When Genes Conspire to Cause Disease

English
Prof. Eytan Domany and Dr. Libi Hertzberg
 
It has been known for a while that schizophrenia has a strong genetic component: The proof comes from studies of identical twins. But when researchers look for genes associated with the disease, they are confronted with a profound muddle: Hundreds of genes appear to be involved, but upon closer inspection each only confers a slightly higher than normal risk of developing the disease. Recent findings arising from a unique collaboration between researchers at the Weizmann Institute of Science and Shalvata Mental Health Center in Israel, and the Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York, suggest a way out of this mire.

Such disease-encoding genes are generally identified in so-called genome-wide association studies. The idea is to compare genomic sequences of thousands of subjects – patients as well as healthy people – and search for tiny differences of just one or two “letters” in the genetic sequences that make up the genes. If certain variations appear more frequently in those with a disease such as schizophrenia than in the healthy population, one can start asking whether the change in that particular letter is connected to the disease.

But with hundreds of somewhat feeble candidates, the data dissolve into “noise.” There is little way to tell if the switched letter is an alternate spelling or punctuation, or whether it will be like substituting “pear” for “peach” in a recipe – a slight but possibly significant alteration to the final dish. To further complicate things, many of the substituted letters in the genomes of people with schizophrenia show up in so-called non-coding regions – those that do not contain instructions for making proteins but, rather, regulate such things as protein levels. These sequences are not only less well studied and harder to identify than the ones in coding regions; their functions are difficult to observe in standard lab tests.
 
Unraveling this mystery presented a compelling challenge to Dr. Libi Hertzberg, who is no stranger to challenges. Hertzberg had been a master’s student under Prof. Eytan Domany, head of the computational biology group in the Institute’s Physics of Complex Systems Department. From there, she went on to Tel Aviv University to complete both an MD in the Sackler Faculty of Medicine and, concurrently, a PhD that was supervised, in part, by Domany. She is now at Shalvata Mental Health Center, as a resident in psychiatry, and, in addition to her demanding clinical work, has decided to research the basis of mental illness together with Domany.
Gene expression of schizophrenia-related genes. 1,028 genes with very similar expression profiles are shown, one to a row, and 480 samples are arrayed in the columns. Red-to-blue shows the strength of the gene's expression level, red being stronger
 
 
Domany and Hertzberg teamed up with Prof. Vahram Haroutunian of Mount Sinai. Domany, who holds the Weizmann Institute’s Henry J. Leir Professorial Chair, had met Haroutunian at an annual conference hosted for its researchers by the Leir Charitable Foundation, and the two realized that Haroutunian had a unique resource that could help solve the mystery: He has a database of information gleaned from post-mortem brains that have been donated to his lab, including those from schizophrenia patients. From these, he can test the levels of the messenger molecules – mRNA – that are produced from the various genes. In other words, scientists can use these data to understand how the genetic information translates into action in various brain cells.

Now the team had two very different sets of information – genes identified in the broad, genome-wide studies and the mRNA levels from the brain database – giving them a sort of “filter” that enabled them to identify the genetic sequences whose slight misspelling was not only associated with the disease but also exhibited interesting patterns of expression in the brain.
 
 
 
 

The team then began to analyze their narrowed-down list of genes: The approach Domany has developed over the years looks for the actions of groups of genes, rather than searching for the effects of a single gene, and this strategy worked well for the schizophrenia data. Using algorithms he and his team have developed to first identify paired correlations and from these, clusters, they ultimately identified a collection of around 19 genes that clearly stood out from the noise.

Now the question was: What does this group of genes do? That question is far from simple: there are hundreds of ways that these genes could interact and thousands of possible effects of their actions. Further computational analysis of the data revealed that the cluster of genes they had identified is associated with the functioning of the cells’ calcium channels. Nerve cells rely on these channels in their membranes to regulate the uptake of calcium ions, which excite the cells to action. Additional tests using information from the genome-wide studies and databases of protein interaction analyses supported their results.  

Hertzberg says that these findings give strong backing to the idea that calcium regulation plays a central role in schizophrenia, and adds that the genetic interactions they have revealed might present useful targets for drugs. Domany points out that the next step is to understand exactly how the regulation of calcium signaling goes awry in the disease – a step that will require much more research. But the scientists are hopeful that their results, in addition to pointing to a fruitful approach to understanding how genes contribute to neuropsychological disease might, in the future, lead to both better diagnostics and possible treatments for schizophrenia.

 

Prof. Eytan Domany’s research is supported by the Leir Charitable Foundations; and the Louis and Fannie Tolz Collaborative Research Project. Prof. Domany is the incumbent of the Henry J. Leir Professorial Chair.




