were rare. However, diploid MSCs – that is, those with the normal number of chromosomes – were much more prone to turning cancerous than the polyploid ones – cells that have three or four copies of each chromosome instead of the usual two and that traditionally have been associated with cancer.

The scientists have identified a genetic marker that could be used to distinguish diploid cells from polyploid – a gene called H19: Its activity was more than a thousand times greater in diploid than in polyploid cells. H19 was also found to be a good indicator of a cell’s cancer-causing potential. In fact, when the scientists artificially prompted a diploid cell to become polyploid, its H19 levels dropped – and so did its tendency to turn malignant. H19 measurements can therefore serve as a means of selecting “safe” MSCs, ones with the lowest risk of causing cancer.

The idea that an abnormal number of chromosomes actually leads to less cancer goes against prevalent scientific thinking: How is it possible that the study’s findings run so counter to existing views on polyploidy and cancer?
 
Polyploid stem cells under a fluorescent microscope, in two stages of cell division: (Left): The centrosomes (red dots) – small organelles that help the DNA ( blue) to separate into two during cell division – begin to cluster on either side of the nucleus (Right): The centrosomes are grouped into two clusters (large red dots), allowing the DNA (blue) to be divided equally between the two daughter cells. As a result, the cell divides normally, without turning malignant
 
 
 
“Polyploidy is not a direct cause of cancer – on the contrary, it’s probably one of the many strategies used by cells to avoid cancer under stress,” says lead study author Prof. Dov Zipori of the Molecular Cell Biology Department, a pioneer of adult stem cell research. He and his colleagues propose the following explanation: When exposed to environmental stress, such as UV radiation or exposure to chemical carcinogens that can cause mutations in its DNA, the cell responds by duplicating its chromosomes. If the duplication occurs before the mutation, polyploidy has a protective effect: The cell now has much more DNA than before, so that the effect of the mutation is “diluted” by the newly created mass of genetic material. If, on the other hand, the duplication takes place after the mutation has been introduced, the protective strategy fails: The mutation is multiplied together with polyploidy and can lead to cancer.

In any event, what emerges from the study is that polyploidy in itself is not a predictor of cancer. Rather, the opposite is true: It is a sign that a cell has confronted stress and in some cases, though not all, successfully avoided malignancy.

The study was performed in mice in Zipori’s laboratory by Dr. Ofer Shoshani with the Weizmann Institute’s Hassan Massalha, Dr. Nir Shani, Sivan Kagan, Drs. Orly Ravid, Shalom Madar and Dena Leshkowitz, together with Prof. Gideon Rechavi and Dr. Luba Trakhtenbrot of the Sheba Medical Center.

If confirmed in further studies, this research could increase the safety of stem cell use in a variety of therapies, as well as giving scientists a better understanding of the cellular events that might lead to cancer.
 
Prof. Dov Zipori's research is supprted by the Helen and Martin Kimmel Institute for Stem Cell Research, which he heads; the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust; David and Molly Bloom, Canada; and Roberto and Renata Ruhman, Brazil.  Prof. Zipori is the incumbent of the Joe and Celia Weinstein Professorial Chair.
 
 



 
(l-r) Dr. Ofer Shoshani and Prof. Dov Zipori
Life Sciences
English

The Fat-Blood Connection

English

 

Microscope image of embryonic zebrafish blood vessels
 

 

 
Blocked or constricted blood vessels lead to high blood pressure, heart attack and stroke – some of the most common causes of death in the Western world. Blood vessels become blocked when fat is deposited on artery walls, building up until the flow of blood is restricted and the delivery of oxygen and nutrients curtailed. Today, such “clogged pipes” are cleared with drugs, angioplasty or bypass surgery to replace the blocked sections. But in the lab of the Weizmann Institute’s Dr. Karina Yaniv, researchers are looking for ways to keep the body’s main conduits from getting clogged up in the first place.
 