 

 
Gene expression of schizophrenia-related genes. 1,028 genes with very similar expression profiles are shown, one to a row, and 480 samples are arrayed in the columns. Red-to-blue shows the strength of the gene's expression level, red being stronger
Life Sciences
English

Nice to Sniff You: Handshakes May Engage Our Sense of Smell

English
Why do people shake hands? A new Weizmann Institute study suggests one of the reasons for this ancient custom may be to check out each other’s odors. Even if we are not consciously aware of this, handshaking may provide people with a socially acceptable way of communicating via the sense of smell.
 
 
handshake illustration: Lee Zakai
 
Not only do people often sniff their own hands, but they do so for a much longer time after shaking someone else’s hand, the study has found. As reported today in the journal eLife, the number of seconds the subjects spent sniffing their own right hand more than doubled after an  experimenter greeted them with a handshake.

“Our findings suggest that people are not just passively exposed to socially-significant chemical signals, but actively seek them out,” said Idan Frumin, the research student who conducted the study under the guidance of Prof. Noam Sobel of Weizmann’s Neurobiology Department. “Rodents, dogs and other mammals commonly sniff themselves, and they sniff one another in social interactions, and it seems that in the course of evolution, humans have retained this practice – only on a subliminal level.”

To examine whether handshakes indeed transfer body odors, the researchers first had experimenters wearing gloves shake the subjects’ bare hands, then tested the glove for smell residues. They found that a handshake alone was sufficient for the transfer of several odors known to serve as meaningful chemical signals in mammals. “It’s well known that germs can be passed on through skin contact in handshakes, but we’ve shown that potential chemical messages, known as chemosignals, can be passed on in the same manner,” Frumin says.

Next, to explore the potential role of handshakes in communicating odors, the scientists used covert cameras to film some 280 volunteers before and after they were greeted by an experimenter, who either shook their hand or didn’t. The researchers found that after shaking hands with an experimenter of the same gender, subjects more than doubled the time they later spent sniffing their own right hand (the shaking one). In contrast, after shaking hands with an experimenter of the opposite gender, subjects increased the sniffing of their own left hand (the non-shaking one). “The sense of smell plays a particularly important role in interactions within gender, not only across gender as commonly assumed,” Frumin says.

The scientists then performed a series of tests to make sure the hand-sniffing indeed served the purpose of checking out odors and was not merely a stress-related response to a strange situation. First, they measured nasal airflow during the task and found that subjects were truly sniffing their hands and not just lifting them to their nose. It turned out that the amount of air inhaled by the volunteers through the nose doubled when they brought their hands to their face. Next, the scientists found they could manipulate the hand-sniffing by artificially introducing different smells into the experimental setting. For example, when experimenters were tainted with a commercial unisex perfume, the hand-sniffing increased. In contrast, when the experimenters were tainted with odors derived from sex hormones, the sniffing decreased. These final tests confirmed the olfactory nature of the hand-sniffing behavior.

Taking part in the study were Ofer Perl, Yaara Endevelt-Shapira, Ami Eisen, Neetai Eshel, Iris Heller, Maya Shemesh, Aharon Ravia, Dr. Lee Sela and Dr. Anat Arzi, all of Prof. Sobel’s lab

“Handshakes vary in strength, duration and posture, so they convey social information of various sorts,” says Prof. Sobel. “But our findings suggest that at its evolutionary origins, handshaking might have also served to convey odor signals, and such signaling may still be a meaningful, albeit subliminal, component of this custom.”
 


 
Prof. Noam Sobel’s research is supported by the Norman and Helen Asher Center for Brain Imaging, which he heads; the Nella and Leon Benoziyo Center for Neurosciences, which he heads; the Carl and Micaela Einhorn-Dominic Institute for Brain Research, which he heads; the Nadia Jaglom Laboratory for the Research in the Neurobiology of Olfaction; the Adelis Foundation; Mr. and Mrs. H. Thomas Beck, Canada; the James S. McDonnell Foundation 21st Century Science Scholar in Understanding Human Cognition Program; the Minerva Foundation; the European Research Council; Nathan and Dora Oks, France; Mike and Valeria Rosenbloom through the Mike Rosenbloom Foundation; and the estate of David Levidow.
 
handshake illustration: Lee Zakai
Life Sciences
English

Rewiring

English
Our brain’s networks are shaped, among other things, by our bodily interactions with the environment. How do our physical, daily activities affect our brain networks? Research student Avital Hahamy and Prof. Rafi Malach of the Neurobiology Department teamed up with a group of researchers at Oxford University, led by Dr. Tamar Makin, to find an original way to explore this question. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), they compared the resting brain activity of individuals who had been born lacking a hand with a control, “two-handed,” group.
 