Type your text here
 
Caption
Type your text here
 
Type your text here
 
Caption
Type your text here
 
To prevent blockages, one must understand exactly how they occur. As opposed to the kitchen drainpipe, which gets clogged from the passive accumulation of gunk, the deposition of fat on blood vessel walls is an active process in which the cells lining those walls can sense fats carried in the bloodstream and respond according to amount and type. According to Yaniv, that fat and those vessel-lining cells – endothelial cells – engage in a two-way conversation that facilitates the fat build-up. Basically, the endothelial cells give the fat permission to cross the inner layer of the “pipe” to settle comfortably on the other side of that layer. As the fat layer grows, it presses on the blood vessel walls, constricting them and creating the conditions for blood vessel disease.
In the bottom microscope image, a mutation causes increased blood vessel growth, in contrast with those in a normal zebrafish embryo (top)
 
In research that appeared in Nature Medicine, Yaniv and her team in the Biological Regulation Department revealed how fat levels in the blood act on the endothelial cells. To travel in the bloodstream, fats are packaged into units along with proteins; these hold the fats and help them enter into the body’s cells. These units, called lipoproteins (fat-proteins) also contain cholesterol – either the “bad” cholesterol (LDL) or the “good” cholesterol (HDL). The research focused on units made with bad, LDL, type. Such lipoproteins have large fat-to-protein ratios, and they are known to be high risk factors for the development of blood vessel disease. “Medicine is concerned with the fat content of the LDL lipoprotein, but we showed that the protein component of this unit plays a crucial role in the conversation with the endothelial cells,” says Yaniv.
 
Working with zebrafish embryos, the research team first discovered a genetic mutation that causes the overproduction of blood vessels – almost twice the normal number. Their research showed that the mutated gene is responsible for the packaging and secreting of the LDL: It ties the fat molecules up with the transport protein, called ApoB, and then sends the packaged unit off into the bloodstream. When this gene was damaged in the fish, their bodies didn’t produce the bad cholesterol. A similar mutation exists in certain humans. Carriers of this mutation don’t produce LDL, and they don’t suffer from such fat-related blood-system diseases as arteriosclerosis.
 

 
 
How does LDL or its lack affect the growth of new blood vessels? The researchers found that lowering the bad cholesterol levels resulted in an increased division of the endothelial cells, while raising LDL levels had the opposite effect: Cell division was delayed, as was the cells’ ability to migrate and contribute to the formation of new blood vessels. Further investigation revealed that LDL directly interferes with a main mechanism of endothelial cell proliferation, in which a growth factor called VEGF binds to the cell surface to activate the process. VEGF can bind to two different types of receptors on the cell. The first is the “regular” receptor, which responds to VEGF binding by initiating cell proliferation. The second is a “dummy” receptor, which binds but does not initiate division. The dummy receptors are a sort of double-check and regulation mechanism, but LDL appears to encourage the production of this type of receptor. Thus high LDL levels mean more of the dummy receptors and less endothelial cell proliferation, while low levels promote cell division and, thus, the creation of new blood vessels.
  
(l-r) Yona Ely, Oded Mayseless, Liron Gibbs Bar, Moshe Grunspan, Dr. Inbal Avraham-Davidi, Dr. Guy Malkinson and Dr. Karina Yaniv
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 
 
It is the ApoB protein, which is packaged together with the cholesterol and triglycerides, that seems to act as a mediator between the lipoprotein units and the endothelial cells, and so its function is central to the formation of blockages. Understanding the mechanism by which ApoB and LDL contribute to endothelial cell damage may enable us, in the future, to adjust the process, possibly by promoting the production of new blood vessels to bypass the blocked sections.
 

 

Dr. Karina Yaniv's research is supported by the Karen Siem Fellowship for Women in Science; the Willner Family Center for Vascular Biology; the estate of Paul Ourieff; the Carolito Stiftung; Lois Rosen, Los Angeles, CA; the Adelis Foundation; and the Yeda-Sela Center for Basic Research. Dr. Yaniv is the incumbent of the Louis and Ida Rich Career Development Chair.

 

 

 
 
 
Microscope image of embryonic zebrafish blood vessels
Life Sciences
English

Complexity and the Single Cell

English
 
No matter how complex, all organisms – from the tiniest fruit fly to a human being – begin with a single cell. We know that this cell contains all the instructions for making every cell type in the body. The challenge is to uncover the overall plan laid out in the instruction book – the genome.  What makes a head at one end and a tail at the other, a front and back, and, continuing through embryonic development, all the complex and diverse patterns that make up the living creature?
A model predicting a “self-organized shuttling” mechanism in which the Toll activator, Spaetzle, is physically redistributed to the center of the belly region by another part of the same Spaetzle protein. The resulting gradient of Toll activation provides the cue for further patterning of the Drosophila embryo