Avital Hahamy and Prof. Rafi Malach
        

 

 
 
Malach’s group has helped develop the field of resting brain research: When brains are at rest, spontaneous patterns of brain activity emerge across their two hemispheres, revealing how corresponding areas synchronize their activity. In this study, which recently appeared in eLife, the researchers were looking at the level of synchronization between the brain areas in each hemisphere that control the movements of the two hands. They asked whether the absence of a hand can change the levels of synchronization between the corresponding brain regions. The researchers also wanted to understand if changes in brain synchronization may relate to daily behaviors, especially the ways in which one-handed individuals physically compensate for their physical disability. In other words, how does brain activity during the resting state reflect routine, every-day behavior?
 
The researchers found that individuals lacking a hand had less synchronization between the brain regions controlling hand movements than that of two-handed people. However, these differences appeared to depend on each person's habitual behavior: The less a person used his stump as a hand, the less synchronization was apparent in his brain. In contrast, individuals who compensated for the absence of a hand by using their stump as a hand showed high synchronization of brain activity, resembling that of two-handed people. In other words, say the researchers, the deep-seated coordination between the two halves of our brain and the physical coordination between the two sides of our bodies go hand in hand (so to speak). The findings hint, more broadly, at how our daily behaviors are "encoded" in our resting brain activity.
 
Prof. Rafael Malach's research is supported by the Murray H. and Meyer Grodetsky Center for Research of Higher Brain Functions, which he heads; and Friends of Dr. Lou Siminovitch. Prof. Malach is the recipient of the Helen and Martin Kimmel Award for Innovative Investigation; and he is the incumbent of the Barbara and Morris L. Levinson Professorial Chair in Brain Research.




 
 

 
 

Avital Hahamy and Prof. Rafi Malach
Life Sciences
English

Israel-Japan Conference to Foster Cooperation in Brain Research

English

Japanese and Israeli scientists at the Advances in Brain Sciences conference

 
 

 

 
Following the visit of Japan’s Prime Minister, Shinzo Abe, to Israel in the beginning of the week, the end of the week of January 18th saw a visit by a group of leading Japanese scientists to Rehovot, Israel. The Advances in Brain Sciences conference the scientists attended was jointly hosted by the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot and the RIKEN Brain Science Institute in Japan. The parallels were more than incidental: Abe and Israel’s Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, discussed furthering business, research and development contacts between the countries; Weizmann and RIKEN researchers are already working to advance scientific collaboration between the two institutes and the two countries.

The Weizmann Institute’s Dr. Ofer Yizhar, one of the conference organizers, is currently involved in a collaborative research project with RIKEN researcher Toru Takumi. “Takumi creates mice that have a genetic defect which mimics autism, while my optogenetics lab can work with these mice, turning neurons in the brain “on” and “off” with light. Together, we hope to discover how autistic spectrum disorder develops in the brain and what neural mechanisms are involved in autistic behaviorisms,” says Yizhar.

Over the two days of the conference, speakers touched on many different aspects of brain research: Yasunori Hayashi of RIKEN, for example, gave a talk on the roles of the cells’ internal cytoskeleton in maintaining the plasticity of the synapses between certain brain cells. The Weizmann Institute’s Prof. Rony Paz talked about his findings showing how our tendency to overgeneralize may sometimes work against us, for example, when memories of traumatic events turn into post-traumatic disorders. The keynote speaker, Prof. Shimon Ullman of the Weizmann Institute, gave a talk on visual recognition – a subject that crosses the boundaries between neuroscience and artificial intelligence. Ullman, who has worked with RIKEN’s Dr. Tanifuji for a number of years, says: “Scientific and personal connections have deepened over the years, and we are currently planning the next steps of joint work in the future.”  

Informal events and visits to labs during the two-day conference gave the researchers from the two countries an opportunity to meet and discuss ideas for future research directions. “RIKEN is the premier brain research center in Japan, and one of the best in the world,” says Prof. Yadin Dudai, one of the conference organizers. “We see that much of Weizmann Institute research complements that being done in Japan; there is great potential to work together in many areas. This can benefit both sides, and we hope to see more cooperation in the future.”  
 
 
Japanese and Israeli scientists at the Advances in Brain Sciences conference
Life Sciences
English
Yes

Autistic Brains Go Their Own Way

English

 

Some brains are idiosyncratic
 
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) has been studied for many years, but there are still more questions than answers. For example, some research into the brain functions of individuals on the autism spectrum have found a lack of synchronization between different parts of the brain that normally work in tandem. But other studies have found the exact opposite – over-synchronization in the brains of those with ASD. A new study by Avital Hahamy and Prof. Rafi Malach of the Weizmann Institute’s Neurobiology Department, and Prof. Marlene Behrmann of Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, which was recently published in Nature Neuroscience, suggests that the various reports – of both over- and under-connectivity – may, in fact, reflect a deeper principle.

To investigate the issue of connectivity in ASD, the researchers analyzed data obtained from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies conducted while the participants were at rest. These had been collected from a large number of participants at multiple sites and handily assembled in the ABIDE database. “Resting-state brain studies are important,” says Hahamy, “because that is when patterns emerge spontaneously, allowing us to see how various brain areas naturally connect and synchronize their activity.” A number of previous studies in Malach’s group and others suggest that these spontaneous patterns may provide a window into individual behavioral traits, including those that stray from the norm.

In a careful comparison of the details of these intricate synchronization patterns, the researchers discovered an intriguing difference between the control and ASD groups: The control participants’ brains had substantially similar connectivity profiles across different individuals, whereas those with ASD showed a remarkably different phenomenon. These tended to display much more unique patterns – each in its own, individual way. The researchers realized that the synchronization patterns seen in the control group were “conformist” relative to those in the ASD group, which they termed "idiosyncratic."  

The researchers offer a possible explanation for differences between the synchronization patterns in the autism and control groups: They might be a product of the ways in which individuals in the two groups interact and communicate with their environment. Hahamy: “From a young age, the average, typical person’s brain networks get molded by intensive interaction with people and the mutual environmental factors. Such shared experiences could tend to make the synchronization patterns in the control group’s resting brains more similar to each other. It is possible that in ASD, as interactions with the environment are disrupted, each one develops a more uniquely individualistic brain organization pattern.”

The researchers emphasize that this explanation is only tentative; much more research will be needed to fully uncover the range of factors that may lead to ASD-related idiosyncrasies. They also suggest that further research into how and when different individuals establish particular brain patterns could help in the future development of early diagnosis and treatment for autism disorders.

Prof. Rafael Malach’s research is supported by the Murray H. and Meyer Grodetsky Center for Research of Higher Brain Functions, which he heads; and the Friends of Dr. Lou Siminovitch. Prof. Malach is the recipient of the Helen and Martin Kimmel Award for Innovative Investigation; and he is the incumbent of the Barbara and Morris L. Levinson Professorial Chair in Brain Research.

 
 
Some brains are idiosyncratic
Life Sciences
English

3D Compass in the Brain

English

batPilots are trained to guard against vertigo: a sudden loss of the sense of vertical direction that renders them unable to tell “up” from “down” and sometimes even leads to crashes. Coming up out of a subway station can produce similar confusion: For a few moments, you are unsure which way to go, until regaining your sense of direction. In both cases, the disorientation is thought to be caused by a temporary malfunction of a brain circuit that operates as a three-dimensional (3D) compass.


Weizmann Institute scientists have now for the first time demonstrated the existence of such a 3D compass in the mammalian brain. The study was performed by graduate student Arseny Finkelstein in the laboratory of Prof. Nachum Ulanovsky of the Neurobiology Department, together with Dr. Dori Derdikman, Dr. Alon Rubin, Jakob N. Foerster and Dr. Liora Las. As reported in Nature on December 3, the researchers have shown that the brains of bats contain neurons that sense which way the bat’s head is pointed and could therefore support the animal’s navigation in 3D space.

Navigation relies on spatial memory: past experience of different locations. This memory is formed primarily in a deep-seated brain structure called the hippocampal formation.  In mammals, three types of brain cells, located in different areas of the hippocampal formation, form key components of the navigation system: “place” and “grid” cells, which work like a GPS, allowing animals to keep track of their position; and “head-direction” cells, which respond whenever the animal’s head points in a specific direction, acting like a compass. Much research has been conducted on place and grid cells, whose discoverers were awarded the 2014 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, but until recently, head-direction cells have been studied only in two-dimensional (2D) settings, in rats, and very little was known about the encoding of 3D head direction in the brain.

To study the functioning of head-direction cells in three dimensions, Weizmann Institute scientists developed a tracking apparatus that allowed them to video-monitor all the three angles of head rotation – in flight terminology, yaw, pitch and roll – and to observe the movements of freely-behaving Egyptian fruit bats. At the same time, the bats’ neuronal activity was monitored via implanted microelectrodes. Recordings made with the help of these microelectrodes revealed that in a specific sub-region of the hippocampal formation, neurons are tuned to a particular 3D angle of the head: Certain neurons became activated only when the animal’s head was pointed at that 3D angle.