 
At formation, the fruit fly egg cell takes on rough coordinates that distinguish the head end from the tail, the back from the belly. During embryonic development, these rough coordinates gradually become refined, the entire pattern of the complete organism ultimately arising from this simple process. The first refinement takes place after fertilization, in the initial steps of embryogenesis: The rough markings turn into a sharp gradient with certain hormone-like proteins concentrated thickly in the center of the future belly and thinning out toward the edges of the region. In research findings published in August in Cell, Profs. Naama Barkai and Ben-Zion Shilo, and Michal Haskel Ittah, Danny Ben-Zvi, Merav Branski Arieli and Dr. Eyal Schejter of the Molecular Genetics Department revealed how the embryo carries out this step – one that will soon give rise to a wide spectrum of cell types along the belly/back axis. “The surprising thing,” says Shilo, “is that it accomplishes this feat with only a handful of components.”

Those components had been identified through genetic screening over the years, and the researchers knew that somehow, this limited set of players is sufficient to convert the rough coordinates of the egg to the refined pattern of the embryo. What’s more, the critical action takes place in a thin zone between two membranes – the egg membrane and an external outer membrane.

While the genes could tell the scientists which components were involved, they could not reveal how those components formed a working mechanism. For that, the team turned to computational approaches, creating theoretical models to see which would yield the gradients they observed in experiments. They looked for gradients that would hold and which would be reproducible even when the levels of individual components varied. “We know from previous experience that this constraint strongly restricts the space of possible mechanisms,” says Barkai. Although the number of elements, indeed, was limited, the researchers proposed mechanism is fairly elaborate, with at least one of those elements taking on several different forms. This protein, the hormone that triggers the response, is called “spaetzle” (so-named because when it is missing, the embryo becomes elongated, like the German noodle).
 
 
Spaetzle, in its inactive form, is found encircling the entire inner membrane of the early embryo; the enzyme that activates it – by cleaving it into two parts – is active only in the belly region. Once spaetzle is activated, the two parts can diffuse out of the belly region, and they can also recombine in a different form that can then be reactivated in a new way. This interplay – between the elements that are able to diffuse past the edges of the belly region and those that are confined to it – creates a situation in which active spaetzle proteins are concentrated towards the belly region, thus producing the activation gradient.  Shilo: “We see, in our model, that the active form of the hormone is eventually driven in toward the center.”
Dorsal-GFP displaying a gradient of nuclear localization
 
With the mechanism proposed by the model in mind, the researchers turned back to experiments. They showed that the Spaetzle protein is indeed present in several distinct forms. When the team manipulated the genes for the elements in the model, they found they could direct the process of hormone concentration, even generating fruit fly embryos in which the belly region formed where the tail should be. These experiments convinced the researchers that the working model generated in computational approaches is truly valid.

The membrane receptors to which spaetzle binds are known as Toll receptors, and these were originally discovered in the 1980s in developing fruit fly embryos. The same Toll receptors were the subject of the 2011 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, but the prize was awarded for the discovery of a completely different role: They are vital for the innate immune response, our body’s first line of defense against invading pathogens. These receptors have been conserved over eons of evolution, and Shilo believes that the Toll receptor initially evolved for its crucial role in the immune system and was later co-opted for embryonic patterning in insects. Shilo: “It would be interesting to see whether the mechanism we discovered for concentrating the spaetzle proteins and creating a gradient might also apply to certain aspects of the innate immune response.”
 
 

 

 

 

 

Prof. Naama Barkai’s research is supported by the Azrieli Institute for Systems Biology, which she heads; the Helen and Martin Kimmel Award for Innovative Investigation; the Jeanne and Joseph Nissim Foundation for Life Sciences Research; Lorna Greenberg Scherzer, Canada; the Carolito Stiftung; the European Research Council; the estate of Hilda Jacoby-Schaerf; and the estate of John Hunter. Prof. Barkai is the incumbent of the Lorna Greenberg Scherzer Professorial Chair.
 
 

Prof. Ben-Zion Shilo’s research is supported by the Carolito Stiftung; the Jeanne and Joseph Nissim Foundation for Life Sciences Research; the Dr. Josef Cohn Minerva Center for Biomembrane Research; the estate of Georg Galai; and the Mary Ralph Designated Philanthropic Fund. Prof. Shilo is the incumbent of the Hilda and Cecil Lewis Professorial Chair of Molecular Genetics.