The study also revealed for the first time how the brain computes a sense of the vertical direction, integrating it with the horizontal. It turns out that in the neural compass, these directions are computed separately, at different levels of complexity: The scientists found that head-direction cells in one region of the hippocampal formation became activated in response to the bat’s orientation relative to the horizontal surface, that is, facilitating the animal’s orientation in two dimensions, whereas cells responding to the vertical component of the bat’s movement – that is, a 3D orientation – were located in another region. The researchers believe that the 2D head-direction cells could serve for locomotion along surfaces, as happens in humans when driving a car, whereas the 3D cells could be important for complex maneuvers in space, such as climbing tree branches or, in the case of humans, moving through multi-story buildings or piloting an aircraft.  

By further experimenting on inverted bats, those hanging head-down, the scientists were able to clarify how exactly the head-direction signals are computed in the bat brain. It turned out that these computations are performed in a way that can be described by an exceptionally efficient system of mathematical coordinates (the technical term is “toroidal”). Thanks to this computational approach used by their brain, the bats can efficiently orient themselves in space whether they are moving head up or down.

This research supports the idea that head-direction cells in the hippocampal formation serve as a 3D neural compass. Though the study was conducted in bats, the scientists believe their findings should also apply to non-flying mammals, including squirrels and monkeys that jump between tree branches, as well as humans. “Now this blueprint can be applied to other species that experience 3D in a more limited sense,” Prof. May-Britt Moser, one of the 2014 Nobel laureates, writes in the “News and Views” opinion piece that accompanies the Weizmann study in Nature.

Prof. Ulanovsky's research is supported by the Rowland and Sylvia Schaefer Family Foundation; Mike and Valeria Rosenbloom through the Mike Rosenbloom Foundation; the Irving B. Harris Foundation; Mr. and Mrs. Steven Harowitz, San Francisco, CA; and the European Research Council.
 
 
bat
Life Sciences
English

Scientists Identify the Signature of Aging in the Brain

English

 

Immunofluorescence microscope image of the choroid plexus. Epithelial cells are in green and chemokine proteins (CXCL10) are in red
 
How the brain ages is still largely an open question – in part because this organ is mostly insulated from direct contact with other systems in the body, including the blood and immune systems. In research that was recently published in Science, Weizmann Institute researchers Prof. Michal Schwartz of the Neurobiology Department and Dr. Ido Amit of Immunology Department found evidence of a unique “signature” that may be the “missing link” between cognitive decline and aging. The scientists believe that this discovery may lead, in the future, to treatments that can slow or reverse cognitive decline in older people.

Until a decade ago, scientific dogma held that the blood-brain barrier prevents the blood-borne immune cells from attacking and destroying brain tissue. Yet in a long series of studies, Schwartz’s group had shown that the immune system actually plays an important role both in healing the brain after injury and in maintaining the brain’s normal functioning. They have found that this brain-immune interaction occurs across a barrier that is actually a unique interface within the brain’s territory.

This interface, known as the choroid plexus, is found in each of the brain’s four ventricles, and it separates the blood from the cerebrospinal fluid. Schwartz: “The choroid plexus acts as a ‘remote control’ for the immune system to affect brain activity. Biochemical ‘danger’ signals released from the brain are sensed through this interface; in turn, blood-borne immune cells assist by communicating with the choroid plexus.This cross-talk is important for preserving cognitive abilities and promoting the generation of new brain cells.”
 
This finding led Schwartz and her group to suggest that cognitive decline over the years may be connected not only to one’s “chronological age” but also to one’s “immunological age,” that is, changes in immune function over time might contribute to changes in brain function – not necessarily in step with the count of one’s years.

To test this theory, Schwartz and research students Kuti Baruch and Aleksandra Deczkowska teamed up with Amit and his research group in the Immunology Department. The researchers used next-generation sequencing technology to map changes in gene expression in 11 different organs, including the choroid plexus, in both young and aged mice, to identify and compare pathways involved in the aging process.
 
That is how they identified a strikingly unique “signature of aging” that exists solely in the choroid plexus – not in the other organs. They discovered that one of the main elements of this signature was interferon beta – a protein that the body normally produces to fight viral infection. This protein appears to have a negative effect on the brain: When the researchers injected an antibody that blocks interferon beta activity into the cerebrospinal fluid of the older mice, their cognitive abilities were restored, as was their ability to form new brain cells. The scientists were also able to identify this unique signature in elderly human brains. The scientists hope that this finding may, in the future, help prevent or reverse cognitive decline in old age, by finding ways to rejuvenate the “immunological age” of the brain.

 
Dr. Ido Amit’s research is supported by the M.D. Moross Institute for Cancer Research; the J&R Center for Scientific Research; the Jeanne and Joseph Nissim Foundation for Life Sciences Research; the Abramson Family Center for Young Scientists; the Wolfson Family Charitable Trust; the Abisch Frenkel Foundation for the Promotion of Life Sciences; the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust; Sam Revusky, Canada; the Florence Blau, Morris Blau and Rose Peterson Fund; the estate of Ernst and Anni Deutsch; the estate of Irwin Mandel; and the estate of David Levinson. Dr. Amit is the incumbent of the Alan and Laraine Fischer Career Development Chair.
 
Prof. Michal Schwartz’s research is supported by the Jeanne and Joseph Nissim Foundation for Life Sciences Research; the Adelis Foundation; the European Research Council; Nathan and Dora Oks, France; and Hilda Namm, Larkspur, CA. Prof. Schwartz is the incumbent of the Maurice and Ilse Katz Professorial Chair of Neuroimmunology.
 
 
Immunofluorescence microscope image of the choroid plexus. Epithelial cells are in green and chemokine proteins (CXCL10) are in red
Life Sciences
English

Curiosity and Constraint

English
Measuring the response to novelty: A mouse repeatedly touches the object and pulls away (nose and whisker contacts are color-coded; d is the distance of the snout from the object)
 
 
 
Put a young child in a new playground and she may take a while to start playing – approaching the slide and then running back to Mom before finally stepping on. A new model suggests that it is not fear that makes her run back and forth, but simply the fact that her brain is telling her to stop and take in the new information – the height of the slide or how slippery it appears – before going any further. Drs. Goren Gordon and Ehud Fonio, and Prof. Ehud Ahissar, believe that this is a basic pattern in mammals that governs how we learn. The mathematical model they developed and tested in experiments suggests that our innate curiosity is tempered by mechanisms in our brains that curb our ability to absorb novelty.   

In Ahissar’s lab in the Institute's Neurobiology Department, researchers investigate how animals sense their surroundings. Previous research in which Fonio had participated showed that in a new situation, a mouse would approach an unfamiliar space, retreat to familiar surroundings, and then approach again. When Gordon, Fonio and Ahissar examined how mice used their whiskers to feel out a novel object, a similar pattern ensued: The whisker would touch the object, pull back, and then touch it again. Gradually, as the mouse became familiar with one part of its surroundings, it would begin to explore further, moving away from the known part. The pattern was so consistent, the researchers thought they could create a model to explain how a mouse – or another mammal – explores new surroundings.
 
The researchers based their model on the premise that novelty can be measured and that the amount of novelty could be a primary factor in shaping the way that a mouse – or its whisker – will move through an environment. This model successfully reproduced the results of the previous study, in which the movement of the mouse gradually became more complex through the addition of measurable degrees of freedom. For example, it began with movement along a wall, as opposed to traveling across the open space. Using data from the previous experiments and others for which such data were available, they were able to construct a model that required very few additional assumptions.

The model suggested that novelty, per se, was not the deciding factor, but rather how much the novelty varied within a given situation. Approaching and retreating appear to be a way to keep the amount of new information within a constant range. Like the wavering child in the playground, the mice would absorb a certain amount of new sensory input – the curve of a new wall, for example – retreat, and approach again once the novel information was already starting to become familiar.

Dr. Goren Gordon and Prof. Ehud Ahissar
 
To test the model, the researchers designed an experimental setup in which a family of mice was born and raised in a den, and then a gate was opened from the den to a new area in which the pups could freely explore and return to their familiar den. The researchers found that the model was able to predict how the mice would explore their new surroundings. It held true whether it was applied to locomotion or to the motion of whiskers in feeling out new objects. The initial movements explored the most novel features of the new environment. After those were learned, just as the model predicted, the animals moved further afield, exploring the still-unknown parts of their surroundings.

Gordon: “The mice were not given rewards for their behavior – for them, as for humans, satisfying curiosity is its own reward.” Fonio: “This behavioral pattern enables the mice to control the level of sensory stimulus to their brains by regulating the amount of novelty they are exposed to.” These limits to novelty and exploration may, of course, have another evolutionary advantage: While the urge to explore is necessary for animals that must seek out food, stopping to check out the surroundings a bit at a time could be a prudent survival strategy. In other words, curiosity may have killed the cat, but a whisker pulled back in time might save the mouse.
 
Does this model apply to humans? Gordon points out that when we learn a new subject, we often need time to think things over before going on to the next topic. Further research might reveal whether young children, for example babies just learning to crawl, explore their new surroundings in the same way. Even an adult entering a new situation might undergo a similar process.

In the future, a mathematical model of learning might prove useful for teachers and students, as well as for research into neurological issues involving the ability to absorb new information. In addition, this model might someday be used in the field of robotics: Robots that learn on their own, like mice, to explore a new setting might be able to function in situations that are too dangerous for humans, for example, the aftermath of an earthquake or a nuclear power plant accident.
 