 
 
Dorsal-GFP displaying a gradient of nuclear localization
Life Sciences
English

The Slings and Arrows of Outrageous Cellular Fortune

English

Anat Florentin and Dr. Eli Arama

 
 
To die or not to die: That is the question all living cells face at some point in their lives. How this dilemma is ultimately resolved can have crucial consequences for our health. When cancer cells refuse to die, having developed a resistance to drugs, chemotherapy becomes ineffective. On the other hand, Parkinson’s disease and other neurodegenerative disorders occur when certain neurons in the brain die too readily. Understanding the precise mechanics of the major cellular death program, called apoptosis, is therefore essential for developing treatments for a variety of diseases.

Crucial new information about apoptosis has emerged from a Weizmann Institute study published recently in the Journal of Cell Biology. Dr. Eli Arama of the Molecular Genetics Department and Ph.D. student Anat Florentin have found a mechanism that makes some cells more sensitive to apoptosis than others, and they have established, in great detail, how the final stage of the cellular death program works.

Apoptosis can be triggered by a variety of signal sequences, but the final link, the “weapon” that performs the actual killing of the cell, is always the same: It consists mainly of utterly destructive enzymes – the effector caspases – which kill the cell by chopping up hundreds of cellular proteins. Until recently it was known that in mammalian cells two such enzymes, caspase-3 and caspase-7, were intimately involved in apoptosis, but their distinct roles in this process were unknown. Working with fruit flies, which have enzymes similar to the human caspases – Drice and Dcp-1, respectively – Arama and Florentin have produced a series of findings that make it possible to draw conclusions about the two mammalian caspases.
 
Budding wing from irradiated fruit fly larvae, magnified about 80 times; various aspects of apoptosis in a regular fly (left column) are compared with the mutant fly lacking the drice gene (right column). Upper row: “reporter” proteins are highlighted with green fluorescent protein; middle row: the cutting up of these reporter proteins by caspases; bottom row: numerous cells die by apoptosis in the regular fruit fly (left), whereas almost no apoptosis occurs in the fly lacking the Drice caspase (right)
 
Their results suggest that Drice is the major killing machine: It can destroy a cell on its own, even though it does work more efficiently in the presence of Dcp-1. As for Dcp-1, its major role is to set the pace of the killing, determining how fast and how many cells will die. Dcp-1 can also finish off the cell on its own, but this will happen only if it is present in large amounts.

In fact, one of the study’s central findings is that both caspases can kill cells only when their activity exceeds a certain threshold. Below that threshold, the cell can survive, replenishing the proteins destroyed by the caspases. This finding also explains how certain cells manage to use enzymes such as caspases to promote vital cellular processes without bringing destruction upon themselves: With low or transient levels, the cells avoid apoptosis while employing the caspases for other purposes.  

Why are two caspases necessary to perform essentially the same function? The scientists believe that the availability of two “weapons” offers greater precision in controlling the process than would be provided by a single killing enzyme. Drice is more of a sledgehammer, suitable for coarse demolition jobs, whereas Dcp-1 is more of a chisel, best suited to fine-tuned cellular elimination.

The study has shown that the tendency to undergo apoptosis, which varies greatly among different types of cells, is determined by the amount of the caspases present in the cell. Cells less prone to apoptosis are likely to have lower levels of the destructive enzymes. Among these are the brain’s neurons, which are limited in number, and the sperm and eye cells, which would perish upon each contact with the environment if they weren’t so resistant to apoptosis. In contrast, cells that are relatively expendable because they regenerate are more prone to apoptosis and these should have more caspases. These include hair cells and those in the inner lining of the gut, which must be continuously replaced after being damaged by digestive acids.

Florentin and Arama were able to discover these details about the workings of the caspases because they observed their function in living animals – genetically engineered fruit flies – rather than in tissue culture. To locate and quantify the activity of the different caspases in the flies’ bodies under a microscope, the scientists first inserted “reporter” genes into the flies’ genomes, and then relied on these reporters to highlight the proteins to be destroyed with a fluorescent dye.

By showing that the function of caspases is far more complex than previously thought, the new Weizmann study may have important implications for cancer drug development. In particular, the study suggests that in designing drugs intended to enhance apoptosis, researchers must make sure these raise the activity of the caspases above a critical threshold so that cancerous cells are effectively destroyed.
 
Dr. Eli Arama's research is supported by the Fritz Thyssen Stiftung; the M.D. Moross Institute for Cancer Research; the Y. Leon Benoziyo Institute for Molecular Medicine; the Jeanne and Joseph Nissim Foundation for Life Sciences Research; and the Yeda-Sela Center for Basic Research. Dr. Arama is the incumbent of the Corinne S. Koshland Career Development Chair in Perpetuity.