Prof. Ehud Ahissar’s research is supported by the Murray H. and Meyer Grodetsky Center for Research of Higher Brain Functions; the Jeanne and Joseph Nissim Foundation for Life Sciences Research; the Kahn Family Research Center for Systems Biology of the Human Cell; Lord David Alliance, CBE; the Berlin Family Foundation; Jack and Lenore Lowenthal, Brooklyn, NY; Research in Memory of Irving Bieber, M.D. and Toby Bieber, M.D.; the Harris Foundation for Brain Research; and the Joseph D. Shane Fund for Neurosciences. Prof. Ahissar is the incumbent of the Helen Diller Family Professorial Chair in Neurobiology.





 
 


 

 
Measuring the response to novelty: A mouse repeatedly touches the object and pulls away (nose and whisker contacts are color-coded; d is the distance of the snout from the object)
Life Sciences
English

Pheromones Regulate Aggression of Non-Mother Female Mice toward Pups in Wild-Derived Mice

English
 
Laboratory mice are one of the most common animal models used in biological and medical research. Thousands of laboratory mouse strains are produced by artificial selection – the process by which humans breed animals over dozens of generations for particular traits. This has led to the domestication of mice: strengthening specific qualities that make them well-adapted for research under laboratory conditions, such as rapid reproduction, while eliminating characteristics that are not conducive to research, for example, aggression, the desire and ability to escape from danger, and anxiety caused by environmental disturbances.
 
However, the artificial selection process also caused the mice to lose the very important trait of being able to survive in the wild. Besides these lost traits, the female lab mice developed the tendency to immediately mate with every male in their vicinity, including siblings and parents. That is, they lost the ability to selectivity choose a mate according to traits that “promise” the offspring better genes and a higher survival rate than those who share a common descent. At the same time, they evolved the willingness to take care of pups belonging to “strangers” (even if they are not themselves mothers). The strains of lab mice chosen to undergo further artificial selection are those who are not “fussy eaters,” grow faster and reach sexual maturity more quickly relative to wild mice. That is how we ended up with larger, less aggressive mice that reproduce at a younger age and are less particular when it comes to choosing a mate. In other words, these strains are quite different from wild mice with regard to structural, physiological and behavioral features.
Dr. Tali Kimchi
 
Dr. Tali Kimchi of the Weizmann Institute’s Neurobiology Department understood that these laboratory mouse strains are not suitable for answering some types of questions posed by her research, which focuses on the neural and genetic roots of social behavior, including reproduction and maternal instinct (for example, a mother’s aggression toward another’s offspring, and the role of odors – pheromones – in mate selection and caring for offspring). Therefore, Kimchi had to develop a unique mouse strain, restoring those properties removed from the laboratory mouse strains, while retaining the ability to employ genetic engineering tools to create mutant strains (a genetic change that disables the function of a particular gene).

To do this, Kimchi and her research group backcrossed strains of laboratory mutant mice that had a specific mutation in the gene responsible for detecting pheromone signals, with wild-derived (undomesticated) mice for ten generations. As a result, in these new backcrossed strains of mice, the scientists managed to reinstate traits typical of wild mice, which were lost through the domestication process and are absent in laboratory strains, including those pertaining to behavior, body structure, hormones, various biological processes and genetic functions. More specifically, they restored, among other things, the ability to react to and escape from danger, spontaneous anxiety-related jumping and freezing behavior, and aggressive attacks toward other females. Another important feature that was restored in the new breed of mice was maternal instinct: Naïve (not yet mated and maternal) backcrossed wild-derived female mice were less likely to nurture another’s pup they encountered. They were also aggressive toward those pups, as well as among themselves – just like wild mice.
 
The new mouse model created by Kimchi and her team has allowed them to explore, for the first time, the biological roots of aggressive behavior in females, both toward each other, and especially toward the pups of others. It also enabled them to locate a particular gene, which is responsible for the perception of pheromone signals, and to determine this to be the main cause for rejecting a stranger’s pup, as well as the aggressive behavior displayed toward them. A pup’s mother, it turns out, is the one and only, and stepmothers, naturally, are more aggressive toward others’ offspring. Their findings, published in the journal Nature Communications, provide the basis for developing additional mouse strains that will enable a better understanding of the neural and genetic basis of behavior relating to reproduction in females, and the differences between males and females.
 
Kimchi hopes that further research will lead, in the future, to a renewed understanding of the biological mechanisms underlying social and reproductive processes that have not been possible to explore in standard models of lab mice until now. It may also lead to a better understanding of the social component of neuropsychiatric diseases, which is manifested in different ways in men and women. Such knowledge will contribute to improving the development of drugs targeted to the different sexes, and in particular, will enable an analysis of the effect of certain drugs on women.
 