 
 
 
Budding wing from irradiated fruit fly larvae, magnified about 80 times; various aspects of apoptosis in a regular fly (left column) are compared with the mutant fly lacking the drice gene (right column). Upper row: “reporter” proteins are highlighted with green fluorescent protein; middle row: the cutting up of these reporter proteins by caspases; bottom row: numerous cells die by apoptosis in the regular fruit fly (left), whereas almost no apoptosis occurs in the fly lacking the Drice caspase (right)
Life Sciences
English

Synthetic Cells Stand In for the Real Thing

English

(l-r) Profs. Benjamin Geiger and Joachim Spatz

 

 

 
What makes one cell stick to its home base and another cell detach and migrate? How do cells “sense” their physical environment and respond? These questions go to the core of what it means to be a living cell, but the answers are anything but simple. Indeed, some of the most complex cellular systems – from yeast to human cells – are those for adhesion and environmental sensing.

“Add to that the complexity of a dynamic environment,” says Prof. Benjamin Geiger of the Weizmann Institute's Molecular Cell Biology Department, “and you have something that is very difficult to even define, much less describe in any useful way.”

That is why Geiger and Prof. Joachim Spatz of the Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Germany, have launched a project that presents a new approach to understanding the ways in which cells reach out to their surroundings. Simply put, they plan to conduct experiments with a man-made system in which synthetic cells – in the form of vesicles consisting of a simple lipid membrane and a handful of protein molecules – sit on synthetic substrates. Experimenting with these simplified models, in which the researchers can control every aspect of their design, will hopefully yield new insights into how living cells work. While the plan is admittedly ambitious, the payoff could be great: Adhesion and sensing are crucial to everything, from growth and development, to cell migration and tissue architecture, to – when the process goes awry – cancer metastasis.

The idea falls within the new field of synthetic biology, in which scientists take an engineering approach to the cell and its components. Spatz is a materials scientist and Geiger, a biologist. For the past several years, the two have worked closely together to create unique substrates, and used them to test living cells’ sensing abilities. Synthetic cells are the logical next step in the research process.

The scientists’ method for creating artificial cells begins with blood platelets – simple cells that have the ability to adhere to biological as well as artificial surfaces. The researchers remove everything but the cell’s outer “skin” and adhesion-mediating proteins, called integrins, which perform the actual sticking. Then, these proteins are extracted and inserted into synthetic vesicles, and additional components of the adhesion site are gradually added, a few at a time, so that the researchers can test as they go. In parallel, they will experiment with the substrate – controlling its properties down to the placement and spacing of individual molecules. As they analyze the results obtained from the synthetic system, Spatz and Geiger plan to recheck their findings in living cells, to see how well their progressing model reflects the considerably more complex reality.
 
Prof. Geiger explains: Synthetic cells and substrates will be checked against their natural counterparts in all permutations and combinations
 

 

 
Even such comparatively simple synthetic cell models are quite complicated. “If we manage to find the right combination to get these cells to respond to environmental cues,” says Spatz, “we will consider that a great success.” Eventually, the scientists intend to move past the present understanding – a “grocery list” of hundreds of individual molecules that participate in the molecular cross-talk underlying a cell’s adhesion and sensing mechanisms – toward  understanding how those individual bits and pieces come together to make functional components.

This new undertaking has already demonstrated one considerable success: The European Research Council (ERC) recently awarded the project a grant of 3.5 million euros. Such ERC Advanced Grants are specifically “aimed to promote substantial advances at the frontiers of knowledge and to encourage new productive lines of enquiry, including unconventional approaches and investigations at the interface between established disciplines.”

In addition to advancing the understanding of how living cells sense and respond to their environment, the scientists think the project may yield some interesting insights into the origins of living cells. Even before cells started to stick together to form multicellular organisms, they probably had rudimentary adhesion mechanisms for sensing and grabbing onto food – the most basic need of all.
 

Prof. Benjamin Geiger’s research is supported by the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust; the Adelis Foundation; the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research; the estate of Alice Schwarz-Gardos; IIMI, Inc.; and the European Research Council. Prof Geiger is the incumbent of the Professor Erwin Neter Professorial Chair of Cell and Tumor Biology.
 
(l-r) Profs. Benjamin Geiger and Joachim Spatz
Life Sciences
English

Pages