 
Dr. Tali Kimchi’s research is supported by the Nella and Leon Benoziyo Center for Neurological Diseases; the Murray H. & Meyer Grodetsky Center for Research of Higher Brain Functions; the Joan and Jonathan Birnbach Family Laboratory Fund; the Abisch Frenkel Foundation for the Promotion of Life Sciences; the Peter and Patricia Gruber Awards; Mike and Valeria Rosenbloom through the Mike Rosenbloom Foundation; the estate of Fannie Sherr; and the Irving B. Harris Fund for New Directions in Brain Research. Dr. Kimchi is the incumbent of the Jenna and Julia Birnbach Family Career Development Chair.
 
 
backcrossing wild-derived mice with lab mice infographic
 
 
backcrossing wild-derived mice with lab mice infographic
Life Sciences
English

Remembering in Time

English

Dr. Yaniv Ziv

If you try to recall the details of yesterday’s dinner, they are probably still vivid in your mind. But recalling the dinner you had a few days ago takes much more effort, even if you’d been dining in the same place and in the same company. What neural mechanisms make the newer memory clearer and the older ones vague and harder to retrieve? In more general terms, what happens to memories stored in the brain over time, sometimes over a lifetime? How are they affected by the passage of time, new experiences or disease?


These are the kinds of questions investigated by Dr. Yaniv Ziv, who recently joined the Weizmann Institute’s Neurobiology Department as a senior scientist. Ziv is focusing on the hippocampus, the brain structure that forms and stores the memories of events – episodic memory – as well as playing a central role in spatial orientation. This structure, located deep inside the brain under the cortex, has recently been the site of one of the most fascinating discoveries in modern neuroscience: Contrary to accepted dogma, new neurons are born in the adult human brain all the time. In fact, new neurons are estimated to be generated in the human hippocampus at the rate of about 700 a day. One of Ziv’s research goals is to clarify the role that these neurons play in the processing of memory.


To investigate memory over the long term, Ziv is taking advantage of optical imaging, an advanced technique that involves recording brain activity on video via a microscope.  During his postdoctoral research at Stanford University, he developed an optical imaging approach that has for the first time made it possible to accomplish a challenging task: monitoring the activity of large numbers of neurons deep within a living brain over a long period of time. The approach combines three novel technologies: a miniaturized fluorescence microscope that can be mounted like a helmet on the head of a freely-moving mouse; ultra-thin, rod-shaped implantable lenses that serve as micro-endoscopes for imaging deep-brain structures; and genetically engineered neurons that emit fluorescent light, whose varying intensity serves as an indicator of neuronal activity.
 

neurons

 

While at Stanford, Ziv used the system to perform a study in which he tracked the activity of thousands of so-called “place cells” in the hippocampus of mice over the course of several weeks as they explored a maze. As reported in Nature Neuroscience, the study produced a surprising finding: Even as the mice covered the same route in the maze day after day, the route was represented each time in their brain by a different subset of neurons – there was only about a 20 percent overlap among the subsets. This finding is consistent with the idea that events occurring in the same place at different times could be encoded differently in the memory. It would explain why we are able to distinguish between memories – for example, between the memory of the walk in the park we took yesterday from that of the same walk a day earlier.


In his new lab at Weizmann, Ziv applies his experimental system to continue examining long-term memory circuits in the hippocampus and study how these circuits are altered by experience and time. In one study, he is exploring how memories are clustered in time, which enables us, for example, to recall all of yesterday’s events as taking place during the same day. He also intends to look into the decline of memory that occurs in neurodegenerative diseases, particularly Alzheimer’s. A great deal has been learned in the past few decades about the genetic mutations and abnormal proteins involved in Alzheimer’s, but it is unknown how these defects affect the storage of information and memory by the brain. Ziv will address the connection between the molecular basis of neural degeneration and alterations in memory processing.


Shared interest


Dr. Yaniv Ziv and his wife Michal share a fascination with the brain: Yaniv seeks to decipher the neural code, Michal is a clinical psychologist. They met while conducting undergraduate studies in biology at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Yaniv, who earned his Ph.D. from the Weizmann Institute in 2007, under the guidance of Prof. Michal Schwartz, has joined the Weizmann faculty after conducting postdoctoral research at Stanford University for six years. He and his wife live on the Weizmann campus with their two daughters, aged seven and three.

 

Dr. Yaniv Ziv’s research is supported by the Irving I Moskowitz Foundation.
 

 


 

 
Dr. Yaniv Ziv
Life Sciences
English

Pages